开源大语言模型从自由文本放射学报告中提取信息的性能。

IF 8.1 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Bastien Le Guellec, Alexandre Lefèvre, Charlotte Geay, Lucas Shorten, Cyril Bruge, Lotfi Hacein-Bey, Philippe Amouyel, Jean-Pierre Pruvo, Gregory Kuchcinski, Aghiles Hamroun
{"title":"开源大语言模型从自由文本放射学报告中提取信息的性能。","authors":"Bastien Le Guellec, Alexandre Lefèvre, Charlotte Geay, Lucas Shorten, Cyril Bruge, Lotfi Hacein-Bey, Philippe Amouyel, Jean-Pierre Pruvo, Gregory Kuchcinski, Aghiles Hamroun","doi":"10.1148/ryai.230364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To assess the performance of a local open-source large language model (LLM) in various information extraction tasks from real-life emergency brain MRI reports. Materials and Methods All consecutive emergency brain MRI reports written in 2022 from a French quaternary center were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists identified MRI scans that were performed in the emergency department for headaches. Four radiologists scored the reports' conclusions as either normal or abnormal. Abnormalities were labeled as either headache-causing or incidental. Vicuna (LMSYS Org), an open-source LLM, performed the same tasks. Vicuna's performance metrics were evaluated using the radiologists' consensus as the reference standard. Results Among the 2398 reports during the study period, radiologists identified 595 that included headaches in the indication (median age of patients, 35 years [IQR, 26-51 years]; 68% [403 of 595] women). A positive finding was reported in 227 of 595 (38%) cases, 136 of which could explain the headache. The LLM had a sensitivity of 98.0% (95% CI: 96.5, 99.0) and specificity of 99.3% (95% CI: 98.8, 99.7) for detecting the presence of headache in the clinical context, a sensitivity of 99.4% (95% CI: 98.3, 99.9) and specificity of 98.6% (95% CI: 92.2, 100.0) for the use of contrast medium injection, a sensitivity of 96.0% (95% CI: 92.5, 98.2) and specificity of 98.9% (95% CI: 97.2, 99.7) for study categorization as either normal or abnormal, and a sensitivity of 88.2% (95% CI: 81.6, 93.1) and specificity of 73% (95% CI: 62, 81) for causal inference between MRI findings and headache. Conclusion An open-source LLM was able to extract information from free-text radiology reports with excellent accuracy without requiring further training. <b>Keywords:</b> Large Language Model (LLM), Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPT), Open Source, Information Extraction, Report, Brain, MRI <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. See also the commentary by Akinci D'Antonoli and Bluethgen in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e230364"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of an Open-Source Large Language Model in Extracting Information from Free-Text Radiology Reports.\",\"authors\":\"Bastien Le Guellec, Alexandre Lefèvre, Charlotte Geay, Lucas Shorten, Cyril Bruge, Lotfi Hacein-Bey, Philippe Amouyel, Jean-Pierre Pruvo, Gregory Kuchcinski, Aghiles Hamroun\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/ryai.230364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To assess the performance of a local open-source large language model (LLM) in various information extraction tasks from real-life emergency brain MRI reports. Materials and Methods All consecutive emergency brain MRI reports written in 2022 from a French quaternary center were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists identified MRI scans that were performed in the emergency department for headaches. Four radiologists scored the reports' conclusions as either normal or abnormal. Abnormalities were labeled as either headache-causing or incidental. Vicuna (LMSYS Org), an open-source LLM, performed the same tasks. Vicuna's performance metrics were evaluated using the radiologists' consensus as the reference standard. Results Among the 2398 reports during the study period, radiologists identified 595 that included headaches in the indication (median age of patients, 35 years [IQR, 26-51 years]; 68% [403 of 595] women). A positive finding was reported in 227 of 595 (38%) cases, 136 of which could explain the headache. The LLM had a sensitivity of 98.0% (95% CI: 96.5, 99.0) and specificity of 99.3% (95% CI: 98.8, 99.7) for detecting the presence of headache in the clinical context, a sensitivity of 99.4% (95% CI: 98.3, 99.9) and specificity of 98.6% (95% CI: 92.2, 100.0) for the use of contrast medium injection, a sensitivity of 96.0% (95% CI: 92.5, 98.2) and specificity of 98.9% (95% CI: 97.2, 99.7) for study categorization as either normal or abnormal, and a sensitivity of 88.2% (95% CI: 81.6, 93.1) and specificity of 73% (95% CI: 62, 81) for causal inference between MRI findings and headache. Conclusion An open-source LLM was able to extract information from free-text radiology reports with excellent accuracy without requiring further training. <b>Keywords:</b> Large Language Model (LLM), Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPT), Open Source, Information Extraction, Report, Brain, MRI <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. See also the commentary by Akinci D'Antonoli and Bluethgen in this issue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e230364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294959/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

"刚刚接受 "的论文经过同行评审,已被接受在《放射学》上发表:人工智能》上发表。这篇文章在以最终版本发表之前,还将经过校对、排版和校对审核。请注意,在制作最终校对稿的过程中,可能会发现影响内容的错误。目的 评估本地开源大语言模型(LLM)在实际急诊脑部核磁共振成像报告的各种信息提取任务中的表现。材料与方法 回顾性审查了法国一家四级中心 2022 年撰写的所有连续急诊脑部 MRI 报告。两名放射科医生确定了因头痛而进行的磁共振成像。四位放射科医生将报告结论分为正常或异常。异常被标记为导致头痛或偶发。开源 LLM Vicuna 也执行了同样的任务。以放射科医生的共识作为参考标准,对 Vicuna 的性能指标进行了评估。结果 在研究期间的 2398 份报告中,放射科医生发现有 595 份报告的适应症包括头痛(患者年龄中位数为 35 岁 [IQR,26-51],68%(403/595)为女性)。227/595(38%)例报告了阳性结果,其中 136 例可以解释头痛。在临床情况下,LLM 检测头痛存在的敏感性/特异性(95%CI)分别为 98% (583/595)(97-99)/99% (1791/1803)(99-100) ,注射造影剂的敏感性/特异性(95%CI)分别为 99% (514/517)(98-100)/99% (68/69)(92-100) 、97%(219/227)(93-99)/99%(364/368)(97-100)用于正常或异常研究分类,88%(120/136)(82-93)/73%(66/91)(62-81)用于 MRI 发现与头痛之间的因果推断。结论 开源 LLM 能够从自由文本放射学报告中提取信息,准确性极高,无需进一步培训。©RSNA,2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of an Open-Source Large Language Model in Extracting Information from Free-Text Radiology Reports.

Purpose To assess the performance of a local open-source large language model (LLM) in various information extraction tasks from real-life emergency brain MRI reports. Materials and Methods All consecutive emergency brain MRI reports written in 2022 from a French quaternary center were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists identified MRI scans that were performed in the emergency department for headaches. Four radiologists scored the reports' conclusions as either normal or abnormal. Abnormalities were labeled as either headache-causing or incidental. Vicuna (LMSYS Org), an open-source LLM, performed the same tasks. Vicuna's performance metrics were evaluated using the radiologists' consensus as the reference standard. Results Among the 2398 reports during the study period, radiologists identified 595 that included headaches in the indication (median age of patients, 35 years [IQR, 26-51 years]; 68% [403 of 595] women). A positive finding was reported in 227 of 595 (38%) cases, 136 of which could explain the headache. The LLM had a sensitivity of 98.0% (95% CI: 96.5, 99.0) and specificity of 99.3% (95% CI: 98.8, 99.7) for detecting the presence of headache in the clinical context, a sensitivity of 99.4% (95% CI: 98.3, 99.9) and specificity of 98.6% (95% CI: 92.2, 100.0) for the use of contrast medium injection, a sensitivity of 96.0% (95% CI: 92.5, 98.2) and specificity of 98.9% (95% CI: 97.2, 99.7) for study categorization as either normal or abnormal, and a sensitivity of 88.2% (95% CI: 81.6, 93.1) and specificity of 73% (95% CI: 62, 81) for causal inference between MRI findings and headache. Conclusion An open-source LLM was able to extract information from free-text radiology reports with excellent accuracy without requiring further training. Keywords: Large Language Model (LLM), Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPT), Open Source, Information Extraction, Report, Brain, MRI Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. See also the commentary by Akinci D'Antonoli and Bluethgen in this issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信