CYP2C19多态性与冠状动脉支架内再狭窄:系统回顾和荟萃分析

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.109321.2
Yusra Pintaningrum, Vitriyaturrida, Ivana Purnama Dewi, Hendy Bhaskara Perdana Putra, Idar Mappangara, Muzakkir Amir, Irawan Yusuf, Agussalim Bukhari
{"title":"CYP2C19多态性与冠状动脉支架内再狭窄:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Yusra Pintaningrum, Vitriyaturrida, Ivana Purnama Dewi, Hendy Bhaskara Perdana Putra, Idar Mappangara, Muzakkir Amir, Irawan Yusuf, Agussalim Bukhari","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.109321.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major drawback in coronary stenting. The association between the CYP2C19 loss of function (LOF) gene and the prevalence of ISR after coronary stenting remains controversial. Previous studies have produced conflicting results and have been limited by their small population sizes. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between the presence of the CYP2C19 LOF gene and the prevalence of ISR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic online database search was performed until April 2021. The primary outcome was ISR and assessed using OR with 95% CI. Quality of the study was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. <i>I <sup>2</sup></i> was applied to examine heterogeneities among the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 284 patients (four non-randomized controlled trial studies) were included in this study. Two hundred and six patients had wild-type genotypes, while 78 patients had the LOF genotype. Among the 78 patients with the LOF gene, 38 patients had an ISR. Meanwhile, of the 206 patients with a wild-type gene, 69 patients had an ISR. LOF gene was associated with a higher risk of ISR (OR 95% CI = 2.71 [1.42-5.16], P = 0.003). However, study-specific variability should be considered when applying these findings clinically.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with LOF genes, regardless of the allele variation, treated with clopidogrel, had a higher likelihood of ISR after coronary stenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"11 ","pages":"346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CYP2C19 polymorphism and coronary in-stent restenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yusra Pintaningrum, Vitriyaturrida, Ivana Purnama Dewi, Hendy Bhaskara Perdana Putra, Idar Mappangara, Muzakkir Amir, Irawan Yusuf, Agussalim Bukhari\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/f1000research.109321.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major drawback in coronary stenting. The association between the CYP2C19 loss of function (LOF) gene and the prevalence of ISR after coronary stenting remains controversial. Previous studies have produced conflicting results and have been limited by their small population sizes. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between the presence of the CYP2C19 LOF gene and the prevalence of ISR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic online database search was performed until April 2021. The primary outcome was ISR and assessed using OR with 95% CI. Quality of the study was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. <i>I <sup>2</sup></i> was applied to examine heterogeneities among the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 284 patients (four non-randomized controlled trial studies) were included in this study. Two hundred and six patients had wild-type genotypes, while 78 patients had the LOF genotype. Among the 78 patients with the LOF gene, 38 patients had an ISR. Meanwhile, of the 206 patients with a wild-type gene, 69 patients had an ISR. LOF gene was associated with a higher risk of ISR (OR 95% CI = 2.71 [1.42-5.16], P = 0.003). However, study-specific variability should be considered when applying these findings clinically.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with LOF genes, regardless of the allele variation, treated with clopidogrel, had a higher likelihood of ISR after coronary stenting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F1000Research\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078198/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F1000Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109321.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109321.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:支架内再狭窄(ISR)仍是冠状动脉支架置入术的一大缺陷。CYP2C19功能缺失(LOF)基因与冠状动脉支架置入术后ISR发生率之间的关系仍存在争议。以往的研究结果相互矛盾,且受限于较小的人群规模。我们进行了这项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定 CYP2C19 LOF 基因的存在与 ISR 发生率之间的关系。研究方法在 2021 年 4 月之前进行了一次系统的在线数据库检索。主要结果为ISR,使用OR和95% CI进行评估。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估发表偏倚。采用 I 2 检验研究之间的异质性。研究结果本研究共纳入 284 名患者(4 项非随机对照试验研究)。其中 26 名患者的基因型为野生型,78 名患者的基因型为 LOF 型。在 78 名 LOF 基因患者中,有 40 名患者出现了 ISR。与此同时,在 206 名野生型基因患者中,有 69 名患者出现了 ISR。LOF 基因与较高的 ISR 风险相关(OR 95% CI = 2.84 [1.54-5.24], p = 0.0008)。我们研究的一个主要局限是以往研究数量少,样本量小。结论无论等位基因如何变异,带有 LOF 基因的患者在接受氯吡格雷治疗后,冠状动脉支架置入术后发生 ISR 的风险较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CYP2C19 polymorphism and coronary in-stent restenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major drawback in coronary stenting. The association between the CYP2C19 loss of function (LOF) gene and the prevalence of ISR after coronary stenting remains controversial. Previous studies have produced conflicting results and have been limited by their small population sizes. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between the presence of the CYP2C19 LOF gene and the prevalence of ISR.

Methods: A systematic online database search was performed until April 2021. The primary outcome was ISR and assessed using OR with 95% CI. Quality of the study was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. I 2 was applied to examine heterogeneities among the studies.

Results: A total of 284 patients (four non-randomized controlled trial studies) were included in this study. Two hundred and six patients had wild-type genotypes, while 78 patients had the LOF genotype. Among the 78 patients with the LOF gene, 38 patients had an ISR. Meanwhile, of the 206 patients with a wild-type gene, 69 patients had an ISR. LOF gene was associated with a higher risk of ISR (OR 95% CI = 2.71 [1.42-5.16], P = 0.003). However, study-specific variability should be considered when applying these findings clinically.

Conclusions: Patients with LOF genes, regardless of the allele variation, treated with clopidogrel, had a higher likelihood of ISR after coronary stenting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信