HakSoo Ha, Tristan R. Brown, Ryan J. Quinn, Timothy A. Volk, Robert W. Malmsheimer, Marie-Odile P. Fortier, Steven Bick, Jenny R. Frank
{"title":"森林生物质原料供应链的随机技术经济分析:生物能源应用中的清洁和肮脏木片","authors":"HakSoo Ha, Tristan R. Brown, Ryan J. Quinn, Timothy A. Volk, Robert W. Malmsheimer, Marie-Odile P. Fortier, Steven Bick, Jenny R. Frank","doi":"10.1007/s12155-024-10764-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study reports results from a stochastic techno-economic analysis (TEA) model that assessed the financial feasibility of forest biomass harvest for low-carbon bioenergy feedstocks in the hardwood region of the Northeast United States. It analyzed three 24-year scenarios based on primary data collected from the mixed product harvest with whole tree harvesting systems that primarily produce clean chips, dirty chips, or pulpwood and dirty chips. Using a joint product costing approach, proportional costs of shared processes were allocated to different products on a mass basis. Uncertainty associated with key stochastic variables was incorporated into the model to generate net present values (NPV), benefit–cost ratios (BCR), and minimum selling prices (MSP) via Monte Carlo simulation. The clean chip scenario produced an NPV of $1.36 million and a BCR of 1.03, while the pulpwood scenario’s NPV and BCR ($0.06 million and 1.02) were lower, and the dirty chip scenario generated negative NPV (− $0.02 million) and a BCR of 0.99. The probabilities of achieving positive NPVs for all three scenarios fell between 47 and 56%. The mean MSP for one clean chip scenario was $94.03/dry Mg, while the mean MSPs for two dirty chip scenarios were $74.79/dry Mg and $75.93/dry Mg. NPV results were most sensitive to forest biomass feedstock harvesting production levels, transportation distances, and delivered prices, followed by diesel fuel consumption for in-wood harvest and diesel fuel price.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":487,"journal":{"name":"BioEnergy Research","volume":"17 3","pages":"1739 - 1754"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Stochastic Techno-Economic Analysis of Forest Biomass Feedstock Supply Chains: Clean and Dirty Chips for Bioenergy Applications\",\"authors\":\"HakSoo Ha, Tristan R. Brown, Ryan J. Quinn, Timothy A. Volk, Robert W. Malmsheimer, Marie-Odile P. Fortier, Steven Bick, Jenny R. Frank\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12155-024-10764-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study reports results from a stochastic techno-economic analysis (TEA) model that assessed the financial feasibility of forest biomass harvest for low-carbon bioenergy feedstocks in the hardwood region of the Northeast United States. It analyzed three 24-year scenarios based on primary data collected from the mixed product harvest with whole tree harvesting systems that primarily produce clean chips, dirty chips, or pulpwood and dirty chips. Using a joint product costing approach, proportional costs of shared processes were allocated to different products on a mass basis. Uncertainty associated with key stochastic variables was incorporated into the model to generate net present values (NPV), benefit–cost ratios (BCR), and minimum selling prices (MSP) via Monte Carlo simulation. The clean chip scenario produced an NPV of $1.36 million and a BCR of 1.03, while the pulpwood scenario’s NPV and BCR ($0.06 million and 1.02) were lower, and the dirty chip scenario generated negative NPV (− $0.02 million) and a BCR of 0.99. The probabilities of achieving positive NPVs for all three scenarios fell between 47 and 56%. The mean MSP for one clean chip scenario was $94.03/dry Mg, while the mean MSPs for two dirty chip scenarios were $74.79/dry Mg and $75.93/dry Mg. NPV results were most sensitive to forest biomass feedstock harvesting production levels, transportation distances, and delivered prices, followed by diesel fuel consumption for in-wood harvest and diesel fuel price.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioEnergy Research\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"1739 - 1754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioEnergy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-024-10764-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioEnergy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-024-10764-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Stochastic Techno-Economic Analysis of Forest Biomass Feedstock Supply Chains: Clean and Dirty Chips for Bioenergy Applications
This study reports results from a stochastic techno-economic analysis (TEA) model that assessed the financial feasibility of forest biomass harvest for low-carbon bioenergy feedstocks in the hardwood region of the Northeast United States. It analyzed three 24-year scenarios based on primary data collected from the mixed product harvest with whole tree harvesting systems that primarily produce clean chips, dirty chips, or pulpwood and dirty chips. Using a joint product costing approach, proportional costs of shared processes were allocated to different products on a mass basis. Uncertainty associated with key stochastic variables was incorporated into the model to generate net present values (NPV), benefit–cost ratios (BCR), and minimum selling prices (MSP) via Monte Carlo simulation. The clean chip scenario produced an NPV of $1.36 million and a BCR of 1.03, while the pulpwood scenario’s NPV and BCR ($0.06 million and 1.02) were lower, and the dirty chip scenario generated negative NPV (− $0.02 million) and a BCR of 0.99. The probabilities of achieving positive NPVs for all three scenarios fell between 47 and 56%. The mean MSP for one clean chip scenario was $94.03/dry Mg, while the mean MSPs for two dirty chip scenarios were $74.79/dry Mg and $75.93/dry Mg. NPV results were most sensitive to forest biomass feedstock harvesting production levels, transportation distances, and delivered prices, followed by diesel fuel consumption for in-wood harvest and diesel fuel price.
期刊介绍:
BioEnergy Research fills a void in the rapidly growing area of feedstock biology research related to biomass, biofuels, and bioenergy. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including peer-reviewed scientific research, reviews, perspectives and commentary, industry news, and government policy updates. Its coverage brings together a uniquely broad combination of disciplines with a common focus on feedstock biology and science, related to biomass, biofeedstock, and bioenergy production.