Jie Li, Shan Lyu, Jian Luo, Ping Liu, Fai A Albuainain, Omar A Alamoudi, Violaine Rochette, Stephan Ehrmann
{"title":"通过呼吸道输送预防性抗生素以减少呼吸机相关肺炎:系统综述、网络 Meta 分析和随机对照试验的序列分析》。","authors":"Jie Li, Shan Lyu, Jian Luo, Ping Liu, Fai A Albuainain, Omar A Alamoudi, Violaine Rochette, Stephan Ehrmann","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of antibiotics delivered via the respiratory tract in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published in English up to October 25, 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Adult patients with mechanical ventilation of over 48 h and receiving inhaled or instilled antibiotics (with control group) to prevent VAP were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two independent groups screened studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty/quality of the evidence. Results of a random-effects model were reported for overall and predefined subgroup meta-analyses. The analysis was primarily conducted on randomized controlled trials, and observational studies were used for sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Seven RCTs with 1445 patients were included, of which six involving 1283 patients used nebulizers to deliver antibiotics. No obvious risk of bias was found among the included RCTs for the primary outcome. Compared with control group, prophylactic antibiotics delivery via the respiratory tract significantly reduced the risk of VAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53-0.89]), particularly in subgroups where aminoglycosides (RR, 0.67 [0.47-0.97]) or nebulization (RR, 0.64 [0.49-0.83]) were used as opposed to other antibiotics (ceftazidime and colistin) or intratracheal instillation. No significant differences were observed in mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of systemic antibiotics, need for tracheostomy, and adverse events between the two groups. Results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adult patients with mechanical ventilation for over 48 h, prophylactic antibiotics delivered via the respiratory tract reduced the risk of VAP, particularly for those treated with nebulized aminoglycosides.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1612-1623"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic Antibiotics Delivered Via the Respiratory Tract to Reduce Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Jie Li, Shan Lyu, Jian Luo, Ping Liu, Fai A Albuainain, Omar A Alamoudi, Violaine Rochette, Stephan Ehrmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of antibiotics delivered via the respiratory tract in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published in English up to October 25, 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Adult patients with mechanical ventilation of over 48 h and receiving inhaled or instilled antibiotics (with control group) to prevent VAP were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two independent groups screened studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty/quality of the evidence. Results of a random-effects model were reported for overall and predefined subgroup meta-analyses. The analysis was primarily conducted on randomized controlled trials, and observational studies were used for sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Seven RCTs with 1445 patients were included, of which six involving 1283 patients used nebulizers to deliver antibiotics. No obvious risk of bias was found among the included RCTs for the primary outcome. Compared with control group, prophylactic antibiotics delivery via the respiratory tract significantly reduced the risk of VAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53-0.89]), particularly in subgroups where aminoglycosides (RR, 0.67 [0.47-0.97]) or nebulization (RR, 0.64 [0.49-0.83]) were used as opposed to other antibiotics (ceftazidime and colistin) or intratracheal instillation. No significant differences were observed in mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of systemic antibiotics, need for tracheostomy, and adverse events between the two groups. Results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adult patients with mechanical ventilation for over 48 h, prophylactic antibiotics delivered via the respiratory tract reduced the risk of VAP, particularly for those treated with nebulized aminoglycosides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1612-1623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006323\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006323","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prophylactic Antibiotics Delivered Via the Respiratory Tract to Reduce Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Objectives: To assess the effects of antibiotics delivered via the respiratory tract in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
Data sources: We searched PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published in English up to October 25, 2023.
Study selection: Adult patients with mechanical ventilation of over 48 h and receiving inhaled or instilled antibiotics (with control group) to prevent VAP were included.
Data extraction: Two independent groups screened studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty/quality of the evidence. Results of a random-effects model were reported for overall and predefined subgroup meta-analyses. The analysis was primarily conducted on randomized controlled trials, and observational studies were used for sensitivity analyses.
Data synthesis: Seven RCTs with 1445 patients were included, of which six involving 1283 patients used nebulizers to deliver antibiotics. No obvious risk of bias was found among the included RCTs for the primary outcome. Compared with control group, prophylactic antibiotics delivery via the respiratory tract significantly reduced the risk of VAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53-0.89]), particularly in subgroups where aminoglycosides (RR, 0.67 [0.47-0.97]) or nebulization (RR, 0.64 [0.49-0.83]) were used as opposed to other antibiotics (ceftazidime and colistin) or intratracheal instillation. No significant differences were observed in mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of systemic antibiotics, need for tracheostomy, and adverse events between the two groups. Results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: In adult patients with mechanical ventilation for over 48 h, prophylactic antibiotics delivered via the respiratory tract reduced the risk of VAP, particularly for those treated with nebulized aminoglycosides.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.