用于股骨转子间骨折(AO/OTA 31A3.3)固定的短、中、长股骨近端钉的生物力学比较。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-05-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21514593241253434
Jiro Ando, Tsuneari Takahashi, Tomohiro Matsumura, Katsushi Takeshita
{"title":"用于股骨转子间骨折(AO/OTA 31A3.3)固定的短、中、长股骨近端钉的生物力学比较。","authors":"Jiro Ando, Tsuneari Takahashi, Tomohiro Matsumura, Katsushi Takeshita","doi":"10.1177/21514593241253434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In surgeries for unstable AO/OTA 31A3.3 fractures, surgeons use various lengths of intramedullary nails (IMNs). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the appropriate nail length for these fractures. This study compared the biomechanical properties of IMNs of different lengths for AO/OTA 31A3.3 fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>30 synthetic femora of AO/OTA 31A3.3 fracture model were randomly assigned to the following three groups: short- (170 mm), mid- (235 mm), and long-length (300 mm) nail groups, and were performed fixation surgery. The translation patterns of the constructs were examined by cyclic testing and compared among three groups. Additionally, changes in the neck-shaft and shaft-nail angles after cyclic testing were evaluated using radiological images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translation patterns during cyclic loading did not differ among the groups. Conversely, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant difference in the neck-shaft angle change (5.8° ± 1.8°, 2.8° ± 1.3°, and 1.9° ± .9° in the short-, mid-, and long-length groups, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001), and post-hoc analysis revealed that the change was greater in the short-length group than in the mid- and long-length groups (<i>P</i> < .001 and <i>P</i> < .001, respectively). Furthermore, one-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the shaft-nail angle change (3.1° ± 2.1°, 1.4° ± 1.4°, and .1° ± .6° in the short-, mid-, and long-length groups, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001), and post-hoc analysis revealed that the change was greater in the short-length group than in the mid- and long-length groups (<i>P</i> = .044 and <i>P</i> < .001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-length nails were associated with relevant changes in the neck-shaft and shaft-nail angles in our AO/OTA 31A3.3 fracture model. Thus, the selection of mid- or long-length nails instead of short-length nails might be better in IMN surgery for these fractures to prevent postoperative varus deformity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"15 ","pages":"21514593241253434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical Comparison of Short-, Mid-, and Long-Length Proximal Femoral Nails for Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture (AO/OTA 31A3.3) Fixation.\",\"authors\":\"Jiro Ando, Tsuneari Takahashi, Tomohiro Matsumura, Katsushi Takeshita\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21514593241253434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In surgeries for unstable AO/OTA 31A3.3 fractures, surgeons use various lengths of intramedullary nails (IMNs). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the appropriate nail length for these fractures. This study compared the biomechanical properties of IMNs of different lengths for AO/OTA 31A3.3 fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>30 synthetic femora of AO/OTA 31A3.3 fracture model were randomly assigned to the following three groups: short- (170 mm), mid- (235 mm), and long-length (300 mm) nail groups, and were performed fixation surgery. The translation patterns of the constructs were examined by cyclic testing and compared among three groups. Additionally, changes in the neck-shaft and shaft-nail angles after cyclic testing were evaluated using radiological images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translation patterns during cyclic loading did not differ among the groups. Conversely, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant difference in the neck-shaft angle change (5.8° ± 1.8°, 2.8° ± 1.3°, and 1.9° ± .9° in the short-, mid-, and long-length groups, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001), and post-hoc analysis revealed that the change was greater in the short-length group than in the mid- and long-length groups (<i>P</i> < .001 and <i>P</i> < .001, respectively). Furthermore, one-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the shaft-nail angle change (3.1° ± 2.1°, 1.4° ± 1.4°, and .1° ± .6° in the short-, mid-, and long-length groups, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001), and post-hoc analysis revealed that the change was greater in the short-length group than in the mid- and long-length groups (<i>P</i> = .044 and <i>P</i> < .001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-length nails were associated with relevant changes in the neck-shaft and shaft-nail angles in our AO/OTA 31A3.3 fracture model. Thus, the selection of mid- or long-length nails instead of short-length nails might be better in IMN surgery for these fractures to prevent postoperative varus deformity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"21514593241253434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241253434\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241253434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在治疗不稳定 AO/OTA 31A3.3 骨折的手术中,外科医生会使用不同长度的髓内钉(IMN)。然而,目前还没有足够的证据表明这些骨折应该使用多长的髓内钉。方法:将 30 个 AO/OTA 31A3.3 骨折模型的合成股骨随机分配到以下三组:短钉组(170 毫米)、中钉组(235 毫米)和长钉组(300 毫米),并进行固定手术。通过循环测试检验了结构的平移模式,并在三组之间进行了比较。此外,还利用放射影像评估了循环测试后颈轴角度和轴-钉角度的变化:结果:各组在循环加载过程中的平移模式没有差异。相反,单因素方差分析(ANOVA)显示颈轴角度的变化存在显著差异(短、中、长长度组分别为 5.8° ± 1.8°、2.8° ± 1.3°和 1.9° ± .9°;P < .001),事后分析显示短长度组的变化大于中、长长度组(P < .001 和 P < .001)。此外,单因素方差分析显示,轴-甲角度变化存在显著差异(短、中、长指甲组分别为 3.1° ± 2.1°、1.4° ± 1.4°和 .1° ± .6°;P < .001),事后分析显示,短指甲组的变化大于中长指甲组和长指甲组(P = .044 和 P < .001):结论:在我们的 AO/OTA 31A3.3 骨折模型中,短钉与颈-轴和轴-钉角度的相关变化有关。结论:在我们的 AO/OTA 31A3.3 骨折模型中,短钉与颈-轴和轴-钉角度的相关变化有关。因此,在对此类骨折进行 IMN 手术时,选择中长钉或长钉而不是短钉可能会更好,以防止术后出现屈曲畸形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanical Comparison of Short-, Mid-, and Long-Length Proximal Femoral Nails for Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture (AO/OTA 31A3.3) Fixation.

Introduction: In surgeries for unstable AO/OTA 31A3.3 fractures, surgeons use various lengths of intramedullary nails (IMNs). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the appropriate nail length for these fractures. This study compared the biomechanical properties of IMNs of different lengths for AO/OTA 31A3.3 fractures.

Methods: 30 synthetic femora of AO/OTA 31A3.3 fracture model were randomly assigned to the following three groups: short- (170 mm), mid- (235 mm), and long-length (300 mm) nail groups, and were performed fixation surgery. The translation patterns of the constructs were examined by cyclic testing and compared among three groups. Additionally, changes in the neck-shaft and shaft-nail angles after cyclic testing were evaluated using radiological images.

Results: The translation patterns during cyclic loading did not differ among the groups. Conversely, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant difference in the neck-shaft angle change (5.8° ± 1.8°, 2.8° ± 1.3°, and 1.9° ± .9° in the short-, mid-, and long-length groups, respectively; P < .001), and post-hoc analysis revealed that the change was greater in the short-length group than in the mid- and long-length groups (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). Furthermore, one-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the shaft-nail angle change (3.1° ± 2.1°, 1.4° ± 1.4°, and .1° ± .6° in the short-, mid-, and long-length groups, respectively; P < .001), and post-hoc analysis revealed that the change was greater in the short-length group than in the mid- and long-length groups (P = .044 and P < .001, respectively).

Conclusions: Short-length nails were associated with relevant changes in the neck-shaft and shaft-nail angles in our AO/OTA 31A3.3 fracture model. Thus, the selection of mid- or long-length nails instead of short-length nails might be better in IMN surgery for these fractures to prevent postoperative varus deformity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信