体内角膜生物力学对三种不同激光角膜屈光手术的反应。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
ZhanXin Qu, XiaoMeng Li, YongYi Yuan, Pu Wang, Ying Li, SiYu Lin, HengLi Lian, ShiHao Chen, YuFeng Ye, JunJie Wang, JinFang Wu, Ahmed Elsheikh, FangJun Bao
{"title":"体内角膜生物力学对三种不同激光角膜屈光手术的反应。","authors":"ZhanXin Qu, XiaoMeng Li, YongYi Yuan, Pu Wang, Ying Li, SiYu Lin, HengLi Lian, ShiHao Chen, YuFeng Ye, JunJie Wang, JinFang Wu, Ahmed Elsheikh, FangJun Bao","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20240322-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effects of three common refractive surgeries on corneal biomechanics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred seven patients who had refractive surgery were included in this study, of whom 65 received transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), 73 received femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FSLASIK), and 69 received small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Each patient had biomechanical measurements using the Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The measurements included five parameters expected to be associated with corneal biomechanics: deformation amplitude ratio at 2 mm (DAR2), integrated inverse radius (IIR), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), highest concavity time (HCT), and the updated stress-strain index (SSIv2). The variations in these parameters postoperatively among the three surgeries, and their relationship with corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure measured by the Dynamic Contour Tonometer (DCT-IOP) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SP-A1 decreased significantly from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively in all three groups, whereas DAR2 and IIR increased significantly, all indicating stiffness losses. Between 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the results were inconsistent, with DAR2 decreasing (indicating stiffness increases) and IIR increasing (denoting stiffness decreases) in the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups. The decrease in SSIv2 (the only measure of corneal material stiffness) postoperatively was comparatively less pronounced at both 3 and 6 months postoperatively. On the other hand, HCT remained generally stable after all three surgeries. Unlike DAR2, IIR, and SP-A1, the changes postoperatively in stiffness parameters HCT and SSIv2 were independent of the corresponding changes in both DCT-IOP and CCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the stiffness parameters considered, SSIv2 was not correlated with CCT or DCT-IOP, and holds promise for representing the corneal material stiffness and how it remains largely unaffected by refractive surgeries. Overall, FS-LASIK had the most significant impact on corneal stiffness, followed by SMILE, and finally tPRK. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(5):e344-e352.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"40 5","pages":"e344-e352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Response to Three Different Laser Corneal Refractive Surgeries.\",\"authors\":\"ZhanXin Qu, XiaoMeng Li, YongYi Yuan, Pu Wang, Ying Li, SiYu Lin, HengLi Lian, ShiHao Chen, YuFeng Ye, JunJie Wang, JinFang Wu, Ahmed Elsheikh, FangJun Bao\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20240322-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effects of three common refractive surgeries on corneal biomechanics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred seven patients who had refractive surgery were included in this study, of whom 65 received transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), 73 received femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FSLASIK), and 69 received small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Each patient had biomechanical measurements using the Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The measurements included five parameters expected to be associated with corneal biomechanics: deformation amplitude ratio at 2 mm (DAR2), integrated inverse radius (IIR), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), highest concavity time (HCT), and the updated stress-strain index (SSIv2). The variations in these parameters postoperatively among the three surgeries, and their relationship with corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure measured by the Dynamic Contour Tonometer (DCT-IOP) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SP-A1 decreased significantly from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively in all three groups, whereas DAR2 and IIR increased significantly, all indicating stiffness losses. Between 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the results were inconsistent, with DAR2 decreasing (indicating stiffness increases) and IIR increasing (denoting stiffness decreases) in the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups. The decrease in SSIv2 (the only measure of corneal material stiffness) postoperatively was comparatively less pronounced at both 3 and 6 months postoperatively. On the other hand, HCT remained generally stable after all three surgeries. Unlike DAR2, IIR, and SP-A1, the changes postoperatively in stiffness parameters HCT and SSIv2 were independent of the corresponding changes in both DCT-IOP and CCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the stiffness parameters considered, SSIv2 was not correlated with CCT or DCT-IOP, and holds promise for representing the corneal material stiffness and how it remains largely unaffected by refractive surgeries. Overall, FS-LASIK had the most significant impact on corneal stiffness, followed by SMILE, and finally tPRK. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(5):e344-e352.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"e344-e352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20240322-01\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20240322-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较三种常见屈光手术对角膜生物力学的影响:本研究纳入了 277 名接受屈光手术的患者,其中 65 人接受了经上皮层光屈光性角膜切除术(tPRK),73 人接受了飞秒激光辅助激光原位角膜磨镶术(FSLASIK),69 人接受了小切口皮孔摘除术(SMILE)。每位患者在术前、术后 3 个月和 6 个月都使用 Corvis ST(Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH)进行了生物力学测量。测量结果包括预计与角膜生物力学相关的五个参数:2 毫米处的形变振幅比(DAR2)、综合反向半径(IIR)、首次角膜塑形时的硬度参数(SP-A1)、最高凹时间(HCT)和最新应力应变指数(SSIv2)。分析了三种手术术后这些参数的变化,以及它们与角膜厚度(CCT)和动态轮廓眼压计测量的眼压(DCT-IOP)之间的关系:结果:三组患者的 SP-A1 从术前到术后 3 个月都明显下降,而 DAR2 和 IIR 则明显上升,均表明硬度下降。术后3至6个月,结果不一致,FS-LASIK组和SMILE组的DAR2下降(表明硬度增加),IIR上升(表明硬度下降)。术后 3 个月和 6 个月,SSIv2(唯一衡量角膜材料硬度的指标)的下降幅度相对较小。另一方面,HCT 在三次手术后基本保持稳定。与DAR2、IIR和SP-A1不同,术后硬度参数HCT和SSIv2的变化与DCT-IOP和CCT的相应变化无关:结论:在考虑的硬度参数中,SSIv2 与 CCT 或 DCT-IOP 无关,有望代表角膜材料的硬度,以及它如何在很大程度上不受屈光手术的影响。总体而言,FS-LASIK 对角膜硬度的影响最大,其次是 SMILE,最后是 tPRK。[J Refract Surg. 2024;40(5):e344-e352]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Response to Three Different Laser Corneal Refractive Surgeries.

Purpose: To compare the effects of three common refractive surgeries on corneal biomechanics.

Methods: Two hundred seven patients who had refractive surgery were included in this study, of whom 65 received transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), 73 received femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FSLASIK), and 69 received small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Each patient had biomechanical measurements using the Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The measurements included five parameters expected to be associated with corneal biomechanics: deformation amplitude ratio at 2 mm (DAR2), integrated inverse radius (IIR), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), highest concavity time (HCT), and the updated stress-strain index (SSIv2). The variations in these parameters postoperatively among the three surgeries, and their relationship with corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure measured by the Dynamic Contour Tonometer (DCT-IOP) were analyzed.

Results: SP-A1 decreased significantly from preoperatively to 3 months postoperatively in all three groups, whereas DAR2 and IIR increased significantly, all indicating stiffness losses. Between 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the results were inconsistent, with DAR2 decreasing (indicating stiffness increases) and IIR increasing (denoting stiffness decreases) in the FS-LASIK and SMILE groups. The decrease in SSIv2 (the only measure of corneal material stiffness) postoperatively was comparatively less pronounced at both 3 and 6 months postoperatively. On the other hand, HCT remained generally stable after all three surgeries. Unlike DAR2, IIR, and SP-A1, the changes postoperatively in stiffness parameters HCT and SSIv2 were independent of the corresponding changes in both DCT-IOP and CCT.

Conclusions: Among the stiffness parameters considered, SSIv2 was not correlated with CCT or DCT-IOP, and holds promise for representing the corneal material stiffness and how it remains largely unaffected by refractive surgeries. Overall, FS-LASIK had the most significant impact on corneal stiffness, followed by SMILE, and finally tPRK. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(5):e344-e352.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信