用于识别软组织肉瘤术后进展的放射组学特征的多机构验证。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yuan Yu, Hongwei Guo, Meng Zhang, Feng Hou, Shifeng Yang, Chencui Huang, Lisha Duan, Hexiang Wang
{"title":"用于识别软组织肉瘤术后进展的放射组学特征的多机构验证。","authors":"Yuan Yu, Hongwei Guo, Meng Zhang, Feng Hou, Shifeng Yang, Chencui Huang, Lisha Duan, Hexiang Wang","doi":"10.1186/s40644-024-00705-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics signature for evaluating the risk of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) disease progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 335 patients with STS (training, validation, and The Cancer Imaging Archive sets, n = 168, n = 123, and n = 44, respectively) who underwent surgical resection. Regions of interest were manually delineated using two MRI sequences. Among 12 machine learning-predicted signatures, the best signature was selected, and its prediction score was inputted into Cox regression analysis to build the radiomics signature. A nomogram was created by combining the radiomics signature with a clinical model constructed using MRI and clinical features. Progression-free survival was analyzed in all patients. We assessed performance and clinical utility of the models with reference to the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve, concordance index, integrated Brier score, decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the combined features subset, the minimum redundancy maximum relevance-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression algorithm + decision tree classifier had the best prediction performance. The radiomics signature based on the optimal machine learning-predicted signature, and built using Cox regression analysis, had greater prognostic capability and lower error than the nomogram and clinical model (concordance index, 0.758 and 0.812; area under the curve, 0.724 and 0.757; integrated Brier score, 0.080 and 0.143, in the validation and The Cancer Imaging Archive sets, respectively). The optimal cutoff was - 0.03 and cumulative risk rates were calculated.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>To assess the risk of STS progression, the radiomics signature may have better prognostic power than a nomogram/clinical model.</p>","PeriodicalId":9548,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11077743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-institutional validation of a radiomics signature for identification of postoperative progression of soft tissue sarcoma.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Yu, Hongwei Guo, Meng Zhang, Feng Hou, Shifeng Yang, Chencui Huang, Lisha Duan, Hexiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40644-024-00705-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics signature for evaluating the risk of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) disease progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 335 patients with STS (training, validation, and The Cancer Imaging Archive sets, n = 168, n = 123, and n = 44, respectively) who underwent surgical resection. Regions of interest were manually delineated using two MRI sequences. Among 12 machine learning-predicted signatures, the best signature was selected, and its prediction score was inputted into Cox regression analysis to build the radiomics signature. A nomogram was created by combining the radiomics signature with a clinical model constructed using MRI and clinical features. Progression-free survival was analyzed in all patients. We assessed performance and clinical utility of the models with reference to the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve, concordance index, integrated Brier score, decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the combined features subset, the minimum redundancy maximum relevance-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression algorithm + decision tree classifier had the best prediction performance. The radiomics signature based on the optimal machine learning-predicted signature, and built using Cox regression analysis, had greater prognostic capability and lower error than the nomogram and clinical model (concordance index, 0.758 and 0.812; area under the curve, 0.724 and 0.757; integrated Brier score, 0.080 and 0.143, in the validation and The Cancer Imaging Archive sets, respectively). The optimal cutoff was - 0.03 and cumulative risk rates were calculated.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>To assess the risk of STS progression, the radiomics signature may have better prognostic power than a nomogram/clinical model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11077743/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00705-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00705-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:开发一种基于磁共振成像(MRI)的放射组学特征,用于评估软组织肉瘤(STS)疾病进展风险:开发一种基于磁共振成像(MRI)的放射组学特征,用于评估软组织肉瘤(STS)疾病进展的风险:我们回顾性招募了335名接受手术切除的STS患者(训练集、验证集和癌症成像档案集分别为168人、123人和44人)。感兴趣区使用两种核磁共振成像序列手动划定。在 12 个机器学习预测特征中,选出最佳特征,并将其预测得分输入 Cox 回归分析,以建立放射组学特征。通过将放射组学特征与利用核磁共振成像和临床特征构建的临床模型相结合,建立了一个提名图。对所有患者的无进展生存期进行了分析。我们参考随时间变化的接收者操作特征曲线、曲线下面积、一致性指数、综合布赖尔评分和决策曲线分析,评估了模型的性能和临床实用性:对于组合特征子集,最小冗余最大相关性-最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归算法+决策树分类器的预测效果最好。与提名图和临床模型相比,基于最佳机器学习预测特征并使用 Cox 回归分析建立的放射组学特征具有更强的预后能力和更低的误差(在验证集和癌症影像档案集中,一致性指数分别为 0.758 和 0.812;曲线下面积分别为 0.724 和 0.757;综合 Brier 评分分别为 0.080 和 0.143)。最佳临界值为-0.03,并计算了累积风险率:数据结论:在评估 STS 进展风险时,放射组学特征可能比提名图/临床模型具有更好的预后能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-institutional validation of a radiomics signature for identification of postoperative progression of soft tissue sarcoma.

Background: To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics signature for evaluating the risk of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) disease progression.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 335 patients with STS (training, validation, and The Cancer Imaging Archive sets, n = 168, n = 123, and n = 44, respectively) who underwent surgical resection. Regions of interest were manually delineated using two MRI sequences. Among 12 machine learning-predicted signatures, the best signature was selected, and its prediction score was inputted into Cox regression analysis to build the radiomics signature. A nomogram was created by combining the radiomics signature with a clinical model constructed using MRI and clinical features. Progression-free survival was analyzed in all patients. We assessed performance and clinical utility of the models with reference to the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve, concordance index, integrated Brier score, decision curve analysis.

Results: For the combined features subset, the minimum redundancy maximum relevance-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression algorithm + decision tree classifier had the best prediction performance. The radiomics signature based on the optimal machine learning-predicted signature, and built using Cox regression analysis, had greater prognostic capability and lower error than the nomogram and clinical model (concordance index, 0.758 and 0.812; area under the curve, 0.724 and 0.757; integrated Brier score, 0.080 and 0.143, in the validation and The Cancer Imaging Archive sets, respectively). The optimal cutoff was - 0.03 and cumulative risk rates were calculated.

Data conclusion: To assess the risk of STS progression, the radiomics signature may have better prognostic power than a nomogram/clinical model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Imaging
Cancer Imaging ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles, reviews and editorials written by expert international radiologists working in oncology. The journal encompasses CT, MR, PET, ultrasound, radionuclide and multimodal imaging in all kinds of malignant tumours, plus new developments, techniques and innovations. Topics of interest include: Breast Imaging Chest Complications of treatment Ear, Nose & Throat Gastrointestinal Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Imaging biomarkers Interventional Lymphoma Measurement of tumour response Molecular functional imaging Musculoskeletal Neuro oncology Nuclear Medicine Paediatric.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信