[卫生领域的人力资源管理。协商一致的前进道路。SESPAS 报告 2024]。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Miguel Angel Negrín , Vicente Ortún
{"title":"[卫生领域的人力资源管理。协商一致的前进道路。SESPAS 报告 2024]。","authors":"Miguel Angel Negrín ,&nbsp;Vicente Ortún","doi":"10.1016/j.gaceta.2024.102394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Healthcare professionals deserve good management, and Spain, stagnant in its productivity, needs it. Good management is possible, as evidenced during the states of alarm in 2020. None of the lessons learned have been consolidated. Dismissing the term “public management” as an oxymoron is extreme, as there has never been a greater need for a well-functioning state, along with a better market, for reasons beyond the consolidation of the welfare state. The opposite extreme of thinking that salvation lies only within the civil service is also unhelpful. Bureaucratic sclerosis, a sign of deterioration, focused on legality or its appearance, cannot continue to ignore the need for effectiveness. The quality of management, both in general and in the healthcare sector, can be measured, and there is knowledge on how to improve it. More flexible models of labor relations —for selection, recruitment, and retention based on improved criteria of “equality, merit, and capability”— require modifications in institutional architecture, as proposed in this article: competitor benchmarking among autonomous centers and responsible entities that share standardized rules. The healthcare system, the jewel of the country, thanks in large part to the quality of its human resources, not only deserves to have its potential unleashed but can also lead the necessary increase in its resolution capacity, ensuring its impact on social well-being. It can also document its research and innovative capabilities in intellectual property, thereby contributing to the gross domestic product.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12494,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Sanitaria","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 102394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911124000414/pdfft?md5=7abd87a1cf775db7e0bc687c3e2f68ab&pid=1-s2.0-S0213911124000414-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gestión de recursos humanos en sanidad. Vías de avance consensuables. Informe SESPAS 2024\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Angel Negrín ,&nbsp;Vicente Ortún\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaceta.2024.102394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Healthcare professionals deserve good management, and Spain, stagnant in its productivity, needs it. Good management is possible, as evidenced during the states of alarm in 2020. None of the lessons learned have been consolidated. Dismissing the term “public management” as an oxymoron is extreme, as there has never been a greater need for a well-functioning state, along with a better market, for reasons beyond the consolidation of the welfare state. The opposite extreme of thinking that salvation lies only within the civil service is also unhelpful. Bureaucratic sclerosis, a sign of deterioration, focused on legality or its appearance, cannot continue to ignore the need for effectiveness. The quality of management, both in general and in the healthcare sector, can be measured, and there is knowledge on how to improve it. More flexible models of labor relations —for selection, recruitment, and retention based on improved criteria of “equality, merit, and capability”— require modifications in institutional architecture, as proposed in this article: competitor benchmarking among autonomous centers and responsible entities that share standardized rules. The healthcare system, the jewel of the country, thanks in large part to the quality of its human resources, not only deserves to have its potential unleashed but can also lead the necessary increase in its resolution capacity, ensuring its impact on social well-being. It can also document its research and innovative capabilities in intellectual property, thereby contributing to the gross domestic product.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911124000414/pdfft?md5=7abd87a1cf775db7e0bc687c3e2f68ab&pid=1-s2.0-S0213911124000414-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911124000414\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Sanitaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911124000414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健专业人员应该得到良好的管理,而生产力停滞不前的西班牙也需要这种管理。良好的管理是可能的,2020 年的警报状态就是证明。但所有的经验教训都没有得到巩固。将 "公共管理 "一词视为矛盾的说法是极端的,因为除了巩固福利国家之外,从未像现在这样需要一个运作良好的国家和一个更好的市场。相反,认为救赎只在于公务员制度的极端想法也是无益的。官僚主义的僵化是每况愈下的一种表现,它只注重合法性或表面现象,不能继续忽视有效性的需要。管理的质量,无论是在一般情况下还是在医疗保健部门,都是可以衡量的,也有如何改进的知识。更灵活的劳资关系模式--根据 "平等、择优和能力 "的改进标准进行选拔、招聘和留用--需要对体制结构进行调整,正如本文所建议的那样:在共享标准化规则的自治中心和责任实体之间建立竞争对手基准。医疗保健系统是国家的瑰宝,在很大程度上得益于其人力资源的质量,它不仅应该释放其潜能,而且还可以领导其解决能力的必要增长,确保其对社会福祉的影响。它还可以记录其在知识产权方面的研究和创新能力,从而为国内生产总值做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gestión de recursos humanos en sanidad. Vías de avance consensuables. Informe SESPAS 2024

Healthcare professionals deserve good management, and Spain, stagnant in its productivity, needs it. Good management is possible, as evidenced during the states of alarm in 2020. None of the lessons learned have been consolidated. Dismissing the term “public management” as an oxymoron is extreme, as there has never been a greater need for a well-functioning state, along with a better market, for reasons beyond the consolidation of the welfare state. The opposite extreme of thinking that salvation lies only within the civil service is also unhelpful. Bureaucratic sclerosis, a sign of deterioration, focused on legality or its appearance, cannot continue to ignore the need for effectiveness. The quality of management, both in general and in the healthcare sector, can be measured, and there is knowledge on how to improve it. More flexible models of labor relations —for selection, recruitment, and retention based on improved criteria of “equality, merit, and capability”— require modifications in institutional architecture, as proposed in this article: competitor benchmarking among autonomous centers and responsible entities that share standardized rules. The healthcare system, the jewel of the country, thanks in large part to the quality of its human resources, not only deserves to have its potential unleashed but can also lead the necessary increase in its resolution capacity, ensuring its impact on social well-being. It can also document its research and innovative capabilities in intellectual property, thereby contributing to the gross domestic product.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gaceta Sanitaria
Gaceta Sanitaria 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
80
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Gaceta Sanitaria (Health Gazette) is an international journal that accepts articles in Spanish and in English. It is the official scientific journal of the Sociedad Española de Salud Publica y Administración Sanitaria (Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration) (SESPAS). The Journal publishes 6 issues per year on different areas of Public Health and Health Administration, including: -Applied epidemiology- Health prevention and promotion- Environmental health- International health- Management and assessment of policies and services- Health technology assessments- Health economics. The editorial process is regulated by a peer review system. It publishes original works, reviews, opinion articles, field and methodology notes, protocols, letters to the editor, editorials, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信