腹膜外与经腹膜根治性膀胱切除术的利弊。

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY

Urology Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.22037/uj.v20i.8140

Farzad Allameh, Amir Hossein Eslami

{"title":"腹膜外与经腹膜根治性膀胱切除术的利弊。","authors":"Farzad Allameh, Amir Hossein Eslami","doi":"10.22037/uj.v20i.8140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most common cancers of the urinary tract is bladder tumors. Bladder cancers are divided into two groups: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. (1) Trans-Peritoneal Radical Cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard technique in muscle invasive and high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (2). and Urologist around the world are more familiar with trans-peritoneal technique. In some articles extra-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy (RC) implied as an decreased postoperative complications techniques. In this letter we want to compare these two techniques and find out the pros and cons of these techniques.","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extra-peritoneal vs. Trans-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy pros and cons.\",\"authors\":\"Farzad Allameh, Amir Hossein Eslami\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/uj.v20i.8140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most common cancers of the urinary tract is bladder tumors. Bladder cancers are divided into two groups: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. (1) Trans-Peritoneal Radical Cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard technique in muscle invasive and high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (2). and Urologist around the world are more familiar with trans-peritoneal technique. In some articles extra-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy (RC) implied as an decreased postoperative complications techniques. In this letter we want to compare these two techniques and find out the pros and cons of these techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.8140\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.8140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

膀胱肿瘤是泌尿系统最常见的癌症之一。膀胱癌分为两类：非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌（NMIBC）和肌肉浸润性膀胱癌。(1）经腹膜根治性膀胱切除术（RC）加盆腔淋巴结切除术是治疗肌肉浸润性和高风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的标准技术（2）。在一些文章中，腹膜外根治性膀胱切除术（RC）被认为是一种可减少术后并发症的技术。在这封信中，我们希望对这两种技术进行比较，找出它们的优缺点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Extra-peritoneal vs. Trans-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy pros and cons.

One of the most common cancers of the urinary tract is bladder tumors. Bladder cancers are divided into two groups: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. (1) Trans-Peritoneal Radical Cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard technique in muscle invasive and high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (2). and Urologist around the world are more familiar with trans-peritoneal technique. In some articles extra-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy (RC) implied as an decreased postoperative complications techniques. In this letter we want to compare these two techniques and find out the pros and cons of these techniques.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

6.70%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.