Qazi Nasir, Humbul Suleman, Wameath S. Abdul Majeed
{"title":"应用机器学习预测纯成分与水和抑制剂溶液的水合物形成","authors":"Qazi Nasir, Humbul Suleman, Wameath S. Abdul Majeed","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present work investigates the use of machine learning approaches for the prediction of hydrate formation pressure (HFP) in gas hydrate systems. Advanced machine learning models, including the decision tree regressor (DTR), random forest regressor (RFR), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), gradient boosting regressor (GBR), histogram gradient boosting regressor (HGBR), and CatBoost regressor (CB), are trained and evaluated on a large dataset consists of 3137 experimental data points. The models are evaluated using R-squared (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>), mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). The study indicates that for the intent of HFP prediction, CatBoost outperformed all other machine learning models. It demonstrated high accuracy on the testing set with an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value of 0.9922, and with the lowest RMSE (1.61 × 10<sup>−3</sup>), MAE (7.90 × 10<sup>−4</sup>), and MSE (2.58 × 10<sup>−6</sup>), CatBoost strengthened its prediction ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9400,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"102 11","pages":"3953-3981"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of machine learning on hydrate formation prediction of pure components with water and inhibitors solution\",\"authors\":\"Qazi Nasir, Humbul Suleman, Wameath S. Abdul Majeed\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjce.25291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present work investigates the use of machine learning approaches for the prediction of hydrate formation pressure (HFP) in gas hydrate systems. Advanced machine learning models, including the decision tree regressor (DTR), random forest regressor (RFR), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), gradient boosting regressor (GBR), histogram gradient boosting regressor (HGBR), and CatBoost regressor (CB), are trained and evaluated on a large dataset consists of 3137 experimental data points. The models are evaluated using R-squared (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>), mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). The study indicates that for the intent of HFP prediction, CatBoost outperformed all other machine learning models. It demonstrated high accuracy on the testing set with an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value of 0.9922, and with the lowest RMSE (1.61 × 10<sup>−3</sup>), MAE (7.90 × 10<sup>−4</sup>), and MSE (2.58 × 10<sup>−6</sup>), CatBoost strengthened its prediction ability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"102 11\",\"pages\":\"3953-3981\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Application of machine learning on hydrate formation prediction of pure components with water and inhibitors solution
The present work investigates the use of machine learning approaches for the prediction of hydrate formation pressure (HFP) in gas hydrate systems. Advanced machine learning models, including the decision tree regressor (DTR), random forest regressor (RFR), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), gradient boosting regressor (GBR), histogram gradient boosting regressor (HGBR), and CatBoost regressor (CB), are trained and evaluated on a large dataset consists of 3137 experimental data points. The models are evaluated using R-squared (R2), mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). The study indicates that for the intent of HFP prediction, CatBoost outperformed all other machine learning models. It demonstrated high accuracy on the testing set with an R2 value of 0.9922, and with the lowest RMSE (1.61 × 10−3), MAE (7.90 × 10−4), and MSE (2.58 × 10−6), CatBoost strengthened its prediction ability.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE) publishes original research articles, new theoretical interpretation or experimental findings and critical reviews in the science or industrial practice of chemical and biochemical processes. Preference is given to papers having a clearly indicated scope and applicability in any of the following areas: Fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, multiphase flows, separations processes, thermodynamics, process systems engineering, reactors and reaction kinetics, catalysis, interfacial phenomena, electrochemical phenomena, bioengineering, minerals processing and natural products and environmental and energy engineering. Papers that merely describe or present a conventional or routine analysis of existing processes will not be considered.