青少年的囚禁模式:学生人口统计特征与近端学业和心理健康结果的关系

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Stephanie A. Moore, Delwin Carter, Eui Kyung Kim, Michael J. Furlong, Karen Nylund-Gibson, Erin Dowdy
{"title":"青少年的囚禁模式:学生人口统计特征与近端学业和心理健康结果的关系","authors":"Stephanie A. Moore, Delwin Carter, Eui Kyung Kim, Michael J. Furlong, Karen Nylund-Gibson, Erin Dowdy","doi":"10.1007/s12310-024-09663-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Identifying and promoting students’ social-emotional strengths is essential in building their mental health. Covitality, representing the co-occurrence of psychological strengths, is a helpful framework for characterizing students’ well-being. This study used latent profile analysis to identify adolescents’ (<i>n</i> = 11,217; 50.3% female, 37.8% male; grades 9 [33.7%], 10 [21.0%], 11 [28.9%], and 12 [16.5%]) covitality patterns across 12 social-emotional health domains. We investigated whether student demographic characteristics (i.e., sex, parent educational attainment, ethnic identification) were related to profile membership. We further examined profiles’ relations to students’ proximal academic and mental health outcomes, including self-reported grades, school connectedness, life satisfaction, and psychological distress. Four covitality profiles were identified—<i>High, Moderate-High, Moderate-Low,</i> and <i>Low</i>. Profile membership was statistically significantly related to students’ sex and socioeconomic circumstances but with small effect sizes. We identified consistent differences across covitality profiles on student self-reported proximal outcomes. Overall, students in profiles with higher covitality levels (<i>High</i> and <i>Moderate-High</i>) reported (a) higher grades, school connectedness, and life satisfaction and (b) less psychological distress, with students in the <i>High</i> profile reporting the most favorable outcomes. Assessing students’ strengths and providing interventions focused on building strengths across domains are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":51538,"journal":{"name":"School Mental Health","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adolescents’ Covitality Patterns: Relations with Student Demographic Characteristics and Proximal Academic and Mental Health Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie A. Moore, Delwin Carter, Eui Kyung Kim, Michael J. Furlong, Karen Nylund-Gibson, Erin Dowdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12310-024-09663-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Identifying and promoting students’ social-emotional strengths is essential in building their mental health. Covitality, representing the co-occurrence of psychological strengths, is a helpful framework for characterizing students’ well-being. This study used latent profile analysis to identify adolescents’ (<i>n</i> = 11,217; 50.3% female, 37.8% male; grades 9 [33.7%], 10 [21.0%], 11 [28.9%], and 12 [16.5%]) covitality patterns across 12 social-emotional health domains. We investigated whether student demographic characteristics (i.e., sex, parent educational attainment, ethnic identification) were related to profile membership. We further examined profiles’ relations to students’ proximal academic and mental health outcomes, including self-reported grades, school connectedness, life satisfaction, and psychological distress. Four covitality profiles were identified—<i>High, Moderate-High, Moderate-Low,</i> and <i>Low</i>. Profile membership was statistically significantly related to students’ sex and socioeconomic circumstances but with small effect sizes. We identified consistent differences across covitality profiles on student self-reported proximal outcomes. Overall, students in profiles with higher covitality levels (<i>High</i> and <i>Moderate-High</i>) reported (a) higher grades, school connectedness, and life satisfaction and (b) less psychological distress, with students in the <i>High</i> profile reporting the most favorable outcomes. Assessing students’ strengths and providing interventions focused on building strengths across domains are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09663-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09663-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发现和促进学生的社会情感优势对于培养他们的心理健康至关重要。共存性(Covitality)代表了心理优势的共存性,是描述学生幸福感的一个有用框架。本研究采用潜在特征分析来确定青少年(人数=11,217;50.3%为女性,37.8%为男性;年级9 [33.7%]、10 [21.0%]、11 [28.9%]和12 [16.5%])在12个社会情感健康领域的共生模式。我们研究了学生的人口统计学特征(即性别、父母的教育程度、种族认同)是否与档案成员有关。我们进一步研究了特征与学生近端学业和心理健康结果的关系,包括自我报告的成绩、学校联系、生活满意度和心理困扰。我们确定了四种共变量特征--高、中高、中低和低。从统计学角度看,这些特征与学生的性别和社会经济状况有明显关系,但影响程度较小。我们发现,在学生自我报告的近端结果方面,不同共现性特征之间存在一致的差异。总体而言,共生程度较高("高 "和 "中高")的学生报告了(a)较高的成绩、学校联系和生活满意度,以及(b)较少的心理困扰,其中 "高 "的学生报告了最有利的结果。建议对学生的优势进行评估,并提供以培养各领域优势为重点的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adolescents’ Covitality Patterns: Relations with Student Demographic Characteristics and Proximal Academic and Mental Health Outcomes

Adolescents’ Covitality Patterns: Relations with Student Demographic Characteristics and Proximal Academic and Mental Health Outcomes

Identifying and promoting students’ social-emotional strengths is essential in building their mental health. Covitality, representing the co-occurrence of psychological strengths, is a helpful framework for characterizing students’ well-being. This study used latent profile analysis to identify adolescents’ (n = 11,217; 50.3% female, 37.8% male; grades 9 [33.7%], 10 [21.0%], 11 [28.9%], and 12 [16.5%]) covitality patterns across 12 social-emotional health domains. We investigated whether student demographic characteristics (i.e., sex, parent educational attainment, ethnic identification) were related to profile membership. We further examined profiles’ relations to students’ proximal academic and mental health outcomes, including self-reported grades, school connectedness, life satisfaction, and psychological distress. Four covitality profiles were identified—High, Moderate-High, Moderate-Low, and Low. Profile membership was statistically significantly related to students’ sex and socioeconomic circumstances but with small effect sizes. We identified consistent differences across covitality profiles on student self-reported proximal outcomes. Overall, students in profiles with higher covitality levels (High and Moderate-High) reported (a) higher grades, school connectedness, and life satisfaction and (b) less psychological distress, with students in the High profile reporting the most favorable outcomes. Assessing students’ strengths and providing interventions focused on building strengths across domains are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal is a forum for the latest research related to prevention, treatment, and assessment practices that are associated with the pre-K to 12th-grade education system and focuses on children and adolescents with emotional and behavioral disorders. The journal publishes empirical studies, quantitative and qualitative research, and systematic and scoping review articles from authors representing the many disciplines that are involved in school mental health, including child and school psychology, education, pediatrics, child and adolescent psychiatry, developmental psychology, school counseling, social work and nursing.  Sample topics include: ·         Innovative school-based treatment practices·         Consultation and professional development procedures·         Dissemination and implementation science targeting schools·         Educational techniques for children with emotional and behavioral disorders·         Schoolwide prevention programs·         Medication effects on school behavior and achievement·         Assessment practices·         Special education services·         Developmental implications affecting learning and behavior·         Racial, ethnic, and cultural issues·         School policy·         Role of families in school mental health·         Prediction of impairment and resilience·         Moderators and mediators of response to treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信