英格兰 2023 年秋季 COVID-19 疫苗接种的效果以及之前接种的疫苗对住院治疗的剩余保护作用,使用测试阴性病例对照研究进行估算。

IF 14.3 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Freja C.M. Kirsebom , Julia Stowe , Jamie Lopez Bernal , Alex Allen , Nick Andrews
{"title":"英格兰 2023 年秋季 COVID-19 疫苗接种的效果以及之前接种的疫苗对住院治疗的剩余保护作用,使用测试阴性病例对照研究进行估算。","authors":"Freja C.M. Kirsebom ,&nbsp;Julia Stowe ,&nbsp;Jamie Lopez Bernal ,&nbsp;Alex Allen ,&nbsp;Nick Andrews","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The last COVID-19 vaccine offered to all adults in England became available from November 2021. The most recent booster programme commenced in September 2023. Bivalent BA.4–5 or monovalent XBB.1.5 boosters were given. During the study period, the JN.1 variant became dominant in England.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation was estimated throughout using the test-negative case-control study design where positive PCR tests from hospitalised individuals are cases and comparable negative PCR tests are controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation with the test result as the outcome, vaccination status as the primary exposure variable of interest and confounder adjustment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no evidence of residual protection for boosters given as part of previous campaigns. There were 28,916 eligible tests included to estimate the effectiveness of the autumn 2023 boosters in those aged 65 years and older. VE peaked at 50.6% (95% CI: 44.2–56.3%) after 2–4 weeks, followed by waning to 13.6% (95% CI: −11.7 to 33.2%). Estimates were generally higher for the XBB.1.5 booster than the BA.4–5 booster, but this difference was not statistically significant. Point estimates were highest against XBB sub-lineages. Effectiveness was lower against both JN.1 and EG.5.1 variants with confidence intervals non-overlapping with the effectiveness of the XBB sub-lineages at 2–4 weeks for EG.5.1 where VE was 44.5% (95% CI: 20.2–61.4%) and at 5–9 weeks for JN.1 where VE was 26.4% (95%CI: −3.4 to 47.6%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The recent monovalent XBB.1.5 and bivalent BA.4–5 boosters provided comparable and good protection against hospitalisation, however there was evidence of lower VE against hospitalisation of these boosters against JN.1.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001117/pdfft?md5=5ce185f0f6cdff92a0109e627ec1ac63&pid=1-s2.0-S0163445324001117-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of autumn 2023 COVID-19 vaccination and residual protection of prior doses against hospitalisation in England, estimated using a test-negative case-control study\",\"authors\":\"Freja C.M. Kirsebom ,&nbsp;Julia Stowe ,&nbsp;Jamie Lopez Bernal ,&nbsp;Alex Allen ,&nbsp;Nick Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The last COVID-19 vaccine offered to all adults in England became available from November 2021. The most recent booster programme commenced in September 2023. Bivalent BA.4–5 or monovalent XBB.1.5 boosters were given. During the study period, the JN.1 variant became dominant in England.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation was estimated throughout using the test-negative case-control study design where positive PCR tests from hospitalised individuals are cases and comparable negative PCR tests are controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation with the test result as the outcome, vaccination status as the primary exposure variable of interest and confounder adjustment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no evidence of residual protection for boosters given as part of previous campaigns. There were 28,916 eligible tests included to estimate the effectiveness of the autumn 2023 boosters in those aged 65 years and older. VE peaked at 50.6% (95% CI: 44.2–56.3%) after 2–4 weeks, followed by waning to 13.6% (95% CI: −11.7 to 33.2%). Estimates were generally higher for the XBB.1.5 booster than the BA.4–5 booster, but this difference was not statistically significant. Point estimates were highest against XBB sub-lineages. Effectiveness was lower against both JN.1 and EG.5.1 variants with confidence intervals non-overlapping with the effectiveness of the XBB sub-lineages at 2–4 weeks for EG.5.1 where VE was 44.5% (95% CI: 20.2–61.4%) and at 5–9 weeks for JN.1 where VE was 26.4% (95%CI: −3.4 to 47.6%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The recent monovalent XBB.1.5 and bivalent BA.4–5 boosters provided comparable and good protection against hospitalisation, however there was evidence of lower VE against hospitalisation of these boosters against JN.1.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001117/pdfft?md5=5ce185f0f6cdff92a0109e627ec1ac63&pid=1-s2.0-S0163445324001117-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001117\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介上一次为英格兰所有成年人提供 COVID-19 疫苗是从 2021 年 11 月开始的。最近一次加强接种计划于 2023 年 9 月开始。接种了二价 BA.4-5 或单价 XBB.1.5 加强剂。在研究期间,JN.1变异株在英格兰占主导地位:采用检测阴性病例对照研究设计,以住院患者的 PCR 检测阳性结果为病例,可比的 PCR 检测阴性结果为对照,估算疫苗对住院治疗的有效性。采用多变量逻辑回归评估疫苗对住院治疗的有效性,以检测结果为结果,疫苗接种情况为主要相关暴露变量,并对混杂因素进行调整:结果:没有证据表明在以前的疫苗接种活动中接种的疫苗会产生剩余保护作用。共有 28,916 例符合条件的检测结果被纳入其中,以估算 2023 年秋季加强接种对 65 岁及以上人群的有效性。2-4周后,VE达到峰值50.6%(95% CI:44.2-56.3%),随后减弱至13.6%(95% CI:-11.7-33.2%)。XBB.1.5强化剂的估计值普遍高于BA.4-5强化剂,但这种差异在统计学上并不显著。针对 XBB 亚系的点估计值最高。对JN.1和EG.5.1变异株的有效性较低,置信区间与XBB亚系的有效性不重合,2-4周时EG.5.1的VE为44.5%(95%CI:20.2-61.4%),5-9周时JN.1的VE为26.4%(95%CI:-3.4-47.6%):最近的单价XBB.1.5和双价BA.4-5加强剂提供了类似的、良好的住院保护,但有证据表明,这些加强剂对JN.1的住院保护VE较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of autumn 2023 COVID-19 vaccination and residual protection of prior doses against hospitalisation in England, estimated using a test-negative case-control study

Introduction

The last COVID-19 vaccine offered to all adults in England became available from November 2021. The most recent booster programme commenced in September 2023. Bivalent BA.4–5 or monovalent XBB.1.5 boosters were given. During the study period, the JN.1 variant became dominant in England.

Methods

Vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation was estimated throughout using the test-negative case-control study design where positive PCR tests from hospitalised individuals are cases and comparable negative PCR tests are controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation with the test result as the outcome, vaccination status as the primary exposure variable of interest and confounder adjustment.

Results

There was no evidence of residual protection for boosters given as part of previous campaigns. There were 28,916 eligible tests included to estimate the effectiveness of the autumn 2023 boosters in those aged 65 years and older. VE peaked at 50.6% (95% CI: 44.2–56.3%) after 2–4 weeks, followed by waning to 13.6% (95% CI: −11.7 to 33.2%). Estimates were generally higher for the XBB.1.5 booster than the BA.4–5 booster, but this difference was not statistically significant. Point estimates were highest against XBB sub-lineages. Effectiveness was lower against both JN.1 and EG.5.1 variants with confidence intervals non-overlapping with the effectiveness of the XBB sub-lineages at 2–4 weeks for EG.5.1 where VE was 44.5% (95% CI: 20.2–61.4%) and at 5–9 weeks for JN.1 where VE was 26.4% (95%CI: −3.4 to 47.6%).

Conclusions

The recent monovalent XBB.1.5 and bivalent BA.4–5 boosters provided comparable and good protection against hospitalisation, however there was evidence of lower VE against hospitalisation of these boosters against JN.1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection
Journal of Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
45.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
475
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection. Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信