【高危急性心肌梗死患者的冠状动脉内溶栓治疗】。

Journal of cardiography. Supplement Pub Date : 1986-01-01
K Mitsudo, T Fujino, K Matsunaga, O Doi, Y Nishihara, J Awa, T Goto, T Hase, K Kadota, M Kin
{"title":"【高危急性心肌梗死患者的冠状动脉内溶栓治疗】。","authors":"K Mitsudo,&nbsp;T Fujino,&nbsp;K Matsunaga,&nbsp;O Doi,&nbsp;Y Nishihara,&nbsp;J Awa,&nbsp;T Goto,&nbsp;T Hase,&nbsp;K Kadota,&nbsp;M Kin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fifty-four patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were treated by percutaneous transluminal coronary recanalization (PTCR) within six hours after onset of symptoms or at the time of emergency coronary angiography. Of these, six patients had neither good collaterals nor recanalization, and followed by mechanical failure due to rupture of the left ventricular free wall or interventricular septum in five patients despite antihypertensive therapy. In the remaining 48 patients with good collaterals or recanalization, mechanical failure was statistically infrequent and occurred in only two patients (p less than 0.001). Ninety-four patients treated by PTCR were assessed in terms of mortality, cause of death and their hemodynamic findings. Cardiac deaths occurred in nine patients (9.6%); mechanical failure, in four; and cardiogenic shock due to the occlusion of the left main trunk, in five. Cardiac death was more frequently encountered in the era of the initial stage of PTCR (six of 53 cases: 11.3%) and the main cause was mechanical failure (four of six cases). On the other hand, cardiac death in recent years of PTCR was less (three of 41 cases: 7.3%), and all three had pump failure due to the occlusion of the left main trunk. Risk of mechanical failure was successfully resolved using intra-aortic balloon pumping and beta-blocker in addition to antihypertensive therapy. At the present time, PTCR and other supplementary therapy mentioned above reduced the mortality from mechanical failure and cardiogenic shock, but occlusion of the left main trunk remains an important cause of death in patients with AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":77861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiography. Supplement","volume":" 10","pages":"47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Intracoronary thrombolysis for high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction].\",\"authors\":\"K Mitsudo,&nbsp;T Fujino,&nbsp;K Matsunaga,&nbsp;O Doi,&nbsp;Y Nishihara,&nbsp;J Awa,&nbsp;T Goto,&nbsp;T Hase,&nbsp;K Kadota,&nbsp;M Kin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fifty-four patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were treated by percutaneous transluminal coronary recanalization (PTCR) within six hours after onset of symptoms or at the time of emergency coronary angiography. Of these, six patients had neither good collaterals nor recanalization, and followed by mechanical failure due to rupture of the left ventricular free wall or interventricular septum in five patients despite antihypertensive therapy. In the remaining 48 patients with good collaterals or recanalization, mechanical failure was statistically infrequent and occurred in only two patients (p less than 0.001). Ninety-four patients treated by PTCR were assessed in terms of mortality, cause of death and their hemodynamic findings. Cardiac deaths occurred in nine patients (9.6%); mechanical failure, in four; and cardiogenic shock due to the occlusion of the left main trunk, in five. Cardiac death was more frequently encountered in the era of the initial stage of PTCR (six of 53 cases: 11.3%) and the main cause was mechanical failure (four of six cases). On the other hand, cardiac death in recent years of PTCR was less (three of 41 cases: 7.3%), and all three had pump failure due to the occlusion of the left main trunk. Risk of mechanical failure was successfully resolved using intra-aortic balloon pumping and beta-blocker in addition to antihypertensive therapy. At the present time, PTCR and other supplementary therapy mentioned above reduced the mortality from mechanical failure and cardiogenic shock, but occlusion of the left main trunk remains an important cause of death in patients with AMI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiography. Supplement\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\"47-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiography. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiography. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

54例急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者在出现症状后6小时内或急诊冠状动脉造影时行经皮冠状动脉腔内再通术(PTCR)治疗。其中,6例患者既没有良好的侧支也没有再通,5例患者尽管接受了抗高血压治疗,但仍因左心室游离壁或室间隔破裂而出现机械故障。在其余48例侧支良好或再通的患者中,机械故障统计上不常见,仅发生在2例患者中(p < 0.001)。对94例经PTCR治疗的患者的死亡率、死亡原因和血流动力学结果进行评估。心脏性死亡9例(9.6%);机械故障占四分之一;由于左主干闭塞引起的心源性休克,五分钟。心源性死亡多发于PTCR初期(53例中6例:11.3%),主要原因为机械故障(6例中4例)。另一方面,近年来PTCR的心源性死亡较少(41例中有3例:7.3%),且3例均因左主干闭塞导致泵衰竭。在抗高血压治疗的基础上,采用主动脉内气囊泵送和β受体阻滞剂成功地解决了机械故障的风险。目前,PTCR等辅助治疗降低了机械衰竭和心源性休克的死亡率,但左主干闭塞仍然是AMI患者死亡的重要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Intracoronary thrombolysis for high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction].

Fifty-four patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were treated by percutaneous transluminal coronary recanalization (PTCR) within six hours after onset of symptoms or at the time of emergency coronary angiography. Of these, six patients had neither good collaterals nor recanalization, and followed by mechanical failure due to rupture of the left ventricular free wall or interventricular septum in five patients despite antihypertensive therapy. In the remaining 48 patients with good collaterals or recanalization, mechanical failure was statistically infrequent and occurred in only two patients (p less than 0.001). Ninety-four patients treated by PTCR were assessed in terms of mortality, cause of death and their hemodynamic findings. Cardiac deaths occurred in nine patients (9.6%); mechanical failure, in four; and cardiogenic shock due to the occlusion of the left main trunk, in five. Cardiac death was more frequently encountered in the era of the initial stage of PTCR (six of 53 cases: 11.3%) and the main cause was mechanical failure (four of six cases). On the other hand, cardiac death in recent years of PTCR was less (three of 41 cases: 7.3%), and all three had pump failure due to the occlusion of the left main trunk. Risk of mechanical failure was successfully resolved using intra-aortic balloon pumping and beta-blocker in addition to antihypertensive therapy. At the present time, PTCR and other supplementary therapy mentioned above reduced the mortality from mechanical failure and cardiogenic shock, but occlusion of the left main trunk remains an important cause of death in patients with AMI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信