颈动脉钙化评分:定义、分类、应用和限制。

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Neuroradiology Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1177/19714009241252623
Luca Saba, John C Benson, Roberta Scicolone, Kosmas I Paraskevas, Ajay Gupta, Riccardo Cau, Jasjit S Suri, Andreas Schindler, Antonella Balestrieri, Valentina Nardi, Jae W Song, Max Wintermark, Giuseppe Lanzino
{"title":"颈动脉钙化评分:定义、分类、应用和限制。","authors":"Luca Saba, John C Benson, Roberta Scicolone, Kosmas I Paraskevas, Ajay Gupta, Riccardo Cau, Jasjit S Suri, Andreas Schindler, Antonella Balestrieri, Valentina Nardi, Jae W Song, Max Wintermark, Giuseppe Lanzino","doi":"10.1177/19714009241252623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the current paper, the \"carotid artery calcium score\" method is presented with the target to offer a metric method to quantify the amount of calcification in the carotid artery.</p><p><strong>Model and definition: </strong>The Volume of Interest (VOI) should be extracted and those voxels, with a Hounsfield Unit (HU) value ≥130, should be considered. The total weight value is determined by calculating the sum of the HU attenuation values of all voxels with values ≥130 HU. This value should be multiplied by the conversion factor (\"or voxel size\") and divided by a weighting factor, the attenuation threshold to consider a voxel as calcified (and therefore 130 HU): this equation determines the <i>Carotid Artery Calcium Score (CACS)</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In order to provide the demonstration of the potential feasibility of the model, the CACS was calculated in 131 subjects (94 males; mean age 72.7 years) for 235 carotid arteries (in 27 subjects, unilateral plaque was present) considered. The CACS value ranged from 0.67 to 11716. A statistically significant correlation was found (rho value = 0.663, <i>p</i> value = .0001) between the CACS in the right and left carotid plaques. Moreover, a statistically significant correlation between the age and the total CACS was present (rho value = 0.244, <i>p</i> value = .005), whereas no statistically significant difference was found in the distribution of CACS by gender (<i>p</i> = .148). The CACS was also tested at baseline and after contrast and no statistically significant difference was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, this method is of easy application, and it weights at the same time the volume and the degree of calcification in a unique parameter. This method needs to be tested to verify its potential utility, similar to the coronary artery calcium score, for the risk stratification of the occurrence of cerebrovascular events of the anterior circulation. Further studies using this new diagnostic tool to determine the prognostic value of carotid calcium quantification are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"611-619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carotid artery calcium score: Definition, classification, application, and limits.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Saba, John C Benson, Roberta Scicolone, Kosmas I Paraskevas, Ajay Gupta, Riccardo Cau, Jasjit S Suri, Andreas Schindler, Antonella Balestrieri, Valentina Nardi, Jae W Song, Max Wintermark, Giuseppe Lanzino\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19714009241252623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the current paper, the \\\"carotid artery calcium score\\\" method is presented with the target to offer a metric method to quantify the amount of calcification in the carotid artery.</p><p><strong>Model and definition: </strong>The Volume of Interest (VOI) should be extracted and those voxels, with a Hounsfield Unit (HU) value ≥130, should be considered. The total weight value is determined by calculating the sum of the HU attenuation values of all voxels with values ≥130 HU. This value should be multiplied by the conversion factor (\\\"or voxel size\\\") and divided by a weighting factor, the attenuation threshold to consider a voxel as calcified (and therefore 130 HU): this equation determines the <i>Carotid Artery Calcium Score (CACS)</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In order to provide the demonstration of the potential feasibility of the model, the CACS was calculated in 131 subjects (94 males; mean age 72.7 years) for 235 carotid arteries (in 27 subjects, unilateral plaque was present) considered. The CACS value ranged from 0.67 to 11716. A statistically significant correlation was found (rho value = 0.663, <i>p</i> value = .0001) between the CACS in the right and left carotid plaques. Moreover, a statistically significant correlation between the age and the total CACS was present (rho value = 0.244, <i>p</i> value = .005), whereas no statistically significant difference was found in the distribution of CACS by gender (<i>p</i> = .148). The CACS was also tested at baseline and after contrast and no statistically significant difference was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, this method is of easy application, and it weights at the same time the volume and the degree of calcification in a unique parameter. This method needs to be tested to verify its potential utility, similar to the coronary artery calcium score, for the risk stratification of the occurrence of cerebrovascular events of the anterior circulation. Further studies using this new diagnostic tool to determine the prognostic value of carotid calcium quantification are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"611-619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457182/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241252623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241252623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本文提出了 "颈动脉钙化评分 "方法,旨在提供一种量化颈动脉钙化量的度量方法:模型和定义:应提取感兴趣体积(VOI),并考虑 Hounsfield 单位(HU)值≥130 的体素。通过计算所有 HU 值≥130 HU 的体素的 HU 衰减值之和来确定总权重值。该值应乘以转换系数("或体素大小"),再除以加权系数,即将一个体素视为钙化(因此为 130 HU)的衰减阈值:该等式决定了颈动脉钙化评分(CACS):为了证明该模型的潜在可行性,对 131 名受试者(94 名男性;平均年龄 72.7 岁)的 235 条颈动脉(27 名受试者存在单侧斑块)计算了 CACS。CACS 值从 0.67 到 11716 不等。经统计发现,左右颈动脉斑块的 CACS 值之间存在明显的相关性(rho 值 = 0.663,p 值 = .0001)。此外,年龄与总 CACS 之间存在统计学意义上的显著相关性(rho 值 = 0.244,p 值 = .005),而不同性别的 CACS 分布没有统计学意义上的显著差异(p = .148)。此外,还对基线和对比后的 CACS 进行了测试,未发现有统计学意义的差异:总之,该方法应用简便,并能以独特的参数同时权衡钙化的体积和程度。这种方法与冠状动脉钙化评分类似,在前循环脑血管事件的风险分层方面具有潜在的实用性,还需要进行测试验证。还需要使用这一新的诊断工具进行进一步研究,以确定颈动脉钙定量的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carotid artery calcium score: Definition, classification, application, and limits.

Introduction: In the current paper, the "carotid artery calcium score" method is presented with the target to offer a metric method to quantify the amount of calcification in the carotid artery.

Model and definition: The Volume of Interest (VOI) should be extracted and those voxels, with a Hounsfield Unit (HU) value ≥130, should be considered. The total weight value is determined by calculating the sum of the HU attenuation values of all voxels with values ≥130 HU. This value should be multiplied by the conversion factor ("or voxel size") and divided by a weighting factor, the attenuation threshold to consider a voxel as calcified (and therefore 130 HU): this equation determines the Carotid Artery Calcium Score (CACS).

Results: In order to provide the demonstration of the potential feasibility of the model, the CACS was calculated in 131 subjects (94 males; mean age 72.7 years) for 235 carotid arteries (in 27 subjects, unilateral plaque was present) considered. The CACS value ranged from 0.67 to 11716. A statistically significant correlation was found (rho value = 0.663, p value = .0001) between the CACS in the right and left carotid plaques. Moreover, a statistically significant correlation between the age and the total CACS was present (rho value = 0.244, p value = .005), whereas no statistically significant difference was found in the distribution of CACS by gender (p = .148). The CACS was also tested at baseline and after contrast and no statistically significant difference was found.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this method is of easy application, and it weights at the same time the volume and the degree of calcification in a unique parameter. This method needs to be tested to verify its potential utility, similar to the coronary artery calcium score, for the risk stratification of the occurrence of cerebrovascular events of the anterior circulation. Further studies using this new diagnostic tool to determine the prognostic value of carotid calcium quantification are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信