量化白蚁分解在中生热带稀树草原中的作用

IF 1.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Biotropica Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1111/btp.13333
Katherine Bunney, Mark Robertson, Paul Eggleton, Wayne Twine, Catherine Parr
{"title":"量化白蚁分解在中生热带稀树草原中的作用","authors":"Katherine Bunney,&nbsp;Mark Robertson,&nbsp;Paul Eggleton,&nbsp;Wayne Twine,&nbsp;Catherine Parr","doi":"10.1111/btp.13333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Savanna systems are among the most sensitive to future climate and land-use change, yet we lack robust, direct quantifications of savanna carbon cycling. Together with fire, decomposition is the main process by which the carbon and nutrients are recycled and made available again to plants. Decomposition is largely mediated by microbes and soil invertebrates. Using a novel large-scale termite suppression experiment, we quantify, for the first time, the relative contribution of microbes, termites, and other invertebrates to the decomposition of wood (fresh native and dry non-native), dry dung, and grass in a mesic savanna. We found that termites were responsible for two thirds of the mass loss from dry wood and a third of the mass loss from fresh native wood, dry dung, and dry grass. Microbes were wholly responsible for the difference as there was no evidence of other invertebrates contributing to decomposition, even with fresh wood. Using multiple substrates in savanna decomposition studies is important where a mixture of contrasting life forms occur because both the rates of decomposition and the dominant agent varied considerably. In addition, including both a dry non-native and fresh native wood cast light on possible explanatory variables such as wood density, green-ness and the presence of bark, and the necessity of teasing these variables apart in future studies. Termites stand apart from all other insects in their impact on decomposition within savannas and should be acknowledged alongside microbes and fire as the primary agents of wood, grass, and dry dung turnover in global carbon models.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.13333","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the role of termite decomposition in a mesic savanna\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Bunney,&nbsp;Mark Robertson,&nbsp;Paul Eggleton,&nbsp;Wayne Twine,&nbsp;Catherine Parr\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/btp.13333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Savanna systems are among the most sensitive to future climate and land-use change, yet we lack robust, direct quantifications of savanna carbon cycling. Together with fire, decomposition is the main process by which the carbon and nutrients are recycled and made available again to plants. Decomposition is largely mediated by microbes and soil invertebrates. Using a novel large-scale termite suppression experiment, we quantify, for the first time, the relative contribution of microbes, termites, and other invertebrates to the decomposition of wood (fresh native and dry non-native), dry dung, and grass in a mesic savanna. We found that termites were responsible for two thirds of the mass loss from dry wood and a third of the mass loss from fresh native wood, dry dung, and dry grass. Microbes were wholly responsible for the difference as there was no evidence of other invertebrates contributing to decomposition, even with fresh wood. Using multiple substrates in savanna decomposition studies is important where a mixture of contrasting life forms occur because both the rates of decomposition and the dominant agent varied considerably. In addition, including both a dry non-native and fresh native wood cast light on possible explanatory variables such as wood density, green-ness and the presence of bark, and the necessity of teasing these variables apart in future studies. Termites stand apart from all other insects in their impact on decomposition within savannas and should be acknowledged alongside microbes and fire as the primary agents of wood, grass, and dry dung turnover in global carbon models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotropica\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.13333\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotropica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.13333\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.13333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热带稀树草原系统是对未来气候和土地利用变化最敏感的系统之一,但我们缺乏对热带稀树草原碳循环的可靠、直接的量化数据。与火灾一起,分解是碳和养分得以循环并重新为植物所利用的主要过程。分解主要由微生物和土壤无脊椎动物介导。通过一项新颖的大规模白蚁抑制实验,我们首次量化了微生物、白蚁和其他无脊椎动物对中生热带稀树草原中木材(新鲜本地木材和干燥非本地木材)、干粪和草的分解所起的相对作用。我们发现,白蚁造成干木材质量损失的三分之二,造成新鲜本地木材、干粪便和干草质量损失的三分之一。微生物是造成这种差异的全部原因,因为没有证据表明其他无脊椎动物参与了分解,即使是新鲜木材也是如此。在热带稀树草原分解研究中使用多种基质是很重要的,因为在混合了不同生命形式的情况下,分解速度和主要媒介都有很大差异。此外,既包括干燥的非本地木材,也包括新鲜的本地木材,这些都说明了可能的解释变量,如木材密度、绿色程度和树皮的存在,以及在未来的研究中将这些变量区分开来的必要性。白蚁对热带稀树草原分解的影响有别于其他所有昆虫,在全球碳模型中,白蚁应与微生物和火一起被视为木材、草和干粪周转的主要媒介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quantifying the role of termite decomposition in a mesic savanna

Quantifying the role of termite decomposition in a mesic savanna

Quantifying the role of termite decomposition in a mesic savanna

Savanna systems are among the most sensitive to future climate and land-use change, yet we lack robust, direct quantifications of savanna carbon cycling. Together with fire, decomposition is the main process by which the carbon and nutrients are recycled and made available again to plants. Decomposition is largely mediated by microbes and soil invertebrates. Using a novel large-scale termite suppression experiment, we quantify, for the first time, the relative contribution of microbes, termites, and other invertebrates to the decomposition of wood (fresh native and dry non-native), dry dung, and grass in a mesic savanna. We found that termites were responsible for two thirds of the mass loss from dry wood and a third of the mass loss from fresh native wood, dry dung, and dry grass. Microbes were wholly responsible for the difference as there was no evidence of other invertebrates contributing to decomposition, even with fresh wood. Using multiple substrates in savanna decomposition studies is important where a mixture of contrasting life forms occur because both the rates of decomposition and the dominant agent varied considerably. In addition, including both a dry non-native and fresh native wood cast light on possible explanatory variables such as wood density, green-ness and the presence of bark, and the necessity of teasing these variables apart in future studies. Termites stand apart from all other insects in their impact on decomposition within savannas and should be acknowledged alongside microbes and fire as the primary agents of wood, grass, and dry dung turnover in global carbon models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biotropica
Biotropica 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信