大多数术前压力测试不符合实践指南的适应症,也不能减少心脏事件的发生。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1177/1358863X241247537
Aravind S Ponukumati, Jesse A Columbo, Stanislav Henkin, Jocelyn M Beach, Bjoern D Suckow, Philip P Goodney, Salvatore T Scali, David H Stone
{"title":"大多数术前压力测试不符合实践指南的适应症,也不能减少心脏事件的发生。","authors":"Aravind S Ponukumati, Jesse A Columbo, Stanislav Henkin, Jocelyn M Beach, Bjoern D Suckow, Philip P Goodney, Salvatore T Scali, David H Stone","doi":"10.1177/1358863X241247537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is wide variation in stress test utilization before major vascular surgery and adherence to practice guidelines is unclear. We defined rates of stress test compliance at our institution and led a quality improvement initiative to improve compliance with American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a stress testing order set in the electronic medical record at one tertiary hospital. We reviewed all patients who underwent elective, major vascular surgery in the 6 months before (Jan 1, 2022 - Jul 1, 2022) and 6 months after (Aug 1, 2022 - Jan 31, 2023) implementation. We studied stress test guideline compliance, changes in medical or surgical management, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before order set implementation, 37/122 patients (30%) underwent stress testing within the past year (29 specifically ordered preoperatively) with 66% (19/29) guideline compliance. After order set implementation, 50/173 patients (29%) underwent stress testing within the past year (41 specifically ordered preoperatively) with 80% (33/41) guideline compliance. In the pre- and postimplementation cohorts, stress testing led to a cardiovascular medication change or preoperative coronary revascularization in 24% (7/29) and 27% (11/41) of patients, and a staged surgery or less invasive anesthetic strategy in 14% (4/29) and 4.9% (2/41) of patients, respectively. All unindicated stress tests were surgeon-ordered and none led to a change in management. There was no change in MACE after order set implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Electronic medical record-based guidance of perioperative stress testing led to a slight decrease in overall stress testing and an increase in guideline-compliant testing. Our study highlights a need for improved preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment prior to major vascular surgery, which may eliminate unnecessary testing and more effectively guide perioperative decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Most preoperative stress tests fail to comply with practice guideline indications and do not reduce cardiac events.\",\"authors\":\"Aravind S Ponukumati, Jesse A Columbo, Stanislav Henkin, Jocelyn M Beach, Bjoern D Suckow, Philip P Goodney, Salvatore T Scali, David H Stone\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1358863X241247537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is wide variation in stress test utilization before major vascular surgery and adherence to practice guidelines is unclear. We defined rates of stress test compliance at our institution and led a quality improvement initiative to improve compliance with American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a stress testing order set in the electronic medical record at one tertiary hospital. We reviewed all patients who underwent elective, major vascular surgery in the 6 months before (Jan 1, 2022 - Jul 1, 2022) and 6 months after (Aug 1, 2022 - Jan 31, 2023) implementation. We studied stress test guideline compliance, changes in medical or surgical management, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before order set implementation, 37/122 patients (30%) underwent stress testing within the past year (29 specifically ordered preoperatively) with 66% (19/29) guideline compliance. After order set implementation, 50/173 patients (29%) underwent stress testing within the past year (41 specifically ordered preoperatively) with 80% (33/41) guideline compliance. In the pre- and postimplementation cohorts, stress testing led to a cardiovascular medication change or preoperative coronary revascularization in 24% (7/29) and 27% (11/41) of patients, and a staged surgery or less invasive anesthetic strategy in 14% (4/29) and 4.9% (2/41) of patients, respectively. All unindicated stress tests were surgeon-ordered and none led to a change in management. There was no change in MACE after order set implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Electronic medical record-based guidance of perioperative stress testing led to a slight decrease in overall stress testing and an increase in guideline-compliant testing. Our study highlights a need for improved preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment prior to major vascular surgery, which may eliminate unnecessary testing and more effectively guide perioperative decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X241247537\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X241247537","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大血管手术前的压力测试使用情况差异很大,对实践指南的遵守情况也不明确。我们确定了本院的压力测试依从率,并领导了一项质量改进计划,以提高对美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)指南的依从性:方法:我们在一家三级医院的电子病历中实施了压力测试订单集。我们回顾了实施前 6 个月(2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 1 日)和实施后 6 个月(2022 年 8 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 31 日)接受择期大血管手术的所有患者。我们对压力测试指南的合规性、内科或外科手术管理的变化以及重大心脏不良事件(MACE)进行了研究:在订单集实施前,37/122 名患者(30%)在过去一年内接受了压力测试(29 名患者在术前特别要求接受压力测试),指南合规率为 66%(19/29)。实施医嘱集后,50/173 名患者(29%)在过去一年内接受了压力测试(41 名患者在术前特别要求接受压力测试),指南符合率为 80%(33/41)。在实施前和实施后的队列中,分别有 24% (7/29)和 27% (11/41)的患者因压力测试而更换心血管药物或进行术前冠状动脉血运重建,分别有 14% (4/29)和 4.9% (2/41)的患者因压力测试而采取分期手术或微创麻醉策略。所有无指征的压力测试都是由外科医生下达的,没有一项导致治疗方案的改变。结论:以电子病历为基础的围手术期指导是一项非常重要的工作:结论:基于电子病历的围手术期压力测试指导使整体压力测试略有减少,符合指导原则的测试有所增加。我们的研究强调了在大血管手术前改进术前心血管风险评估的必要性,这样可以避免不必要的检查并更有效地指导围手术期决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Most preoperative stress tests fail to comply with practice guideline indications and do not reduce cardiac events.

Background: There is wide variation in stress test utilization before major vascular surgery and adherence to practice guidelines is unclear. We defined rates of stress test compliance at our institution and led a quality improvement initiative to improve compliance with American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines.

Methods: We implemented a stress testing order set in the electronic medical record at one tertiary hospital. We reviewed all patients who underwent elective, major vascular surgery in the 6 months before (Jan 1, 2022 - Jul 1, 2022) and 6 months after (Aug 1, 2022 - Jan 31, 2023) implementation. We studied stress test guideline compliance, changes in medical or surgical management, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Results: Before order set implementation, 37/122 patients (30%) underwent stress testing within the past year (29 specifically ordered preoperatively) with 66% (19/29) guideline compliance. After order set implementation, 50/173 patients (29%) underwent stress testing within the past year (41 specifically ordered preoperatively) with 80% (33/41) guideline compliance. In the pre- and postimplementation cohorts, stress testing led to a cardiovascular medication change or preoperative coronary revascularization in 24% (7/29) and 27% (11/41) of patients, and a staged surgery or less invasive anesthetic strategy in 14% (4/29) and 4.9% (2/41) of patients, respectively. All unindicated stress tests were surgeon-ordered and none led to a change in management. There was no change in MACE after order set implementation.

Conclusions: Electronic medical record-based guidance of perioperative stress testing led to a slight decrease in overall stress testing and an increase in guideline-compliant testing. Our study highlights a need for improved preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment prior to major vascular surgery, which may eliminate unnecessary testing and more effectively guide perioperative decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular Medicine
Vascular Medicine 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The premier, ISI-ranked journal of vascular medicine. Integrates the latest research in vascular biology with advancements for the practice of vascular medicine and vascular surgery. It features original research and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for vascular disease. A member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信