12 个中高收入欧洲国家心肌梗死后冠状动脉再血管化和心血管死亡率的性别差异。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Edina Cenko, Jinsung Yoon, Maria Bergami, Chris P Gale, Zorana Vasiljevic, Marija Vavlukis, Sasko Kedev, Davor Miličić, Maria Dorobantu, Lina Badimon, Olivia Manfrini, Raffaele Bugiardini
{"title":"12 个中高收入欧洲国家心肌梗死后冠状动脉再血管化和心血管死亡率的性别差异。","authors":"Edina Cenko, Jinsung Yoon, Maria Bergami, Chris P Gale, Zorana Vasiljevic, Marija Vavlukis, Sasko Kedev, Davor Miličić, Maria Dorobantu, Lina Badimon, Olivia Manfrini, Raffaele Bugiardini","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing data on female sex and excess cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) mostly come from high-income countries (HICs). This study aimed to investigate how sex disparities in treatments and outcomes vary across countries with different income levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the ISACS Archives registry included 22 087 MI patients from 6 HICs and 6 middle-income countries (MICs). MI data were disaggregated by clinical presentation: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among STEMI patients, women in MICs had nearly double the 30-day mortality rate of men [12.4% vs. 5.8%; adjusted risk ratio (RR) 2.30, 95% CI 1.98-2.68]. This difference was less pronounced in HICs (6.8% vs. 5.1%; RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.75). Despite more frequent treatments and timely revascularization in MICs, sex-based mortality differences persisted even after revascularization (8.0% vs. 4.1%; RR 2.05, 95% CI, 1.68-2.50 in MICs and 5.6% vs. 2.6%; RR 2.17, 95% CI, 1.48-3.18) in HICs. Additionally, women from MICs had higher diabetes rates compared to HICs (31.8% vs. 25.1%, standardized difference = 0.15). NSTEMI outcomes were relatively similar between sexes and income groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sex disparities in mortality rates following STEMI are more pronounced in MICs compared to HICs. These disparities cannot be solely attributed to sex-related inequities in revascularization. Variations in mortality may also be influenced by sex differences in socioeconomic factors and baseline comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"719-729"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronary revascularization and sex differences in cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction in 12 high and middle-income European countries.\",\"authors\":\"Edina Cenko, Jinsung Yoon, Maria Bergami, Chris P Gale, Zorana Vasiljevic, Marija Vavlukis, Sasko Kedev, Davor Miličić, Maria Dorobantu, Lina Badimon, Olivia Manfrini, Raffaele Bugiardini\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing data on female sex and excess cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) mostly come from high-income countries (HICs). This study aimed to investigate how sex disparities in treatments and outcomes vary across countries with different income levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the ISACS Archives registry included 22 087 MI patients from 6 HICs and 6 middle-income countries (MICs). MI data were disaggregated by clinical presentation: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among STEMI patients, women in MICs had nearly double the 30-day mortality rate of men [12.4% vs. 5.8%; adjusted risk ratio (RR) 2.30, 95% CI 1.98-2.68]. This difference was less pronounced in HICs (6.8% vs. 5.1%; RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.75). Despite more frequent treatments and timely revascularization in MICs, sex-based mortality differences persisted even after revascularization (8.0% vs. 4.1%; RR 2.05, 95% CI, 1.68-2.50 in MICs and 5.6% vs. 2.6%; RR 2.17, 95% CI, 1.48-3.18) in HICs. Additionally, women from MICs had higher diabetes rates compared to HICs (31.8% vs. 25.1%, standardized difference = 0.15). NSTEMI outcomes were relatively similar between sexes and income groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sex disparities in mortality rates following STEMI are more pronounced in MICs compared to HICs. These disparities cannot be solely attributed to sex-related inequities in revascularization. Variations in mortality may also be influenced by sex differences in socioeconomic factors and baseline comorbidities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"719-729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445642/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae035\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有关心肌梗死(MI)后女性性别和心血管死亡率过高的现有数据大多来自高收入国家(HICs)。本研究旨在探讨不同收入水平的国家在治疗和结果方面的性别差异:方法:ISACS-Archives登记处的数据包括来自6个高收入国家和6个中等收入国家(MIC)的22 087名心肌梗死患者。心肌梗死数据按临床表现分类:ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)。主要结果是 30 天死亡率:在 STEMI 患者中,MICs 中女性的 30 天死亡率几乎是男性的两倍(12.4% 对 5.8%;调整风险比 [RR] 2.30,95% CI 1.98-2.68)。这一差异在高危人群中不太明显(6.8% 对 5.1%;RR 1.36,95% CI 1.05-1.75)。尽管中等收入国家的治疗更频繁、血管重建更及时,但即使在血管重建后,基于性别的死亡率差异依然存在(中等收入国家为 8.0% 对 4.1%;RR 2.05,95% CI,1.68-2.50;高收入国家为 5.6% 对 2.6%;RR 2.17,95% CI,1.48-3.18)。此外,与高收入国家相比,中等收入国家妇女的糖尿病发病率更高(31.8% 对 25.1%,标准化差异 = 0.15)。不同性别和收入群体的NSTEMI结果相对相似:结论:与高收入国家相比,中等收入国家在 STEMI 死亡率方面的性别差异更为明显。这些差异不能完全归因于血管重建中与性别相关的不平等。死亡率的差异还可能受到社会经济因素和基线合并症的性别差异的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Coronary revascularization and sex differences in cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction in 12 high and middle-income European countries.

Coronary revascularization and sex differences in cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction in 12 high and middle-income European countries.

Coronary revascularization and sex differences in cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction in 12 high and middle-income European countries.

Coronary revascularization and sex differences in cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction in 12 high and middle-income European countries.

Background: Existing data on female sex and excess cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) mostly come from high-income countries (HICs). This study aimed to investigate how sex disparities in treatments and outcomes vary across countries with different income levels.

Methods: Data from the ISACS Archives registry included 22 087 MI patients from 6 HICs and 6 middle-income countries (MICs). MI data were disaggregated by clinical presentation: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.

Results: Among STEMI patients, women in MICs had nearly double the 30-day mortality rate of men [12.4% vs. 5.8%; adjusted risk ratio (RR) 2.30, 95% CI 1.98-2.68]. This difference was less pronounced in HICs (6.8% vs. 5.1%; RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.75). Despite more frequent treatments and timely revascularization in MICs, sex-based mortality differences persisted even after revascularization (8.0% vs. 4.1%; RR 2.05, 95% CI, 1.68-2.50 in MICs and 5.6% vs. 2.6%; RR 2.17, 95% CI, 1.48-3.18) in HICs. Additionally, women from MICs had higher diabetes rates compared to HICs (31.8% vs. 25.1%, standardized difference = 0.15). NSTEMI outcomes were relatively similar between sexes and income groups.

Conclusions: Sex disparities in mortality rates following STEMI are more pronounced in MICs compared to HICs. These disparities cannot be solely attributed to sex-related inequities in revascularization. Variations in mortality may also be influenced by sex differences in socioeconomic factors and baseline comorbidities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信