是什么让在线学习日志成为职业教育与培训的有力工具?区分富有成效的使用模式和有效的学习策略

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Beat A. Schwendimann, Gabriel Kappeler, Laetitia Mauroux, Jean-Luc Gurtner
{"title":"是什么让在线学习日志成为职业教育与培训的有力工具?区分富有成效的使用模式和有效的学习策略","authors":"Beat A. Schwendimann, Gabriel Kappeler, Laetitia Mauroux, Jean-Luc Gurtner","doi":"10.1186/s40461-018-0070-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe current and future workforce is challenged to adapt to changing environments and become lifelong, self-regulated learners. Learning journals can regulate learning processes through scaffolding reflection on rich experiences. However, learning journals are not effective per se. This study investigates the effects of an online learning journal platform, called ‘LearnDoc’, that provides scaffolds for learners in their initial vocational education and training. The specific research questions addressed in this paper are what usage patterns emerge from learners’ use of the LearnDoc platform, when do learners create their journal entries, and how do usage patterns and procrastination relate to learners’ final exam performance.MethodsThe LearnDoc platform has been used throughout a 3-year training program by a cohort of Swiss vocational students (N = 132). Different usage patterns (intensity and pacing) and learning strategies (metacognitive and non-metacognitive) were distinguished through a mixed methods approach.ResultsResults indicate a significant link between learning journal pacing patterns and learners’ final assessment performance. Learners who finished with higher grades tended to start generating their learning journals earlier and made more use of the learning strategies “planning, monitoring, debugging” while weaker students focused more on “evaluation”. Findings suggest that students’ perceptions of the purpose of learning journals influence their pacing strategies and selection of learning strategies.ConclusionsThese results are valuable for the design of effective scaffolds for a better and a more reflective usage of learning journals in vocational education and training.","PeriodicalId":38550,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What makes an online learning journal powerful for VET? Distinguishing productive usage patterns and effective learning strategies\",\"authors\":\"Beat A. Schwendimann, Gabriel Kappeler, Laetitia Mauroux, Jean-Luc Gurtner\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40461-018-0070-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThe current and future workforce is challenged to adapt to changing environments and become lifelong, self-regulated learners. Learning journals can regulate learning processes through scaffolding reflection on rich experiences. However, learning journals are not effective per se. This study investigates the effects of an online learning journal platform, called ‘LearnDoc’, that provides scaffolds for learners in their initial vocational education and training. The specific research questions addressed in this paper are what usage patterns emerge from learners’ use of the LearnDoc platform, when do learners create their journal entries, and how do usage patterns and procrastination relate to learners’ final exam performance.MethodsThe LearnDoc platform has been used throughout a 3-year training program by a cohort of Swiss vocational students (N = 132). Different usage patterns (intensity and pacing) and learning strategies (metacognitive and non-metacognitive) were distinguished through a mixed methods approach.ResultsResults indicate a significant link between learning journal pacing patterns and learners’ final assessment performance. Learners who finished with higher grades tended to start generating their learning journals earlier and made more use of the learning strategies “planning, monitoring, debugging” while weaker students focused more on “evaluation”. Findings suggest that students’ perceptions of the purpose of learning journals influence their pacing strategies and selection of learning strategies.ConclusionsThese results are valuable for the design of effective scaffolds for a better and a more reflective usage of learning journals in vocational education and training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-018-0070-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-018-0070-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景当前和未来的劳动力面临着适应不断变化的环境并成为终身自律学习者的挑战。学习日记可以通过对丰富经验的反思来调节学习过程。然而,学习日志本身并不有效。本研究调查了一个名为 "LearnDoc "的在线学习日志平台的效果,该平台为初始职业教育和培训中的学习者提供了学习支架。本文探讨的具体研究问题包括:学习者在使用 LearnDoc 平台的过程中出现了哪些使用模式;学习者何时创建日志条目;使用模式和拖延症与学习者的期末考试成绩有何关系。结果结果表明,学习日志的节奏模式与学习者的期末考试成绩之间存在显著联系。成绩较好的学生往往更早开始撰写学习日志,并更多地使用 "计划、监控、调试 "等学习策略,而成绩较差的学生则更注重 "评价"。研究结果表明,学生对学习日记目的的认识会影响他们的学习步调策略和学习策略的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What makes an online learning journal powerful for VET? Distinguishing productive usage patterns and effective learning strategies
BackgroundThe current and future workforce is challenged to adapt to changing environments and become lifelong, self-regulated learners. Learning journals can regulate learning processes through scaffolding reflection on rich experiences. However, learning journals are not effective per se. This study investigates the effects of an online learning journal platform, called ‘LearnDoc’, that provides scaffolds for learners in their initial vocational education and training. The specific research questions addressed in this paper are what usage patterns emerge from learners’ use of the LearnDoc platform, when do learners create their journal entries, and how do usage patterns and procrastination relate to learners’ final exam performance.MethodsThe LearnDoc platform has been used throughout a 3-year training program by a cohort of Swiss vocational students (N = 132). Different usage patterns (intensity and pacing) and learning strategies (metacognitive and non-metacognitive) were distinguished through a mixed methods approach.ResultsResults indicate a significant link between learning journal pacing patterns and learners’ final assessment performance. Learners who finished with higher grades tended to start generating their learning journals earlier and made more use of the learning strategies “planning, monitoring, debugging” while weaker students focused more on “evaluation”. Findings suggest that students’ perceptions of the purpose of learning journals influence their pacing strategies and selection of learning strategies.ConclusionsThese results are valuable for the design of effective scaffolds for a better and a more reflective usage of learning journals in vocational education and training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
9
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of this journal is to provide a platform for original empirical investigations in the field of professional, vocational and technical education, comparing the effectiveness, efficiency and equity of different vocational education systems at the school, company and systemic level. The journal fills a gap in the existing literature focusing on empirically-oriented academic research and stimulating the interest in strengthening the vocational part of the educational system, both at the basic and higher education level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信