医学教育中论文式问题的复兴:利用人工智能和机器学习。

Muhammad Shahid Shamim, Syed Jaffar Abbas Zaidi, Abdur Rehman
{"title":"医学教育中论文式问题的复兴:利用人工智能和机器学习。","authors":"Muhammad Shahid Shamim, Syed Jaffar Abbas Zaidi, Abdur Rehman","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.05.595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse and compare the assessment and grading of human-written and machine-written formative essays.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Quasi-experimental, qualitative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Science of Dental Materials, Hamdard College of Medicine & Dentistry, Hamdard University, Karachi, from February to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Ten short formative essays of final-year dental students were manually assessed and graded. These essays were then graded using ChatGPT version 3.5. The chatbot responses and prompts were recorded and matched with manually graded essays. Qualitative analysis of the chatbot responses was then performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four different prompts were given to the artificial intelligence (AI) driven platform of ChatGPT to grade the summative essays. These were the chatbot's initial responses without grading, the chatbot's response to grading against criteria, the chatbot's response to criteria-wise grading, and the chatbot's response to questions for the difference in grading. Based on the results, four innovative ways of using AI and machine learning (ML) have been proposed for medical educators: Automated grading, content analysis, plagiarism detection, and formative assessment. ChatGPT provided a comprehensive report with feedback on writing skills, as opposed to manual grading of essays.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The chatbot's responses were fascinating and thought-provoking. AI and ML technologies can potentially supplement human grading in the assessment of essays. Medical educators need to embrace AI and ML technology to enhance the standards and quality of medical education, particularly when assessing long and short essay-type questions. Further empirical research and evaluation are needed to confirm their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Machine learning, Artificial intelligence, Essays, ChatGPT, Formative assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Revival of Essay-Type Questions in Medical Education: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Shahid Shamim, Syed Jaffar Abbas Zaidi, Abdur Rehman\",\"doi\":\"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.05.595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse and compare the assessment and grading of human-written and machine-written formative essays.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Quasi-experimental, qualitative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Science of Dental Materials, Hamdard College of Medicine & Dentistry, Hamdard University, Karachi, from February to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Ten short formative essays of final-year dental students were manually assessed and graded. These essays were then graded using ChatGPT version 3.5. The chatbot responses and prompts were recorded and matched with manually graded essays. Qualitative analysis of the chatbot responses was then performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four different prompts were given to the artificial intelligence (AI) driven platform of ChatGPT to grade the summative essays. These were the chatbot's initial responses without grading, the chatbot's response to grading against criteria, the chatbot's response to criteria-wise grading, and the chatbot's response to questions for the difference in grading. Based on the results, four innovative ways of using AI and machine learning (ML) have been proposed for medical educators: Automated grading, content analysis, plagiarism detection, and formative assessment. ChatGPT provided a comprehensive report with feedback on writing skills, as opposed to manual grading of essays.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The chatbot's responses were fascinating and thought-provoking. AI and ML technologies can potentially supplement human grading in the assessment of essays. Medical educators need to embrace AI and ML technology to enhance the standards and quality of medical education, particularly when assessing long and short essay-type questions. Further empirical research and evaluation are needed to confirm their effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Machine learning, Artificial intelligence, Essays, ChatGPT, Formative assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.05.595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.05.595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的研究设计:准实验、定性横断面研究。研究地点和时间:研究地点和时间:卡拉奇哈姆达德大学哈姆达德医学与牙科学院牙科材料科学系,2023 年 2 月至 4 月:对口腔医学专业毕业班学生的 10 篇形成性短文进行人工评估和评分。然后使用 ChatGPT 3.5 版本对这些论文进行评分。记录聊天机器人的回复和提示,并与人工评分的论文进行比对。然后对聊天机器人的回复进行了定性分析:人工智能(AI)驱动的 ChatGPT 平台为终结性论文评分时给出了四种不同的提示。这四种不同的提示分别是:聊天机器人在没有评分的情况下的初始回复、聊天机器人根据标准评分的回复、聊天机器人根据标准评分的回复以及聊天机器人对评分差异问题的回复。根据研究结果,为医学教育工作者提出了四种使用人工智能和机器学习(ML)的创新方法:自动评分、内容分析、抄袭检测和形成性评估。ChatGPT 提供了一份全面的报告,对写作技巧进行了反馈,而不是对论文进行人工评分:聊天机器人的回答引人入胜,发人深省。人工智能和 ML 技术有可能在论文评估中补充人工评分。医学教育工作者需要采用人工智能和 ML 技术来提高医学教育的标准和质量,尤其是在评估长篇和短篇论文类型的问题时。需要进一步的实证研究和评估来确认其有效性:机器学习 人工智能 论文 ChatGPT 形成性评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Revival of Essay-Type Questions in Medical Education: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.

Objective: To analyse and compare the assessment and grading of human-written and machine-written formative essays.

Study design: Quasi-experimental, qualitative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Science of Dental Materials, Hamdard College of Medicine & Dentistry, Hamdard University, Karachi, from February to April 2023.

Methodology: Ten short formative essays of final-year dental students were manually assessed and graded. These essays were then graded using ChatGPT version 3.5. The chatbot responses and prompts were recorded and matched with manually graded essays. Qualitative analysis of the chatbot responses was then performed.

Results: Four different prompts were given to the artificial intelligence (AI) driven platform of ChatGPT to grade the summative essays. These were the chatbot's initial responses without grading, the chatbot's response to grading against criteria, the chatbot's response to criteria-wise grading, and the chatbot's response to questions for the difference in grading. Based on the results, four innovative ways of using AI and machine learning (ML) have been proposed for medical educators: Automated grading, content analysis, plagiarism detection, and formative assessment. ChatGPT provided a comprehensive report with feedback on writing skills, as opposed to manual grading of essays.

Conclusion: The chatbot's responses were fascinating and thought-provoking. AI and ML technologies can potentially supplement human grading in the assessment of essays. Medical educators need to embrace AI and ML technology to enhance the standards and quality of medical education, particularly when assessing long and short essay-type questions. Further empirical research and evaluation are needed to confirm their effectiveness.

Key words: Machine learning, Artificial intelligence, Essays, ChatGPT, Formative assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信