{"title":"在绘制滑坡易发性地图时应纳入哪些生态因素?对支持生态减灾的当前趋势进行探索性审查","authors":"Mélanie Broquet , Pedro Cabral , Felipe S. Campos","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction (Eco-DRR) reflects the important role that natural ecosystems play in reducing the likelihood, severity, and impact of environmental disasters such as landslides. However, landslide risk assessments often lack explicit references to Eco-DRR and unified frameworks, notably for its Landslide Susceptibility Assessment (LSA). Here, we assess how ecological factors are integrated into LSAs and the feasibility of measuring them, using open Earth Observation (EO) data. We conduct an exploratory review for identifying the factors used in LSAs and ecosystem assessments, determining their commonalities. Key findings indicate that standardization is more lacking in ecosystem assessments than in LSAs, with the former exhibiting a higher dispersion of factors—195 identified across 41 papers—compared to the latter, where only 46 factors were identified across 30 studies. LSAs and ecosystem assessments shared 19 common factors, with only two, the Normalized Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), being widely accepted criteria. Our study contributes to advancing Eco-DRR practices by proposing concrete measures to expand the ecological perspective in LSAs and fostering collaboration between DRR and conservation domains. Ultimately, it raises awareness of the pivotal role that healthy ecosystems play in mitigating disasters and addressing societal challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000188/pdfft?md5=4cd8c40b7998bdb7c8e882539551c2ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2590061724000188-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What ecological factors to integrate in landslide susceptibility mapping? An exploratory review of current trends in support of eco-DRR\",\"authors\":\"Mélanie Broquet , Pedro Cabral , Felipe S. Campos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction (Eco-DRR) reflects the important role that natural ecosystems play in reducing the likelihood, severity, and impact of environmental disasters such as landslides. However, landslide risk assessments often lack explicit references to Eco-DRR and unified frameworks, notably for its Landslide Susceptibility Assessment (LSA). Here, we assess how ecological factors are integrated into LSAs and the feasibility of measuring them, using open Earth Observation (EO) data. We conduct an exploratory review for identifying the factors used in LSAs and ecosystem assessments, determining their commonalities. Key findings indicate that standardization is more lacking in ecosystem assessments than in LSAs, with the former exhibiting a higher dispersion of factors—195 identified across 41 papers—compared to the latter, where only 46 factors were identified across 30 studies. LSAs and ecosystem assessments shared 19 common factors, with only two, the Normalized Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), being widely accepted criteria. Our study contributes to advancing Eco-DRR practices by proposing concrete measures to expand the ecological perspective in LSAs and fostering collaboration between DRR and conservation domains. Ultimately, it raises awareness of the pivotal role that healthy ecosystems play in mitigating disasters and addressing societal challenges.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Disaster Science\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000188/pdfft?md5=4cd8c40b7998bdb7c8e882539551c2ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2590061724000188-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Disaster Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061724000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
What ecological factors to integrate in landslide susceptibility mapping? An exploratory review of current trends in support of eco-DRR
Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction (Eco-DRR) reflects the important role that natural ecosystems play in reducing the likelihood, severity, and impact of environmental disasters such as landslides. However, landslide risk assessments often lack explicit references to Eco-DRR and unified frameworks, notably for its Landslide Susceptibility Assessment (LSA). Here, we assess how ecological factors are integrated into LSAs and the feasibility of measuring them, using open Earth Observation (EO) data. We conduct an exploratory review for identifying the factors used in LSAs and ecosystem assessments, determining their commonalities. Key findings indicate that standardization is more lacking in ecosystem assessments than in LSAs, with the former exhibiting a higher dispersion of factors—195 identified across 41 papers—compared to the latter, where only 46 factors were identified across 30 studies. LSAs and ecosystem assessments shared 19 common factors, with only two, the Normalized Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), being widely accepted criteria. Our study contributes to advancing Eco-DRR practices by proposing concrete measures to expand the ecological perspective in LSAs and fostering collaboration between DRR and conservation domains. Ultimately, it raises awareness of the pivotal role that healthy ecosystems play in mitigating disasters and addressing societal challenges.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery.
A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.