利用野外地震地磁测量对主地磁场的世俗变化进行校正的方法

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Shu-Peng Su, Zhao-Jing Wang, De-Qiang Liu, Feng-Long Mao
{"title":"利用野外地震地磁测量对主地磁场的世俗变化进行校正的方法","authors":"Shu-Peng Su, Zhao-Jing Wang, De-Qiang Liu, Feng-Long Mao","doi":"10.1007/s11770-023-1071-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Using the repeated survey data from field stations and the weighted least-squares method, this study obtained the long-term correction results of the measurement data and compared these results with those of current methods. The results were as follows: 1. The new method substantially improved long-term spatial distortion compared to the old method. The secular variation (SV) results of the main geomagnetic field produced by the new method have a higher linear correlation to those of the international geomagnetic reference field (IGRF)_SV model. The mean square error (MSE) of the difference in the three elements F, D, and I between the new method and the IGRF_SV model is 10.7%, 47.0%, and 14.5% of that of the original method, respectively. 2. Applying the new SV correction method obtains more stable and reasonable variations in Earth’s crustal magnetic field. The average amplitude of the Earth’s crustal magnetic field variation in F, D, and I is 28.5%, 55.4%, and 34.4 of the original results, the MSE is 59.1%, 56.5%, and 40.3% of the original results, and the mean gradient is 93.6%, 91.9%, and 97.0%, respectively. 3. In the processed results of the new method, the seismomagnetic information is clearly optimized, and the epicenter location is more consistent with the 0 value line of the Earth’s crustal magnetic field. The processed results of the new method are considerably better than those of the original method and have a higher application value.</p>","PeriodicalId":55500,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geophysics","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction method for secular variation in the main geomagnetic field using a field seismogeomagnetic survey\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Peng Su, Zhao-Jing Wang, De-Qiang Liu, Feng-Long Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11770-023-1071-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Using the repeated survey data from field stations and the weighted least-squares method, this study obtained the long-term correction results of the measurement data and compared these results with those of current methods. The results were as follows: 1. The new method substantially improved long-term spatial distortion compared to the old method. The secular variation (SV) results of the main geomagnetic field produced by the new method have a higher linear correlation to those of the international geomagnetic reference field (IGRF)_SV model. The mean square error (MSE) of the difference in the three elements F, D, and I between the new method and the IGRF_SV model is 10.7%, 47.0%, and 14.5% of that of the original method, respectively. 2. Applying the new SV correction method obtains more stable and reasonable variations in Earth’s crustal magnetic field. The average amplitude of the Earth’s crustal magnetic field variation in F, D, and I is 28.5%, 55.4%, and 34.4 of the original results, the MSE is 59.1%, 56.5%, and 40.3% of the original results, and the mean gradient is 93.6%, 91.9%, and 97.0%, respectively. 3. In the processed results of the new method, the seismomagnetic information is clearly optimized, and the epicenter location is more consistent with the 0 value line of the Earth’s crustal magnetic field. The processed results of the new method are considerably better than those of the original method and have a higher application value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-023-1071-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-023-1071-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用野外台站的重复调查数据和加权最小二乘法,获得了测量数据的长期校正结果,并将这些结果与现行方法进行了比较。结果如下1.与旧方法相比,新方法大大改善了长期空间失真。新方法产生的主地磁场世俗变化(SV)结果与国际地磁参考场(IGRF)_SV 模型的结果具有更高的线性相关性。新方法与 IGRF_SV 模型的 F、D、I 三元素差值的均方误差(MSE)分别是原方法的 10.7%、47.0% 和 14.5%。2.2. 应用新的 SV 修正方法可获得更稳定、更合理的地壳磁场变化。F、D、I 三区地壳磁场变化的平均振幅分别是原方法的 28.5%、55.4% 和 34.4,MSE 分别是原方法的 59.1%、56.5% 和 40.3%,平均梯度分别是原方法的 93.6%、91.9% 和 97.0%。3.在新方法的处理结果中,地震地磁信息明显优化,震中位置与地壳磁场 0 值线更加一致。新方法的处理结果明显优于原方法的处理结果,具有较高的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correction method for secular variation in the main geomagnetic field using a field seismogeomagnetic survey

Using the repeated survey data from field stations and the weighted least-squares method, this study obtained the long-term correction results of the measurement data and compared these results with those of current methods. The results were as follows: 1. The new method substantially improved long-term spatial distortion compared to the old method. The secular variation (SV) results of the main geomagnetic field produced by the new method have a higher linear correlation to those of the international geomagnetic reference field (IGRF)_SV model. The mean square error (MSE) of the difference in the three elements F, D, and I between the new method and the IGRF_SV model is 10.7%, 47.0%, and 14.5% of that of the original method, respectively. 2. Applying the new SV correction method obtains more stable and reasonable variations in Earth’s crustal magnetic field. The average amplitude of the Earth’s crustal magnetic field variation in F, D, and I is 28.5%, 55.4%, and 34.4 of the original results, the MSE is 59.1%, 56.5%, and 40.3% of the original results, and the mean gradient is 93.6%, 91.9%, and 97.0%, respectively. 3. In the processed results of the new method, the seismomagnetic information is clearly optimized, and the epicenter location is more consistent with the 0 value line of the Earth’s crustal magnetic field. The processed results of the new method are considerably better than those of the original method and have a higher application value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Geophysics
Applied Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
912
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The journal is designed to provide an academic realm for a broad blend of academic and industry papers to promote rapid communication and exchange of ideas between Chinese and world-wide geophysicists. The publication covers the applications of geoscience, geophysics, and related disciplines in the fields of energy, resources, environment, disaster, engineering, information, military, and surveying.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信