鲍曼不动杆菌 DNA 损伤反应的抑制需要 DdrR 辅助 UmuDAb 二聚体与非典型 SOS 框的结合。

IF 2.7 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Bacteriology Pub Date : 2024-06-20 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1128/jb.00432-23
Belinda Candra, Deborah Cook, Janelle Hare
{"title":"鲍曼不动杆菌 DNA 损伤反应的抑制需要 DdrR 辅助 UmuDAb 二聚体与非典型 SOS 框的结合。","authors":"Belinda Candra, Deborah Cook, Janelle Hare","doi":"10.1128/jb.00432-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The DNA damage response of the multi-drug-resistant nosocomial pathogen <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> possesses multiple features that distinguish it from the commonly used LexA repression system. These include the absence of LexA in this genus, the evolution of a UmuD polymerase manager into the UmuDAb repressor of error-prone polymerases, the use of a corepressor unique to <i>Acinetobacter</i> (DdrR), and an unusually large UmuDAb binding site. We defined cis- and trans-acting factors required for UmuDAb DNA binding and gene repression, and tested whether DdrR directly enhances its DNA binding. We used DNA binding assays to characterize UmuDAb's binding to its proposed operator present upstream of the six co-repressed <i>umuDC</i> or <i>umuC</i> genes. UmuDAb bound tightly and cooperatively to this site with ~10-fold less affinity than LexA. DdrR enhanced the binding of both native and dimerization-deficient UmuDAb forms, but only in greater than equimolar ratios relative to UmuDAb. UmuDAb mutants unable to dimerize or effect gene repression showed impaired DNA binding, and a strain expressing the G124D dimerization mutant could not repress transcription of the UmuDAb-DdrR regulon. Competition electrophoretic mobility shift assays conducted with mutated operator probes showed that, unlike typical SOS boxes, the UmuDAb operator possessed a five-base pair central core whose sequence was more crucial for binding than the flanking palindrome. The presence of only one of the two flanking arms of the palindrome was necessary for UmuDAb binding. Overall, the data supported a model of an operator with two UmuDAb binding sites. The distinct characteristics of UmuDAb and its regulated promoters differ from the typical LexA repression model, demonstrating a novel method of repression.IMPORTANCE<i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> is a gram-negative bacterium responsible for hospital-acquired infections. Its unique DNA damage response can activate multiple error-prone polymerase genes, allowing it to gain mutations that can increase its virulence and antibiotic resistance. The emergence of infectious strains carrying multiple antibiotic resistance genes, including carbapenem resistance, lends urgency to discovering and developing ways to combat infections resistant to treatment with known antibiotics. Deciphering how the regulators UmuDAb and DdrR repress the error-prone polymerases could lead to developing complementary treatments to halt this mechanism of generating resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bacteriology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repression of <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> DNA damage response requires DdrR-assisted binding of UmuDAb dimers to atypical SOS box.\",\"authors\":\"Belinda Candra, Deborah Cook, Janelle Hare\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jb.00432-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The DNA damage response of the multi-drug-resistant nosocomial pathogen <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> possesses multiple features that distinguish it from the commonly used LexA repression system. These include the absence of LexA in this genus, the evolution of a UmuD polymerase manager into the UmuDAb repressor of error-prone polymerases, the use of a corepressor unique to <i>Acinetobacter</i> (DdrR), and an unusually large UmuDAb binding site. We defined cis- and trans-acting factors required for UmuDAb DNA binding and gene repression, and tested whether DdrR directly enhances its DNA binding. We used DNA binding assays to characterize UmuDAb's binding to its proposed operator present upstream of the six co-repressed <i>umuDC</i> or <i>umuC</i> genes. UmuDAb bound tightly and cooperatively to this site with ~10-fold less affinity than LexA. DdrR enhanced the binding of both native and dimerization-deficient UmuDAb forms, but only in greater than equimolar ratios relative to UmuDAb. UmuDAb mutants unable to dimerize or effect gene repression showed impaired DNA binding, and a strain expressing the G124D dimerization mutant could not repress transcription of the UmuDAb-DdrR regulon. Competition electrophoretic mobility shift assays conducted with mutated operator probes showed that, unlike typical SOS boxes, the UmuDAb operator possessed a five-base pair central core whose sequence was more crucial for binding than the flanking palindrome. The presence of only one of the two flanking arms of the palindrome was necessary for UmuDAb binding. Overall, the data supported a model of an operator with two UmuDAb binding sites. The distinct characteristics of UmuDAb and its regulated promoters differ from the typical LexA repression model, demonstrating a novel method of repression.IMPORTANCE<i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> is a gram-negative bacterium responsible for hospital-acquired infections. Its unique DNA damage response can activate multiple error-prone polymerase genes, allowing it to gain mutations that can increase its virulence and antibiotic resistance. The emergence of infectious strains carrying multiple antibiotic resistance genes, including carbapenem resistance, lends urgency to discovering and developing ways to combat infections resistant to treatment with known antibiotics. Deciphering how the regulators UmuDAb and DdrR repress the error-prone polymerases could lead to developing complementary treatments to halt this mechanism of generating resistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bacteriology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332147/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bacteriology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00432-23\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00432-23","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具有多种耐药性的医院病原体鲍曼不动杆菌的 DNA 损伤反应具有多种特征,有别于常用的 LexA 抑制系统。这些特征包括:该菌属中不存在 LexA、UmuD 聚合酶管理器进化为易出错聚合酶的 UmuDAb 抑制器、使用了鲍曼不动杆菌特有的核心抑制因子(DdrR)以及一个异常大的 UmuDAb 结合位点。我们定义了UmuDAb DNA结合和基因抑制所需的顺式和反式作用因子,并测试了DdrR是否能直接增强其DNA结合。我们使用DNA结合试验来鉴定UmuDAb与其存在于六个共同抑制的umuDC或umuC基因上游的拟议操作者的结合。UmuDAb与该位点紧密合作结合,其亲和力比LexA低约10倍。DdrR增强了原生和二聚化缺陷的UmuDAb形式的结合,但相对于UmuDAb而言,DdrR的结合比例高于等摩尔比例。不能二聚或产生基因抑制作用的UmuDAb突变体显示出DNA结合受损,表达G124D二聚突变体的菌株不能抑制UmuDAb-DdrR调控子的转录。用突变的操作子探针进行的竞争电泳迁移试验表明,与典型的SOS盒不同,UmuDAb操作子具有一个5碱基对的中心核心,其序列比侧翼的回文键对结合更为关键。在UmuDAb的结合过程中,只需存在两个侧翼回文臂中的一个。总之,这些数据支持一个具有两个 UmuDAb 结合位点的操作者模型。UmuDAb 及其调控启动子的独特特征不同于典型的 LexA 抑制模型,展示了一种新的抑制方法。重要意义鲍曼不动杆菌是一种革兰氏阴性细菌,是医院感染的罪魁祸首。其独特的 DNA 损伤反应可激活多个易出错的聚合酶基因,使其发生突变,从而增强毒性和抗生素耐药性。携带多种抗生素耐药性基因(包括碳青霉烯耐药性)的感染性菌株的出现,使得发现和开发抗击对已知抗生素治疗产生耐药性的感染的方法变得更加紧迫。破译调控因子UmuDAb和DdrR如何抑制易出错的聚合酶,有助于开发互补疗法,阻止这种产生抗药性的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repression of Acinetobacter baumannii DNA damage response requires DdrR-assisted binding of UmuDAb dimers to atypical SOS box.

The DNA damage response of the multi-drug-resistant nosocomial pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii possesses multiple features that distinguish it from the commonly used LexA repression system. These include the absence of LexA in this genus, the evolution of a UmuD polymerase manager into the UmuDAb repressor of error-prone polymerases, the use of a corepressor unique to Acinetobacter (DdrR), and an unusually large UmuDAb binding site. We defined cis- and trans-acting factors required for UmuDAb DNA binding and gene repression, and tested whether DdrR directly enhances its DNA binding. We used DNA binding assays to characterize UmuDAb's binding to its proposed operator present upstream of the six co-repressed umuDC or umuC genes. UmuDAb bound tightly and cooperatively to this site with ~10-fold less affinity than LexA. DdrR enhanced the binding of both native and dimerization-deficient UmuDAb forms, but only in greater than equimolar ratios relative to UmuDAb. UmuDAb mutants unable to dimerize or effect gene repression showed impaired DNA binding, and a strain expressing the G124D dimerization mutant could not repress transcription of the UmuDAb-DdrR regulon. Competition electrophoretic mobility shift assays conducted with mutated operator probes showed that, unlike typical SOS boxes, the UmuDAb operator possessed a five-base pair central core whose sequence was more crucial for binding than the flanking palindrome. The presence of only one of the two flanking arms of the palindrome was necessary for UmuDAb binding. Overall, the data supported a model of an operator with two UmuDAb binding sites. The distinct characteristics of UmuDAb and its regulated promoters differ from the typical LexA repression model, demonstrating a novel method of repression.IMPORTANCEAcinetobacter baumannii is a gram-negative bacterium responsible for hospital-acquired infections. Its unique DNA damage response can activate multiple error-prone polymerase genes, allowing it to gain mutations that can increase its virulence and antibiotic resistance. The emergence of infectious strains carrying multiple antibiotic resistance genes, including carbapenem resistance, lends urgency to discovering and developing ways to combat infections resistant to treatment with known antibiotics. Deciphering how the regulators UmuDAb and DdrR repress the error-prone polymerases could lead to developing complementary treatments to halt this mechanism of generating resistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bacteriology
Journal of Bacteriology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.40%
发文量
324
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bacteriology (JB) publishes research articles that probe fundamental processes in bacteria, archaea and their viruses, and the molecular mechanisms by which they interact with each other and with their hosts and their environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信