多伦多脑震荡研究报告:特定活动平衡信心量表在普通脑震荡成人中的测量特性。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
{"title":"多伦多脑震荡研究报告:特定活动平衡信心量表在普通脑震荡成人中的测量特性。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The aim of this study was to establish the internal consistency and </span>construct validity of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and ABC-6 in adults from the general population with concussion.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Outpatient concussion care clinic.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults from the general population with concussion referred to a concussion care clinic within 7 days of injury (N=511).</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Balance confidence was assessed with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and the ABC-6. Concussion symptoms were characterized using the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool version 5 (SCAT5) symptom checklist<span>. Instrumented measures of balance and gait included center of pressure velocity and double support time, respectively. Balance was also assessed using the mBESS.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ABC and ABC-6 were strongly correlated (ρ=0.980, <em>P</em><span>&lt;.001). Cronbach α for ABC and ABC-6 was 0.966 and 0.940, respectively. Factor analysis verified the existence of 2 components of the ABC, 1 including all items of the ABC-6 as well as 3 additional items. ABC and ABC-6 were moderately significantly correlated with SCAT5 symptom number, severity, and symptom domain (ρ=−0.350 to −0.604). However, correlations between ABC and ABC-6 with instrumented measures of balance and gait were not statistically significant, except for double support time during dual-task gait with ABC-6 (ρ=−0.218).</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In community-dwelling adults with concussion, the ABC and ABC-6 have good internal consistency. Convergent validity is stronger for symptom endorsement measures within SCAT5 domains, which has a similar construct (subjectivity) to balance confidence. Both the ABC and ABC-6 are valid measures of balance self-efficacy in adults from the general population with concussion. The ABC-6 may be a useful tool for characterizing the effect of concussion on perceptions of the ability to perform functional tasks that challenge balance and mobility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"105 9","pages":"Pages 1718-1724"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement Properties of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale in Adults From the General Population With Concussion: A Report From the Toronto Concussion Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The aim of this study was to establish the internal consistency and </span>construct validity of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and ABC-6 in adults from the general population with concussion.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Outpatient concussion care clinic.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults from the general population with concussion referred to a concussion care clinic within 7 days of injury (N=511).</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Balance confidence was assessed with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and the ABC-6. Concussion symptoms were characterized using the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool version 5 (SCAT5) symptom checklist<span>. Instrumented measures of balance and gait included center of pressure velocity and double support time, respectively. Balance was also assessed using the mBESS.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ABC and ABC-6 were strongly correlated (ρ=0.980, <em>P</em><span>&lt;.001). Cronbach α for ABC and ABC-6 was 0.966 and 0.940, respectively. Factor analysis verified the existence of 2 components of the ABC, 1 including all items of the ABC-6 as well as 3 additional items. ABC and ABC-6 were moderately significantly correlated with SCAT5 symptom number, severity, and symptom domain (ρ=−0.350 to −0.604). However, correlations between ABC and ABC-6 with instrumented measures of balance and gait were not statistically significant, except for double support time during dual-task gait with ABC-6 (ρ=−0.218).</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In community-dwelling adults with concussion, the ABC and ABC-6 have good internal consistency. Convergent validity is stronger for symptom endorsement measures within SCAT5 domains, which has a similar construct (subjectivity) to balance confidence. Both the ABC and ABC-6 are valid measures of balance self-efficacy in adults from the general population with concussion. The ABC-6 may be a useful tool for characterizing the effect of concussion on perceptions of the ability to perform functional tasks that challenge balance and mobility.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"105 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1718-1724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324009912\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324009912","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在确定特定活动平衡信心(ABC)量表和ABC-6在普通脑震荡成人中的内部一致性和构建有效性:设计:前瞻性分析:环境:脑震荡护理门诊:干预措施:不适用:主要结果测量:用特定活动平衡信心量表(ABC)和ABC-6评估平衡信心。脑震荡症状采用运动脑震荡评估工具(SCAT5)症状检查表进行评估。平衡和步态的仪器测量分别包括压力中心(COP)速度和双支撑时间。此外,还使用 mBESS(改良平衡失误评分系统)对平衡能力进行了评估:结果:ABC 和 ABC-6 具有很强的相关性(ρ=0.980,pConclusions):在社区居住的成人脑震荡患者中,ABC 和 ABC-6 具有良好的内部一致性。SCAT5领域中的症状认可测量具有更强的收敛效度,而SCAT5领域中的症状认可测量与平衡信心具有相似的结构(主观性)。ABC和ABC-6都是对患有脑震荡的成年人平衡自我效能的有效测量。ABC-6可能是一种有用的工具,可用于描述脑震荡对完成挑战平衡和活动能力的功能性任务的能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement Properties of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale in Adults From the General Population With Concussion: A Report From the Toronto Concussion Study

Objective

The aim of this study was to establish the internal consistency and construct validity of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and ABC-6 in adults from the general population with concussion.

Design

Prospective analysis.

Setting

Outpatient concussion care clinic.

Participants

Adults from the general population with concussion referred to a concussion care clinic within 7 days of injury (N=511).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Balance confidence was assessed with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and the ABC-6. Concussion symptoms were characterized using the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool version 5 (SCAT5) symptom checklist. Instrumented measures of balance and gait included center of pressure velocity and double support time, respectively. Balance was also assessed using the mBESS.

Results

The ABC and ABC-6 were strongly correlated (ρ=0.980, P<.001). Cronbach α for ABC and ABC-6 was 0.966 and 0.940, respectively. Factor analysis verified the existence of 2 components of the ABC, 1 including all items of the ABC-6 as well as 3 additional items. ABC and ABC-6 were moderately significantly correlated with SCAT5 symptom number, severity, and symptom domain (ρ=−0.350 to −0.604). However, correlations between ABC and ABC-6 with instrumented measures of balance and gait were not statistically significant, except for double support time during dual-task gait with ABC-6 (ρ=−0.218).

Conclusions

In community-dwelling adults with concussion, the ABC and ABC-6 have good internal consistency. Convergent validity is stronger for symptom endorsement measures within SCAT5 domains, which has a similar construct (subjectivity) to balance confidence. Both the ABC and ABC-6 are valid measures of balance self-efficacy in adults from the general population with concussion. The ABC-6 may be a useful tool for characterizing the effect of concussion on perceptions of the ability to perform functional tasks that challenge balance and mobility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信