Dana Waltzman, Jill Daugherty, Alexis Peterson, Angela Lumba-Brown
{"title":"利用机器学习发现脑外伤患者表型:国家脑震荡监测系统试点。","authors":"Dana Waltzman, Jill Daugherty, Alexis Peterson, Angela Lumba-Brown","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2352524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective is to determine whether unsupervised machine learning identifies traumatic brain injury (TBI) phenotypes with unique clinical profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pilot self-reported survey data of over 10,000 adults were collected from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s National Concussion Surveillance System (NCSS). Respondents who self-reported a head injury in the past 12 months (<i>n</i> = 1,364) were retained and queried for injury, outcome, and clinical characteristics. An unsupervised machine learning algorithm, partitioning around medoids (PAM), that employed Gower's dissimilarity matrix, was used to conduct a cluster analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PAM grouped respondents into five TBI clusters (phenotypes A-E). Phenotype C represented more clinically severe TBIs with a higher prevalence of symptoms and association with worse outcomes. When compared to individuals in Phenotype A, a group with few TBI-related symptoms, individuals in Phenotype C were more likely to undergo medical evaluation (odds ratio [OR] = 9.8, 95% confidence interval[CI] = 5.8-16.6), have symptoms that were not currently resolved or resolved in 8+ days (OR = 10.6, 95%CI = 6.2-18.1), and more likely to report at least moderate impact on social (OR = 54.7, 95%CI = 22.4-133.4) and work (OR = 25.4, 95%CI = 11.2-57.2) functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning can be used to classify patients into unique TBI phenotypes. Further research might examine the utility of such classifications in supporting clinical diagnosis and patient recovery for this complex health condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"880-888"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using machine learning to discover traumatic brain injury patient phenotypes: national concussion surveillance system Pilot.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Waltzman, Jill Daugherty, Alexis Peterson, Angela Lumba-Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699052.2024.2352524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective is to determine whether unsupervised machine learning identifies traumatic brain injury (TBI) phenotypes with unique clinical profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pilot self-reported survey data of over 10,000 adults were collected from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s National Concussion Surveillance System (NCSS). Respondents who self-reported a head injury in the past 12 months (<i>n</i> = 1,364) were retained and queried for injury, outcome, and clinical characteristics. An unsupervised machine learning algorithm, partitioning around medoids (PAM), that employed Gower's dissimilarity matrix, was used to conduct a cluster analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PAM grouped respondents into five TBI clusters (phenotypes A-E). Phenotype C represented more clinically severe TBIs with a higher prevalence of symptoms and association with worse outcomes. When compared to individuals in Phenotype A, a group with few TBI-related symptoms, individuals in Phenotype C were more likely to undergo medical evaluation (odds ratio [OR] = 9.8, 95% confidence interval[CI] = 5.8-16.6), have symptoms that were not currently resolved or resolved in 8+ days (OR = 10.6, 95%CI = 6.2-18.1), and more likely to report at least moderate impact on social (OR = 54.7, 95%CI = 22.4-133.4) and work (OR = 25.4, 95%CI = 11.2-57.2) functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning can be used to classify patients into unique TBI phenotypes. Further research might examine the utility of such classifications in supporting clinical diagnosis and patient recovery for this complex health condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain injury\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"880-888\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323138/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain injury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2352524\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2352524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的目的是确定无监督机器学习是否能识别具有独特临床特征的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)表型:从美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的国家脑震荡监测系统(NCSS)中收集了超过 10,000 名成年人的试点自我报告调查数据。保留了自我报告在过去 12 个月中头部受伤的受访者(n = 1,364),并对其受伤情况、结果和临床特征进行了查询。采用无监督机器学习算法--围绕中间值分区(PAM),利用高尔异质性矩阵进行聚类分析:结果:PAM 将受访者分为五个创伤性脑损伤群组(表型 A-E)。表型 C 代表临床上更严重的创伤性脑损伤,其症状发生率更高,与更差的预后相关。与表型 A(几乎没有创伤性脑损伤相关症状)中的人相比,表型 C 中的人更有可能接受医疗评估(几率比[OR] = 9.8,95% 置信区间[CI] = 5.8-16.结论:机器学习可以对创伤相关症状进行分类:结论:机器学习可用于将患者划分为独特的创伤性脑损伤表型。结论:机器学习可用于将患者划分为独特的创伤性脑损伤表型,进一步的研究可能会检验这种分类在支持临床诊断和患者康复方面的实用性。
Using machine learning to discover traumatic brain injury patient phenotypes: national concussion surveillance system Pilot.
Objective: The objective is to determine whether unsupervised machine learning identifies traumatic brain injury (TBI) phenotypes with unique clinical profiles.
Methods: Pilot self-reported survey data of over 10,000 adults were collected from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s National Concussion Surveillance System (NCSS). Respondents who self-reported a head injury in the past 12 months (n = 1,364) were retained and queried for injury, outcome, and clinical characteristics. An unsupervised machine learning algorithm, partitioning around medoids (PAM), that employed Gower's dissimilarity matrix, was used to conduct a cluster analysis.
Results: PAM grouped respondents into five TBI clusters (phenotypes A-E). Phenotype C represented more clinically severe TBIs with a higher prevalence of symptoms and association with worse outcomes. When compared to individuals in Phenotype A, a group with few TBI-related symptoms, individuals in Phenotype C were more likely to undergo medical evaluation (odds ratio [OR] = 9.8, 95% confidence interval[CI] = 5.8-16.6), have symptoms that were not currently resolved or resolved in 8+ days (OR = 10.6, 95%CI = 6.2-18.1), and more likely to report at least moderate impact on social (OR = 54.7, 95%CI = 22.4-133.4) and work (OR = 25.4, 95%CI = 11.2-57.2) functioning.
Conclusion: Machine learning can be used to classify patients into unique TBI phenotypes. Further research might examine the utility of such classifications in supporting clinical diagnosis and patient recovery for this complex health condition.
期刊介绍:
Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.