从英国生物库中的自动心血管磁共振短轴和长轴分析中评估深度学习对整个心脏解剖的估计。

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Marica Muffoletto, Hao Xu, Richard Burns, Avan Suinesiaputra, Anastasia Nasopoulou, Karl P Kunze, Radhouene Neji, Steffen E Petersen, Steven A Niederer, Daniel Rueckert, Alistair A Young
{"title":"从英国生物库中的自动心血管磁共振短轴和长轴分析中评估深度学习对整个心脏解剖的估计。","authors":"Marica Muffoletto, Hao Xu, Richard Burns, Avan Suinesiaputra, Anastasia Nasopoulou, Karl P Kunze, Radhouene Neji, Steffen E Petersen, Steven A Niederer, Daniel Rueckert, Alistair A Young","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeae123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Standard methods of heart chamber volume estimation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) typically utilize simple geometric formulae based on a limited number of slices. We aimed to evaluate whether an automated deep learning neural network prediction of 3D anatomy of all four chambers would show stronger associations with cardiovascular risk factors and disease than standard volume estimation methods in the UK Biobank.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A deep learning network was adapted to predict 3D segmentations of left and right ventricles (LV, RV) and atria (LA, RA) at ∼1 mm isotropic resolution from CMR short- and long-axis 2D segmentations obtained from a fully automated machine learning pipeline in 4723 individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 5733 without in the UK Biobank. Relationships between volumes at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) and risk/disease factors were quantified using univariate, multivariate, and logistic regression analyses. Strength of association between deep learning volumes and standard volumes was compared using the area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUC). Univariate and multivariate associations between deep learning volumes and most risk and disease factors were stronger than for standard volumes (higher R2 and more significant P-values), particularly for sex, age, and body mass index. AUCs for all logistic regressions were higher for deep learning volumes than standard volumes (P < 0.001 for all four chambers at ED and ES).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neural network reconstructions of whole heart volumes had significantly stronger associations with CVD and risk factors than standard volume estimation methods in an automatic processing pipeline.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"1374-1383"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of deep learning estimation of whole heart anatomy from automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance short- and long-axis analyses in UK Biobank.\",\"authors\":\"Marica Muffoletto, Hao Xu, Richard Burns, Avan Suinesiaputra, Anastasia Nasopoulou, Karl P Kunze, Radhouene Neji, Steffen E Petersen, Steven A Niederer, Daniel Rueckert, Alistair A Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjci/jeae123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Standard methods of heart chamber volume estimation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) typically utilize simple geometric formulae based on a limited number of slices. We aimed to evaluate whether an automated deep learning neural network prediction of 3D anatomy of all four chambers would show stronger associations with cardiovascular risk factors and disease than standard volume estimation methods in the UK Biobank.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A deep learning network was adapted to predict 3D segmentations of left and right ventricles (LV, RV) and atria (LA, RA) at ∼1 mm isotropic resolution from CMR short- and long-axis 2D segmentations obtained from a fully automated machine learning pipeline in 4723 individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 5733 without in the UK Biobank. Relationships between volumes at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) and risk/disease factors were quantified using univariate, multivariate, and logistic regression analyses. Strength of association between deep learning volumes and standard volumes was compared using the area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUC). Univariate and multivariate associations between deep learning volumes and most risk and disease factors were stronger than for standard volumes (higher R2 and more significant P-values), particularly for sex, age, and body mass index. AUCs for all logistic regressions were higher for deep learning volumes than standard volumes (P < 0.001 for all four chambers at ED and ES).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neural network reconstructions of whole heart volumes had significantly stronger associations with CVD and risk factors than standard volume estimation methods in an automatic processing pipeline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1374-1383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae123\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心血管磁共振(CMR)中估算心腔容积的标准方法通常使用基于有限切片数量的简单几何公式。我们的目的是评估在英国生物库中,对所有四个心腔的三维解剖进行自动深度学习神经网络预测是否会比标准容积估算方法显示出与心血管风险因素和疾病更强的关联性:方法:在英国生物样本库中,对4723名心血管疾病(CVD)患者和5733名非心血管疾病患者采用全自动机器学习管道获得的CMR短轴和长轴二维切片,调整深度学习网络,以1毫米的各向同性分辨率预测左、右心室(LV、RV)和心房(LA、RA)的三维切片。使用单变量、多变量和逻辑回归分析量化了舒张末期(ED)和收缩末期(ES)容积与风险/疾病因素之间的关系。使用接受操作者特征曲线下面积(AUC)比较了深度学习容量与标准容量之间的关联强度:结果:深度学习容量与大多数风险和疾病因素之间的单变量和多变量关联性比标准容量更强(R2更高,P值更显著),尤其是性别、年龄和体重指数。深度学习容积的所有逻辑回归AUC均高于标准容积(P结论:在自动处理管道中,全心容积的神经网络重构与心血管疾病和风险因素的关联明显强于标准容积估算方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of deep learning estimation of whole heart anatomy from automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance short- and long-axis analyses in UK Biobank.

Aims: Standard methods of heart chamber volume estimation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) typically utilize simple geometric formulae based on a limited number of slices. We aimed to evaluate whether an automated deep learning neural network prediction of 3D anatomy of all four chambers would show stronger associations with cardiovascular risk factors and disease than standard volume estimation methods in the UK Biobank.

Methods and results: A deep learning network was adapted to predict 3D segmentations of left and right ventricles (LV, RV) and atria (LA, RA) at ∼1 mm isotropic resolution from CMR short- and long-axis 2D segmentations obtained from a fully automated machine learning pipeline in 4723 individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 5733 without in the UK Biobank. Relationships between volumes at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) and risk/disease factors were quantified using univariate, multivariate, and logistic regression analyses. Strength of association between deep learning volumes and standard volumes was compared using the area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUC). Univariate and multivariate associations between deep learning volumes and most risk and disease factors were stronger than for standard volumes (higher R2 and more significant P-values), particularly for sex, age, and body mass index. AUCs for all logistic regressions were higher for deep learning volumes than standard volumes (P < 0.001 for all four chambers at ED and ES).

Conclusion: Neural network reconstructions of whole heart volumes had significantly stronger associations with CVD and risk factors than standard volume estimation methods in an automatic processing pipeline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
708
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信