主要经济体住宅建筑去碳化政策的比较分析:欧盟、中国和印度的启示

IF 3.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Chun Xia-Bauer, Sriraj Gokarakonda, Siyue Guo, Faidra Filippidou, Stefan Thomas, Jyoti R. Maheshwari, Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan
{"title":"主要经济体住宅建筑去碳化政策的比较分析:欧盟、中国和印度的启示","authors":"Chun Xia-Bauer,&nbsp;Sriraj Gokarakonda,&nbsp;Siyue Guo,&nbsp;Faidra Filippidou,&nbsp;Stefan Thomas,&nbsp;Jyoti R. Maheshwari,&nbsp;Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan","doi":"10.1007/s12053-024-10225-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The global building sector, responsible for over 30% of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, necessitates urgent decarbonization efforts. This paper examines residential building decarbonization policies in three major economies—the European Union (EU), China, and India. It provides an overview of diverse policies through policy landscape analysis and delves into the design specifics with a detailed policy intensity analysis of building energy codes, information disclosure, and financial incentives in each region. Our findings reveal a diverse mix of policies targeting residential building decarbonization in all three regions. While the EU and China have long-established diverse policy instruments, India's building energy efficiency policies are relatively recent and limited. Detailed analyses of building energy codes, information disclosure, and financial incentives expose variations in ambition, scope, and implementation, even with shared policy instruments. Significant advancements in building energy codes, particularly in stringency and compliance checks, are evident in the EU and China. Conversely, India faces a notable obstacle with limited adoption of residential building energy codes, impacting its journey towards net-zero. The EU leads in building energy labelling policies, while China and India encounter various challenges hindering widespread implementation. Financial incentives across the three regions predominantly take the form of subsidies, potentially straining public budgets. The study concludes with reflections on the pressing need for future research extending beyond the operational phase of buildings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12053-024-10225-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of residential building decarbonization policies in major economies: insights from the EU, China, and India\",\"authors\":\"Chun Xia-Bauer,&nbsp;Sriraj Gokarakonda,&nbsp;Siyue Guo,&nbsp;Faidra Filippidou,&nbsp;Stefan Thomas,&nbsp;Jyoti R. Maheshwari,&nbsp;Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12053-024-10225-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The global building sector, responsible for over 30% of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, necessitates urgent decarbonization efforts. This paper examines residential building decarbonization policies in three major economies—the European Union (EU), China, and India. It provides an overview of diverse policies through policy landscape analysis and delves into the design specifics with a detailed policy intensity analysis of building energy codes, information disclosure, and financial incentives in each region. Our findings reveal a diverse mix of policies targeting residential building decarbonization in all three regions. While the EU and China have long-established diverse policy instruments, India's building energy efficiency policies are relatively recent and limited. Detailed analyses of building energy codes, information disclosure, and financial incentives expose variations in ambition, scope, and implementation, even with shared policy instruments. Significant advancements in building energy codes, particularly in stringency and compliance checks, are evident in the EU and China. Conversely, India faces a notable obstacle with limited adoption of residential building energy codes, impacting its journey towards net-zero. The EU leads in building energy labelling policies, while China and India encounter various challenges hindering widespread implementation. Financial incentives across the three regions predominantly take the form of subsidies, potentially straining public budgets. The study concludes with reflections on the pressing need for future research extending beyond the operational phase of buildings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12053-024-10225-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10225-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10225-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球建筑行业排放的二氧化碳占总排放量的 30%以上,因此迫切需要进行脱碳努力。本文研究了三个主要经济体--欧盟(EU)、中国和印度的住宅建筑去碳化政策。本文通过政策景观分析概述了各种政策,并通过对各地区建筑节能规范、信息披露和财政激励措施的详细政策强度分析,深入探讨了具体设计。我们的研究结果表明,在所有这三个地区,针对住宅建筑脱碳的政策组合多种多样。欧盟和中国早已制定了多种多样的政策工具,而印度的建筑节能政策则相对较新且有限。对建筑节能法规、信息披露和财政激励措施的详细分析表明,即使采用共同的政策工具,在目标、范围和实施方面也存在差异。欧盟和中国在建筑节能法规方面取得了显著进步,尤其是在严格性和合规性检查方面。与此相反,印度在住宅建筑节能法规的采用方面面临着明显的障碍,影响了其实现净零排放的进程。欧盟在建筑能耗标识政策方面处于领先地位,而中国和印度则遇到了阻碍广泛实施的各种挑战。这三个地区的财政激励措施主要采取补贴的形式,可能会对公共预算造成压力。本研究最后对未来研究的迫切需要进行了反思,并将研究延伸到建筑物的运行阶段之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative analysis of residential building decarbonization policies in major economies: insights from the EU, China, and India

Comparative analysis of residential building decarbonization policies in major economies: insights from the EU, China, and India

The global building sector, responsible for over 30% of CO2 emissions, necessitates urgent decarbonization efforts. This paper examines residential building decarbonization policies in three major economies—the European Union (EU), China, and India. It provides an overview of diverse policies through policy landscape analysis and delves into the design specifics with a detailed policy intensity analysis of building energy codes, information disclosure, and financial incentives in each region. Our findings reveal a diverse mix of policies targeting residential building decarbonization in all three regions. While the EU and China have long-established diverse policy instruments, India's building energy efficiency policies are relatively recent and limited. Detailed analyses of building energy codes, information disclosure, and financial incentives expose variations in ambition, scope, and implementation, even with shared policy instruments. Significant advancements in building energy codes, particularly in stringency and compliance checks, are evident in the EU and China. Conversely, India faces a notable obstacle with limited adoption of residential building energy codes, impacting its journey towards net-zero. The EU leads in building energy labelling policies, while China and India encounter various challenges hindering widespread implementation. Financial incentives across the three regions predominantly take the form of subsidies, potentially straining public budgets. The study concludes with reflections on the pressing need for future research extending beyond the operational phase of buildings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信