新生儿败血症中 miRNA 的诊断能力:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yihong Zhao, Ruqin Zhu, Xiaoyan Hu
{"title":"新生儿败血症中 miRNA 的诊断能力:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yihong Zhao, Ruqin Zhu, Xiaoyan Hu","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2345850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal sepsis is the third leading cause of mortality during the neonatal period, with manifestations atypical and obscure. But the gold standard-blood culture test, requiring 3-5 days, makes it difficult to unveil the final pathogen and leads to the increasing ratio of false-negative results. The empirical method is consulting traditional biomarkers, such as procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cell count. However, they are not specific for neonate in diagnostic capacity, especially for infants within three days after delivery, so more novel biomarkers are urgently needed to assist diagnosing neonatal sepsis. microRNAs (miRNAs) have been widely studied in recent years for their diagnostic and prognostic values in different diseases and we conducted a meta-analysis of miRNAs on the topic that whether they are potentially novel biomarkers in early detection of neonatal sepsis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of the study was to assess whether circulating miRNAs could be used as potential biomarkers for neonatal sepsis, including early and late-onset neonatal sepsis, then calculate their overall accuracy (OA) via meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid databases were retrieved; data cutoff for this analysis was 15 January 2023. Methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed through the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated to present miRNAs' diagnostic value including the pooled sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive or negative likelihood ratios (PLR or NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC). Differences in OA between the septic group and non-septic group were compared using Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After identification, 16 records out of 11 selected articles were eligible for systematic review of miRNAs and four records for PCT; the case group for miRNAs included 945 neonatal sepsis cases; contrast group included 190 respiratory tract infections or pneumonia cases, 60 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) cases and 559 healthy neonates. The pooled Sen, Spe, and DOR of miRNAs were 0.87 (95%CI 0.81-0.91), 0.79 (95%CI 0.71-0.85), and 24 (95%CI 12-50), respectively. The pooled Sen, Spe, and DOR of PCT were 0.92 (95%CI 0.83-0.96), 0.64 (95%CI 0.56-0.70), and 20 (95%CI, 7-56), respectively. The OA value of miRNAs was 80.38% and that of PCT was 77.36%, which were not statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = .13) after the Chi-square test. In addition, no significant publication bias was indicated (<i>p</i> = .92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Circulating miRNA levels could be applied as diagnostic biomarkers in neonatal sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"2345850"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic capacity of miRNAs in neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yihong Zhao, Ruqin Zhu, Xiaoyan Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2024.2345850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal sepsis is the third leading cause of mortality during the neonatal period, with manifestations atypical and obscure. But the gold standard-blood culture test, requiring 3-5 days, makes it difficult to unveil the final pathogen and leads to the increasing ratio of false-negative results. The empirical method is consulting traditional biomarkers, such as procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cell count. However, they are not specific for neonate in diagnostic capacity, especially for infants within three days after delivery, so more novel biomarkers are urgently needed to assist diagnosing neonatal sepsis. microRNAs (miRNAs) have been widely studied in recent years for their diagnostic and prognostic values in different diseases and we conducted a meta-analysis of miRNAs on the topic that whether they are potentially novel biomarkers in early detection of neonatal sepsis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of the study was to assess whether circulating miRNAs could be used as potential biomarkers for neonatal sepsis, including early and late-onset neonatal sepsis, then calculate their overall accuracy (OA) via meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid databases were retrieved; data cutoff for this analysis was 15 January 2023. Methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed through the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated to present miRNAs' diagnostic value including the pooled sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive or negative likelihood ratios (PLR or NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC). Differences in OA between the septic group and non-septic group were compared using Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After identification, 16 records out of 11 selected articles were eligible for systematic review of miRNAs and four records for PCT; the case group for miRNAs included 945 neonatal sepsis cases; contrast group included 190 respiratory tract infections or pneumonia cases, 60 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) cases and 559 healthy neonates. The pooled Sen, Spe, and DOR of miRNAs were 0.87 (95%CI 0.81-0.91), 0.79 (95%CI 0.71-0.85), and 24 (95%CI 12-50), respectively. The pooled Sen, Spe, and DOR of PCT were 0.92 (95%CI 0.83-0.96), 0.64 (95%CI 0.56-0.70), and 20 (95%CI, 7-56), respectively. The OA value of miRNAs was 80.38% and that of PCT was 77.36%, which were not statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = .13) after the Chi-square test. In addition, no significant publication bias was indicated (<i>p</i> = .92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Circulating miRNA levels could be applied as diagnostic biomarkers in neonatal sepsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"2345850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2345850\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2345850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新生儿败血症是新生儿期的第三大死亡原因,表现不典型、不明显。但金标准--血液培养检测需要 3-5 天时间,难以揭示最终病原体,导致假阴性结果的比例越来越高。经验方法是咨询传统的生物标志物,如降钙素原(PCT)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞计数。近年来,microRNAs(miRNAs)因其在不同疾病中的诊断和预后价值而被广泛研究,我们就miRNAs是否是早期检测新生儿败血症的潜在新型生物标志物这一主题进行了荟萃分析:该研究的目的是评估循环miRNA是否可作为新生儿败血症(包括早期和晚期新生儿败血症)的潜在生物标志物,然后通过荟萃分析计算其总体准确性(OA):方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus和Ovid数据库,分析数据截止日期为2023年1月15日。通过预后研究质量工具对纳入研究进行了方法学质量评估。计算了相应的 95% 置信区间(95%CI),以显示 miRNAs 的诊断价值,包括集合灵敏度(Sen)、特异性(Spe)、阳性或阴性似然比(PLR 或 NLR)、诊断几率比(DOR)和曲线下面积(AUC)。脓毒症组和非脓毒症组的 OA 差异采用卡方检验进行比较:经鉴定,11 篇入选文章中有 16 条记录符合 miRNAs 系统综述条件,4 条记录符合 PCT 条件;miRNAs 病例组包括 945 例新生儿败血症病例;对比组包括 190 例呼吸道感染或肺炎病例、60 例全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)病例和 559 例健康新生儿。汇总的 miRNAs Sen、Spe 和 DOR 分别为 0.87(95%CI 0.81-0.91)、0.79(95%CI 0.71-0.85)和 24(95%CI 12-50)。PCT 的集合 Sen、Spe 和 DOR 分别为 0.92(95%CI 0.83-0.96)、0.64(95%CI 0.56-0.70)和 20(95%CI,7-56)。经卡方检验,miRNAs 的 OA 值为 80.38%,PCT 为 77.36%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.13)。结论:循环 miRNA 水平可用于临床研究:结论:循环 miRNA 水平可作为新生儿败血症的诊断生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic capacity of miRNAs in neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Neonatal sepsis is the third leading cause of mortality during the neonatal period, with manifestations atypical and obscure. But the gold standard-blood culture test, requiring 3-5 days, makes it difficult to unveil the final pathogen and leads to the increasing ratio of false-negative results. The empirical method is consulting traditional biomarkers, such as procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cell count. However, they are not specific for neonate in diagnostic capacity, especially for infants within three days after delivery, so more novel biomarkers are urgently needed to assist diagnosing neonatal sepsis. microRNAs (miRNAs) have been widely studied in recent years for their diagnostic and prognostic values in different diseases and we conducted a meta-analysis of miRNAs on the topic that whether they are potentially novel biomarkers in early detection of neonatal sepsis.

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to assess whether circulating miRNAs could be used as potential biomarkers for neonatal sepsis, including early and late-onset neonatal sepsis, then calculate their overall accuracy (OA) via meta-analysis.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid databases were retrieved; data cutoff for this analysis was 15 January 2023. Methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed through the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated to present miRNAs' diagnostic value including the pooled sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive or negative likelihood ratios (PLR or NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC). Differences in OA between the septic group and non-septic group were compared using Chi-square test.

Results: After identification, 16 records out of 11 selected articles were eligible for systematic review of miRNAs and four records for PCT; the case group for miRNAs included 945 neonatal sepsis cases; contrast group included 190 respiratory tract infections or pneumonia cases, 60 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) cases and 559 healthy neonates. The pooled Sen, Spe, and DOR of miRNAs were 0.87 (95%CI 0.81-0.91), 0.79 (95%CI 0.71-0.85), and 24 (95%CI 12-50), respectively. The pooled Sen, Spe, and DOR of PCT were 0.92 (95%CI 0.83-0.96), 0.64 (95%CI 0.56-0.70), and 20 (95%CI, 7-56), respectively. The OA value of miRNAs was 80.38% and that of PCT was 77.36%, which were not statistically significant difference (p = .13) after the Chi-square test. In addition, no significant publication bias was indicated (p = .92).

Conclusions: Circulating miRNA levels could be applied as diagnostic biomarkers in neonatal sepsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信