作为财产的实践:柏拉图《共和国》中的正义概念

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
POLIS Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1163/20512996-12340435
L.J.A. Klein
{"title":"作为财产的实践:柏拉图《共和国》中的正义概念","authors":"L.J.A. Klein","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholarship on the Republic has tended to stress the centrality of the tripartite soul to the Republic’s conception of justice. Yet since Socrates’s task in the dialogue is to show the desirability of justice in the ordinary Athenian sense, any emphasis on idiosyncratic psychology would render his account of justice fundamentally beside the point. This paper suggests a way out of this dilemma. It argues that Platonic justice in the Republic represents a shrewd twist on the entirely conventional, distributive Athenian notion of justice as refraining from seizing for oneself what belongs to another. Plato’s twist is to substitute the performance of one’s own activity (<styled-content lang=\"el-Grek\" xmlns:dc=\"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/\" xmlns:ifp=\"http://www.ifactory.com/press\">πρᾶξις τα ἑαυτοῦ</styled-content>) for the possession of one’s household goods (<styled-content lang=\"el-Grek\" xmlns:dc=\"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/\" xmlns:ifp=\"http://www.ifactory.com/press\">ἕξις τα ἑαυτοῦ</styled-content>) as the proper object of justice. The paper then shows how this account of Platonic justice makes sense both textually and contextually, before concluding.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Praxis as Property: the Concept of Justice in Plato’s Republic\",\"authors\":\"L.J.A. Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/20512996-12340435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Scholarship on the Republic has tended to stress the centrality of the tripartite soul to the Republic’s conception of justice. Yet since Socrates’s task in the dialogue is to show the desirability of justice in the ordinary Athenian sense, any emphasis on idiosyncratic psychology would render his account of justice fundamentally beside the point. This paper suggests a way out of this dilemma. It argues that Platonic justice in the Republic represents a shrewd twist on the entirely conventional, distributive Athenian notion of justice as refraining from seizing for oneself what belongs to another. Plato’s twist is to substitute the performance of one’s own activity (<styled-content lang=\\\"el-Grek\\\" xmlns:dc=\\\"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/\\\" xmlns:ifp=\\\"http://www.ifactory.com/press\\\">πρᾶξις τα ἑαυτοῦ</styled-content>) for the possession of one’s household goods (<styled-content lang=\\\"el-Grek\\\" xmlns:dc=\\\"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/\\\" xmlns:ifp=\\\"http://www.ifactory.com/press\\\">ἕξις τα ἑαυτοῦ</styled-content>) as the proper object of justice. The paper then shows how this account of Platonic justice makes sense both textually and contextually, before concluding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POLIS\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POLIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340435\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究《共和国》的学者倾向于强调三方灵魂在《共和国》正义观中的核心地位。然而,由于苏格拉底在对话中的任务是展示普通雅典人意义上的正义的可取性,任何对特异心理学的强调都会使他对正义的论述从根本上失去意义。本文提出了摆脱这一困境的方法。本文认为,《共和国》中柏拉图式的正义是对雅典人完全传统的、分配式的正义概念的精明转折,即不把属于他人的东西据为己有。柏拉图的曲解是以一个人从事自己的活动(πρᾶξις τα ἑαυτοῦ)来取代对一个人的家庭财产(ἕξις τα ἑαυτοῦ)的占有,以此作为正义的适当对象。然后,本文从文本和上下文两方面说明了柏拉图正义论的合理性,最后得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Praxis as Property: the Concept of Justice in Plato’s Republic

Scholarship on the Republic has tended to stress the centrality of the tripartite soul to the Republic’s conception of justice. Yet since Socrates’s task in the dialogue is to show the desirability of justice in the ordinary Athenian sense, any emphasis on idiosyncratic psychology would render his account of justice fundamentally beside the point. This paper suggests a way out of this dilemma. It argues that Platonic justice in the Republic represents a shrewd twist on the entirely conventional, distributive Athenian notion of justice as refraining from seizing for oneself what belongs to another. Plato’s twist is to substitute the performance of one’s own activity (πρᾶξις τα ἑαυτοῦ) for the possession of one’s household goods (ἕξις τα ἑαυτοῦ) as the proper object of justice. The paper then shows how this account of Platonic justice makes sense both textually and contextually, before concluding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
POLIS
POLIS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信