通过生命周期评估比较智利供暖系统对环境的影响

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Adrián-Enrique Ortiz-Rojas , Ismaela Magliotto-Quevedo , Leonardo Guerra , Carlos Gaete-Morales , Paula Guerra , Camila Mery-Araya
{"title":"通过生命周期评估比较智利供暖系统对环境的影响","authors":"Adrián-Enrique Ortiz-Rojas ,&nbsp;Ismaela Magliotto-Quevedo ,&nbsp;Leonardo Guerra ,&nbsp;Carlos Gaete-Morales ,&nbsp;Paula Guerra ,&nbsp;Camila Mery-Araya","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study conducts a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of heating technologies commonly used in Chile based on six environmental indicators: Climate Change (CC), Human Toxicity (HT), Formation of Particulate Matter (PM), Formation of Photochemical Oxidants (PO), Ozone Destruction (OD), and Water Depletion (WD). Due to the extensive length of the territory studied, it is demonstrated that the environmental impacts depend on the geographical location where the heating equipment is used. Stoves that use wet firewood presented the highest environmental impact in CC, PM, HT, and PO. Using dry firewood could reduce pollution by 14%–81%, compared to wet firewood. Replacing wood heating with natural gas, LPG, and kerosene stoves reduces the CC and HT indicators. On the other hand, switching to electric heating, such as split inverter heat pumps, could transfer these impacts to areas where electricity is generated using coal. When the pellet is a byproduct of the forestry industry and transportation distances are not very high, the pellet stove stands out for its lower CC. In Magallanes, electric heating appears environmentally attractive due to using natural gas for electricity generation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100192"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000308/pdfft?md5=bd094b47f61269b5fb3dffe1cb2634f3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000308-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the environmental impacts of heating systems in Chile by life cycle assessment\",\"authors\":\"Adrián-Enrique Ortiz-Rojas ,&nbsp;Ismaela Magliotto-Quevedo ,&nbsp;Leonardo Guerra ,&nbsp;Carlos Gaete-Morales ,&nbsp;Paula Guerra ,&nbsp;Camila Mery-Araya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present study conducts a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of heating technologies commonly used in Chile based on six environmental indicators: Climate Change (CC), Human Toxicity (HT), Formation of Particulate Matter (PM), Formation of Photochemical Oxidants (PO), Ozone Destruction (OD), and Water Depletion (WD). Due to the extensive length of the territory studied, it is demonstrated that the environmental impacts depend on the geographical location where the heating equipment is used. Stoves that use wet firewood presented the highest environmental impact in CC, PM, HT, and PO. Using dry firewood could reduce pollution by 14%–81%, compared to wet firewood. Replacing wood heating with natural gas, LPG, and kerosene stoves reduces the CC and HT indicators. On the other hand, switching to electric heating, such as split inverter heat pumps, could transfer these impacts to areas where electricity is generated using coal. When the pellet is a byproduct of the forestry industry and transportation distances are not very high, the pellet stove stands out for its lower CC. In Magallanes, electric heating appears environmentally attractive due to using natural gas for electricity generation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000308/pdfft?md5=bd094b47f61269b5fb3dffe1cb2634f3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000308-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究开展了一项生命周期评估 (LCA),根据六项环境指标评估智利常用供暖技术对环境的影响:气候变化 (CC)、人类毒性 (HT)、颗粒物质的形成 (PM)、光化学氧化剂的形成 (PO)、臭氧破坏 (OD) 和水消耗 (WD)。由于所研究的地域范围很广,这表明环境影响取决于使用加热设备的地理位置。使用湿木柴的炉子对 CC、PM、HT 和 PO 的环境影响最大。与湿木柴相比,使用干木柴可减少 14%-81% 的污染。用天然气、液化石油气和煤油炉代替木柴取暖可降低 CC 和 HT 指标。另一方面,改用电加热(如分体变频热泵)可将这些影响转移到使用煤炭发电的地区。当颗粒燃料是林业的副产品且运输距离不是很远时,颗粒燃料炉的 CC 较低。在马加兰内斯,由于使用天然气发电,电加热似乎对环境很有吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of the environmental impacts of heating systems in Chile by life cycle assessment

Comparison of the environmental impacts of heating systems in Chile by life cycle assessment

The present study conducts a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of heating technologies commonly used in Chile based on six environmental indicators: Climate Change (CC), Human Toxicity (HT), Formation of Particulate Matter (PM), Formation of Photochemical Oxidants (PO), Ozone Destruction (OD), and Water Depletion (WD). Due to the extensive length of the territory studied, it is demonstrated that the environmental impacts depend on the geographical location where the heating equipment is used. Stoves that use wet firewood presented the highest environmental impact in CC, PM, HT, and PO. Using dry firewood could reduce pollution by 14%–81%, compared to wet firewood. Replacing wood heating with natural gas, LPG, and kerosene stoves reduces the CC and HT indicators. On the other hand, switching to electric heating, such as split inverter heat pumps, could transfer these impacts to areas where electricity is generated using coal. When the pellet is a byproduct of the forestry industry and transportation distances are not very high, the pellet stove stands out for its lower CC. In Magallanes, electric heating appears environmentally attractive due to using natural gas for electricity generation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信