[手背深度烧伤急性期护理中腹股沟瓣、科尔森瓣和麦格雷戈瓣的位置:里尔烧伤中心的 6 例系列病例]。

Annals of burns and fire disasters Pub Date : 2024-03-31 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01
L Barry, E Guerre, M Jeanne, L Pasquesoone
{"title":"[手背深度烧伤急性期护理中腹股沟瓣、科尔森瓣和麦格雷戈瓣的位置:里尔烧伤中心的 6 例系列病例]。","authors":"L Barry, E Guerre, M Jeanne, L Pasquesoone","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The acute management of deep burns to the dorsum of the hand and fingers represents a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. The exposure of osteo-tendinous structures often requires flap coverage, in a context where loco-regional or free flaps are not always feasible. The aims of reconstruction are to preserve a maximum of digital length, provide supple tissue, obtain protective sensitivity, and achieve a functional hand at 1 year. We report here on a series of 8 deep burns to the dorsum of the hand. Six hands were covered by Colson abdominal flap-graft and two by pedicled inguinal flap. Four out of 6 patients were reviewed in consultation, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 1 patient died. Clinical evaluation was performed by a surgeon other than the operator. Functional results are highly variable. Coverage time varies according to lesion depth and patient severity. Flap weaning took place at an average of 30 days. DASH scores ranged from 17.5 to 93/100, with average to poor total active motion (TAM) scores. The aesthetic result was satisfactory, with a Vancouver score of 4.5/13 on average, and an overall patient opinion of 3.75/10 on the POSAS scale. For deep burns to the dorsum of the hand and fingers, local flaps are rarely possible, and loco-regional flaps are not feasible in cases of associated upper limb damage. For medium to large surface areas, pedicled inguinal flaps and pocketing are two reliable techniques. Nevertheless, they require relative immobilization of the upper limb, which leads to stiffness. The question of digital pinning in the intrinsic or straight position remains unresolved, and does not appear to prevent secondary deformities. There is also a learning curve for these two flaps, even though they are reputed to be easy to lift. McGregor's flap or pocketing can be weighed against free flaps. However, the operating time is long, the surgical technique is complex, and vascular damage is common in the burn patient population. Although there have been enormous technical advances since their descriptions, the pedicled inguinal flap and pocketing remain alternatives to be considered in the acute management of deep burns to the dorsum of the hand. In this presentation, we propose a surgical management algorithm to situate these two techniques in the plastic surgeon's therapeutic armament.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"37 1","pages":"64-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Place of Groin, Colson and McGregor Flaps in the Acute Care of Deep Burns to the Hand Dorsum : A Series of 6 Cases In Lille's Burn Centre].\",\"authors\":\"L Barry, E Guerre, M Jeanne, L Pasquesoone\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The acute management of deep burns to the dorsum of the hand and fingers represents a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. The exposure of osteo-tendinous structures often requires flap coverage, in a context where loco-regional or free flaps are not always feasible. The aims of reconstruction are to preserve a maximum of digital length, provide supple tissue, obtain protective sensitivity, and achieve a functional hand at 1 year. We report here on a series of 8 deep burns to the dorsum of the hand. Six hands were covered by Colson abdominal flap-graft and two by pedicled inguinal flap. Four out of 6 patients were reviewed in consultation, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 1 patient died. Clinical evaluation was performed by a surgeon other than the operator. Functional results are highly variable. Coverage time varies according to lesion depth and patient severity. Flap weaning took place at an average of 30 days. DASH scores ranged from 17.5 to 93/100, with average to poor total active motion (TAM) scores. The aesthetic result was satisfactory, with a Vancouver score of 4.5/13 on average, and an overall patient opinion of 3.75/10 on the POSAS scale. For deep burns to the dorsum of the hand and fingers, local flaps are rarely possible, and loco-regional flaps are not feasible in cases of associated upper limb damage. For medium to large surface areas, pedicled inguinal flaps and pocketing are two reliable techniques. Nevertheless, they require relative immobilization of the upper limb, which leads to stiffness. The question of digital pinning in the intrinsic or straight position remains unresolved, and does not appear to prevent secondary deformities. There is also a learning curve for these two flaps, even though they are reputed to be easy to lift. McGregor's flap or pocketing can be weighed against free flaps. However, the operating time is long, the surgical technique is complex, and vascular damage is common in the burn patient population. Although there have been enormous technical advances since their descriptions, the pedicled inguinal flap and pocketing remain alternatives to be considered in the acute management of deep burns to the dorsum of the hand. In this presentation, we propose a surgical management algorithm to situate these two techniques in the plastic surgeon's therapeutic armament.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"64-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手背和手指深度烧伤的急性处理对整形外科医生来说是一项挑战。在局部区域或游离皮瓣并不总是可行的情况下,暴露的骨肌腱结构往往需要皮瓣覆盖。重建的目的是最大限度地保留数字长度,提供柔软的组织,获得保护性灵敏度,并在 1 年后恢复手部功能。我们在此报告了一系列 8 例手背深度烧伤的病例。其中 6 只手采用科尔森腹部皮瓣移植,2 只手采用腹股沟带蒂皮瓣。6 名患者中有 4 名接受了会诊,1 名患者失去了随访机会,1 名患者死亡。临床评估由操作者以外的外科医生进行。功能结果差异很大。覆盖时间因病变深度和患者严重程度而异。皮瓣断裂平均需要 30 天。DASH评分从17.5分到93/100分不等,总活动度(TAM)评分从一般到较差不等。美学效果令人满意,温哥华评分平均为 4.5/13,POSAS评分中患者的总体评价为 3.75/10。对于手背和手指的深度烧伤,很少可能采用局部皮瓣,如果伴有上肢损伤,局部区域皮瓣也不可行。对于中等面积到大面积的烧伤,腹股沟带蒂皮瓣和袋状皮瓣是两种可靠的技术。不过,这两种方法都要求上肢相对固定,从而导致上肢僵硬。在固有位置或平直位置进行数字钉合的问题仍未解决,而且似乎无法防止继发性畸形。尽管这两种皮瓣被认为很容易掀起,但也有一个学习曲线。麦格雷戈皮瓣或袋形皮瓣可与游离皮瓣进行权衡。但是,手术时间长,手术技术复杂,而且烧伤患者中血管损伤很常见。尽管自这两种方法问世以来,技术上已经取得了巨大进步,但在手背深度烧伤的急性期治疗中,带蒂腹股沟皮瓣和袋状皮瓣仍是值得考虑的替代方法。在本讲座中,我们提出了一种手术管理算法,以便将这两种技术纳入整形外科医生的治疗手段中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The Place of Groin, Colson and McGregor Flaps in the Acute Care of Deep Burns to the Hand Dorsum : A Series of 6 Cases In Lille's Burn Centre].

The acute management of deep burns to the dorsum of the hand and fingers represents a challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. The exposure of osteo-tendinous structures often requires flap coverage, in a context where loco-regional or free flaps are not always feasible. The aims of reconstruction are to preserve a maximum of digital length, provide supple tissue, obtain protective sensitivity, and achieve a functional hand at 1 year. We report here on a series of 8 deep burns to the dorsum of the hand. Six hands were covered by Colson abdominal flap-graft and two by pedicled inguinal flap. Four out of 6 patients were reviewed in consultation, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 1 patient died. Clinical evaluation was performed by a surgeon other than the operator. Functional results are highly variable. Coverage time varies according to lesion depth and patient severity. Flap weaning took place at an average of 30 days. DASH scores ranged from 17.5 to 93/100, with average to poor total active motion (TAM) scores. The aesthetic result was satisfactory, with a Vancouver score of 4.5/13 on average, and an overall patient opinion of 3.75/10 on the POSAS scale. For deep burns to the dorsum of the hand and fingers, local flaps are rarely possible, and loco-regional flaps are not feasible in cases of associated upper limb damage. For medium to large surface areas, pedicled inguinal flaps and pocketing are two reliable techniques. Nevertheless, they require relative immobilization of the upper limb, which leads to stiffness. The question of digital pinning in the intrinsic or straight position remains unresolved, and does not appear to prevent secondary deformities. There is also a learning curve for these two flaps, even though they are reputed to be easy to lift. McGregor's flap or pocketing can be weighed against free flaps. However, the operating time is long, the surgical technique is complex, and vascular damage is common in the burn patient population. Although there have been enormous technical advances since their descriptions, the pedicled inguinal flap and pocketing remain alternatives to be considered in the acute management of deep burns to the dorsum of the hand. In this presentation, we propose a surgical management algorithm to situate these two techniques in the plastic surgeon's therapeutic armament.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信