对因 COVID-19 而入住重症监护室的幸存者进行全面的身体功能评估。

Critical care science Pub Date : 2024-05-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20240284-en
Marcia Souza Volpe, Ana Carolina Cardoso Dos Santos, Sílvia Gaspar, Jade Lara de Melo, Gabriela Harada, Patrícia Rocha Alves Ferreira, Karina Ramiceli Soares da Silva, Natália Tiemi Simokomaki Souza, Carlos Toufen Junior, Luciana Dias Chiavegato, Marcelo Britto Passos Amato, Maria Ignez Zanetti Feltrim, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho
{"title":"对因 COVID-19 而入住重症监护室的幸存者进行全面的身体功能评估。","authors":"Marcia Souza Volpe, Ana Carolina Cardoso Dos Santos, Sílvia Gaspar, Jade Lara de Melo, Gabriela Harada, Patrícia Rocha Alves Ferreira, Karina Ramiceli Soares da Silva, Natália Tiemi Simokomaki Souza, Carlos Toufen Junior, Luciana Dias Chiavegato, Marcelo Britto Passos Amato, Maria Ignez Zanetti Feltrim, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240284-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the physical function and respiratory muscle strength of patients - who recovered from critical COVID-19 - after intensive care unit discharge to the ward on Days one (D1) and seven (D7), and to investigate variables associated with functional impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients with COVID-19 who needed invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula and were discharged from the intensive care unit to the ward. Participants were submitted to Medical Research Council sum-score, handgrip strength, maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, and short physical performance battery tests. Participants were grouped into two groups according to their need for invasive ventilation: the Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group (IMV Group) and the Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group (Non-IMV Group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the IMV Group (n = 31) were younger and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores than those in the Non-IMV Group (n = 33). The short physical performance battery scores (range 0 - 12) on D1 and D7 were 6.1 ± 4.3 and 7.3 ± 3.8, respectively for the Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group, and 1.3 ± 2.5 and 2.6 ± 3.7, respectively for the IMV Group. The prevalence of intensive care unit-acquired weakness on D7 was 13% for the Non-IMV Group and 72% for the IMV Group. The maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, and handgrip strength increased on D7 in both groups, but the maximal expiratory pressure and handgrip strength were still weak. Only maximal inspiratory pressure was recovered (i.e., > 80% of the predicted value) in the Non-IMV Group. Female sex, and the need and duration of invasive mechanical were independently and negatively associated with the short physical performance battery score and handgrip strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who recovered from critical COVID-19 and who received invasive mechanical ventilation presented greater disability than those who were not invasively ventilated. However, they both showed marginal functional improvement during early recovery, regardless of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. This might highlight the severity of disability caused by SARS-CoV-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"36 ","pages":"e20240284en"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive physical functional assessment of survivors of critical care unit stay due to COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Marcia Souza Volpe, Ana Carolina Cardoso Dos Santos, Sílvia Gaspar, Jade Lara de Melo, Gabriela Harada, Patrícia Rocha Alves Ferreira, Karina Ramiceli Soares da Silva, Natália Tiemi Simokomaki Souza, Carlos Toufen Junior, Luciana Dias Chiavegato, Marcelo Britto Passos Amato, Maria Ignez Zanetti Feltrim, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.62675/2965-2774.20240284-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the physical function and respiratory muscle strength of patients - who recovered from critical COVID-19 - after intensive care unit discharge to the ward on Days one (D1) and seven (D7), and to investigate variables associated with functional impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients with COVID-19 who needed invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula and were discharged from the intensive care unit to the ward. Participants were submitted to Medical Research Council sum-score, handgrip strength, maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, and short physical performance battery tests. Participants were grouped into two groups according to their need for invasive ventilation: the Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group (IMV Group) and the Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group (Non-IMV Group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the IMV Group (n = 31) were younger and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores than those in the Non-IMV Group (n = 33). The short physical performance battery scores (range 0 - 12) on D1 and D7 were 6.1 ± 4.3 and 7.3 ± 3.8, respectively for the Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group, and 1.3 ± 2.5 and 2.6 ± 3.7, respectively for the IMV Group. The prevalence of intensive care unit-acquired weakness on D7 was 13% for the Non-IMV Group and 72% for the IMV Group. The maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, and handgrip strength increased on D7 in both groups, but the maximal expiratory pressure and handgrip strength were still weak. Only maximal inspiratory pressure was recovered (i.e., > 80% of the predicted value) in the Non-IMV Group. Female sex, and the need and duration of invasive mechanical were independently and negatively associated with the short physical performance battery score and handgrip strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who recovered from critical COVID-19 and who received invasive mechanical ventilation presented greater disability than those who were not invasively ventilated. However, they both showed marginal functional improvement during early recovery, regardless of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. This might highlight the severity of disability caused by SARS-CoV-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care science\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"e20240284en\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098067/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240284-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240284-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究危重COVID-19患者在重症监护病房出院后第1天(D1)和第7天(D7)的身体功能和呼吸肌力量,并调查与功能障碍相关的变量:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为需要有创机械通气、无创通气或高流量鼻插管且从重症监护室出院到病房的 COVID-19 成年患者。参与者接受了医学研究委员会的总分、手握力、最大吸气压、最大呼气压和短期体能电池测试。根据有创通气的需要将参与者分为两组:有创机械通气组(IMV 组)和无创机械通气组(Non-IMV 组):有创机械通气组(n = 31)的患者比无创机械通气组(n = 33)的患者更年轻,器官功能衰竭序列评估得分更高。无创机械通气组 D1 和 D7 的短期体能电池得分(范围 0 - 12)分别为 6.1 ± 4.3 和 7.3 ± 3.8,而有创机械通气组分别为 1.3 ± 2.5 和 2.6 ± 3.7。在 D7 日,无创机械通气组的重症监护室获得性虚弱发生率为 13%,而有创机械通气组为 72%。两组患者的最大吸气压、最大呼气压和手握强度在第 7 天均有所增加,但最大呼气压和手握强度仍然较弱。只有非 IMV 组的最大吸气压得到恢复(即大于预测值的 80%)。女性性别、有创机械治疗的需求和持续时间与短期体能表现电池评分和握力呈独立负相关:结论:COVID-19危重症康复后接受有创机械通气的患者比未接受有创通气的患者的残疾程度更高。然而,无论是否需要进行有创机械通气,他们在早期恢复期间的功能都略有改善。这可能凸显了 SARS-CoV-2 导致残疾的严重性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comprehensive physical functional assessment of survivors of critical care unit stay due to COVID-19.

Objective: To examine the physical function and respiratory muscle strength of patients - who recovered from critical COVID-19 - after intensive care unit discharge to the ward on Days one (D1) and seven (D7), and to investigate variables associated with functional impairment.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients with COVID-19 who needed invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula and were discharged from the intensive care unit to the ward. Participants were submitted to Medical Research Council sum-score, handgrip strength, maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, and short physical performance battery tests. Participants were grouped into two groups according to their need for invasive ventilation: the Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group (IMV Group) and the Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group (Non-IMV Group).

Results: Patients in the IMV Group (n = 31) were younger and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores than those in the Non-IMV Group (n = 33). The short physical performance battery scores (range 0 - 12) on D1 and D7 were 6.1 ± 4.3 and 7.3 ± 3.8, respectively for the Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group, and 1.3 ± 2.5 and 2.6 ± 3.7, respectively for the IMV Group. The prevalence of intensive care unit-acquired weakness on D7 was 13% for the Non-IMV Group and 72% for the IMV Group. The maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, and handgrip strength increased on D7 in both groups, but the maximal expiratory pressure and handgrip strength were still weak. Only maximal inspiratory pressure was recovered (i.e., > 80% of the predicted value) in the Non-IMV Group. Female sex, and the need and duration of invasive mechanical were independently and negatively associated with the short physical performance battery score and handgrip strength.

Conclusion: Patients who recovered from critical COVID-19 and who received invasive mechanical ventilation presented greater disability than those who were not invasively ventilated. However, they both showed marginal functional improvement during early recovery, regardless of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. This might highlight the severity of disability caused by SARS-CoV-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信