共和国》第二卷中的伙伴关系概念

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
POLIS Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1163/20512996-12340436
Stephen Oppong Peprah
{"title":"共和国》第二卷中的伙伴关系概念","authors":"Stephen Oppong Peprah","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article critically analyses the concept of ‘partnership’ (<em>koinōnia</em>) in Book <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">II</span> of the <em>Republic</em> (Pl. <em>Resp</em>. 369b–374e), a concept it believes grounds Plato’s political thesis. It attempts to determine the nature of the concept, explore the agential capacities of the partnering agents, identify the original and derivative rational principles that could emerge from it, and argue that these rational principles are also moral principles. Platonic social justice spells out one of the rational and moral principles that emerge from the partnership. In this regard, the paper aims to show, <em>inter alia</em>, the connection between Platonic partnership and social justice and how such connection helps to explain, for instance, the quality of relationship that could exist between the rulers and ruled in Kallipolis. Incidentally, the paper compares Platonic partnership in respect of his defence of justice with Glaucon’s contractarian moral thesis in connection with his pean for injustice.</p>","PeriodicalId":43237,"journal":{"name":"POLIS","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Concept of Partnership in Book II of the Republic\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Oppong Peprah\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/20512996-12340436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article critically analyses the concept of ‘partnership’ (<em>koinōnia</em>) in Book <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">II</span> of the <em>Republic</em> (Pl. <em>Resp</em>. 369b–374e), a concept it believes grounds Plato’s political thesis. It attempts to determine the nature of the concept, explore the agential capacities of the partnering agents, identify the original and derivative rational principles that could emerge from it, and argue that these rational principles are also moral principles. Platonic social justice spells out one of the rational and moral principles that emerge from the partnership. In this regard, the paper aims to show, <em>inter alia</em>, the connection between Platonic partnership and social justice and how such connection helps to explain, for instance, the quality of relationship that could exist between the rulers and ruled in Kallipolis. Incidentally, the paper compares Platonic partnership in respect of his defence of justice with Glaucon’s contractarian moral thesis in connection with his pean for injustice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POLIS\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POLIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340436\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340436","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文批判性地分析了《共和国》第二卷(Pl. Resp. 369b-374e)中的 "伙伴关系"(koinōnia)概念,认为这一概念是柏拉图政治论述的基础。该书试图确定这一概念的性质,探索合伙者的行动能力,确定可能从中产生的原始和衍生理性原则,并论证这些理性原则也是道德原则。柏拉图式的社会正义阐明了从伙伴关系中产生的理性和道德原则之一。在这方面,本文旨在特别说明柏拉图式伙伴关系与社会正义之间的联系,以及这种联系如何有助于解释(例如)卡利波利斯统治者与被统治者之间可能存在的关系的质量。顺便提一下,本文将柏拉图式的伙伴关系与格劳孔的契约论道德论作了比较,前者是为正义辩护,后者是为不公正辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Concept of Partnership in Book II of the Republic

This article critically analyses the concept of ‘partnership’ (koinōnia) in Book II of the Republic (Pl. Resp. 369b–374e), a concept it believes grounds Plato’s political thesis. It attempts to determine the nature of the concept, explore the agential capacities of the partnering agents, identify the original and derivative rational principles that could emerge from it, and argue that these rational principles are also moral principles. Platonic social justice spells out one of the rational and moral principles that emerge from the partnership. In this regard, the paper aims to show, inter alia, the connection between Platonic partnership and social justice and how such connection helps to explain, for instance, the quality of relationship that could exist between the rulers and ruled in Kallipolis. Incidentally, the paper compares Platonic partnership in respect of his defence of justice with Glaucon’s contractarian moral thesis in connection with his pean for injustice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
POLIS
POLIS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信