用抗精神病药物治疗重症谵妄后的长期疗效(MIND-USA):一项随机、安慰剂对照的第三阶段试验。

IF 38.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Lancet Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00077-8
Matthew F Mart, Leanne M Boehm, Amy L Kiehl, Michelle N Gong, Atul Malhotra, Robert L Owens, Babar A Khan, Margaret A Pisani, Gregory A Schmidt, R Duncan Hite, Matthew C Exline, Shannon S Carson, Catherine L Hough, Peter Rock, Ivor S Douglas, Daniel J Feinstein, Robert C Hyzy, William D Schweickert, David L Bowton, Andrew Masica, Onur M Orun, Rameela Raman, Brenda T Pun, Cayce Strength, Mark L Rolfsen, Pratik P Pandharipande, Nathan E Brummel, Christopher G Hughes, Mayur B Patel, Joanna L Stollings, E Wesley Ely, James C Jackson, Timothy D Girard
{"title":"用抗精神病药物治疗重症谵妄后的长期疗效(MIND-USA):一项随机、安慰剂对照的第三阶段试验。","authors":"Matthew F Mart, Leanne M Boehm, Amy L Kiehl, Michelle N Gong, Atul Malhotra, Robert L Owens, Babar A Khan, Margaret A Pisani, Gregory A Schmidt, R Duncan Hite, Matthew C Exline, Shannon S Carson, Catherine L Hough, Peter Rock, Ivor S Douglas, Daniel J Feinstein, Robert C Hyzy, William D Schweickert, David L Bowton, Andrew Masica, Onur M Orun, Rameela Raman, Brenda T Pun, Cayce Strength, Mark L Rolfsen, Pratik P Pandharipande, Nathan E Brummel, Christopher G Hughes, Mayur B Patel, Joanna L Stollings, E Wesley Ely, James C Jackson, Timothy D Girard","doi":"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00077-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is common during critical illness and is associated with long-term cognitive impairment and disability. Antipsychotics are frequently used to treat delirium, but their effects on long-term outcomes are unknown. We aimed to investigate the effects of antipsychotic treatment of delirious, critically ill patients on long-term cognitive, functional, psychological, and quality-of-life outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prespecified, long-term follow-up to the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 MIND-USA Study was conducted in 16 hospitals throughout the USA. Adults (aged ≥18 years) who had been admitted to an intensive care unit with respiratory failure or septic or cardiogenic shock were eligible for inclusion in the study if they had delirium. Participants were randomly assigned-using a computer-generated, permuted-block randomisation scheme with stratification by trial site and age-in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive intravenous placebo, haloperidol, or ziprasidone for up to 14 days. Investigators and participants were masked to treatment group assignment. 3 months and 12 months after randomisation, we assessed survivors' cognitive, functional, psychological, quality-of-life, and employment outcomes using validated telephone-administered tests and questionnaires. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01211522, and is complete.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Dec 7, 2011, and Aug 12, 2017, we screened 20 914 individuals, of whom 566 were eligible and consented or had consent provided to participate. Of these 566 patients, 184 were assigned to the placebo group, 192 to the haloperidol group, and 190 to the ziprasidone group. 1-year survival and follow-up rates were similar between groups. Cognitive impairment was common in all three treatment groups, with a third of survivors impaired at both 3-month and 12-month follow-up in all groups. More than half of the surveyed survivors in each group had cognitive or physical limitations (or both) that precluded employment at both 3-month and 12-month follow-up. At both 3 months and 12 months, neither haloperidol (adjusted odds ratio 1·22 [95% CI 0·73-2.04] at 3 months and 1·12 [0·60-2·11] at 12 months) nor ziprasidone (1·07 [0·59-1·96] at 3 months and 0·94 [0·62-1·44] at 12 months) significantly altered cognitive outcomes, as measured by the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status T score, compared with placebo. We also found no evidence that functional, psychological, quality-of-life, or employment outcomes improved with haloperidol or ziprasidone compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In delirious, critically ill patients, neither haloperidol nor ziprasidone had a significant effect on cognitive, functional, psychological, or quality-of-life outcomes among survivors. Our findings, along with insufficient evidence of short-term benefit and frequent inappropriate continuation of antipsychotics at hospital discharge, indicate that antipsychotics should not be used routinely to treat delirium in critically ill adults.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institutes of Health and the US Department of Veterans Affairs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":38.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes after treatment of delirium during critical illness with antipsychotics (MIND-USA): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew F Mart, Leanne M Boehm, Amy L Kiehl, Michelle N Gong, Atul Malhotra, Robert L Owens, Babar A Khan, Margaret A Pisani, Gregory A Schmidt, R Duncan Hite, Matthew C Exline, Shannon S Carson, Catherine L Hough, Peter Rock, Ivor S Douglas, Daniel J Feinstein, Robert C Hyzy, William D Schweickert, David L Bowton, Andrew Masica, Onur M Orun, Rameela Raman, Brenda T Pun, Cayce Strength, Mark L Rolfsen, Pratik P Pandharipande, Nathan E Brummel, Christopher G Hughes, Mayur B Patel, Joanna L Stollings, E Wesley Ely, James C Jackson, Timothy D Girard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00077-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is common during critical illness and is associated with long-term cognitive impairment and disability. Antipsychotics are frequently used to treat delirium, but their effects on long-term outcomes are unknown. We aimed to investigate the effects of antipsychotic treatment of delirious, critically ill patients on long-term cognitive, functional, psychological, and quality-of-life outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prespecified, long-term follow-up to the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 MIND-USA Study was conducted in 16 hospitals throughout the USA. Adults (aged ≥18 years) who had been admitted to an intensive care unit with respiratory failure or septic or cardiogenic shock were eligible for inclusion in the study if they had delirium. Participants were randomly assigned-using a computer-generated, permuted-block randomisation scheme with stratification by trial site and age-in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive intravenous placebo, haloperidol, or ziprasidone for up to 14 days. Investigators and participants were masked to treatment group assignment. 3 months and 12 months after randomisation, we assessed survivors' cognitive, functional, psychological, quality-of-life, and employment outcomes using validated telephone-administered tests and questionnaires. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01211522, and is complete.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Dec 7, 2011, and Aug 12, 2017, we screened 20 914 individuals, of whom 566 were eligible and consented or had consent provided to participate. Of these 566 patients, 184 were assigned to the placebo group, 192 to the haloperidol group, and 190 to the ziprasidone group. 1-year survival and follow-up rates were similar between groups. Cognitive impairment was common in all three treatment groups, with a third of survivors impaired at both 3-month and 12-month follow-up in all groups. More than half of the surveyed survivors in each group had cognitive or physical limitations (or both) that precluded employment at both 3-month and 12-month follow-up. At both 3 months and 12 months, neither haloperidol (adjusted odds ratio 1·22 [95% CI 0·73-2.04] at 3 months and 1·12 [0·60-2·11] at 12 months) nor ziprasidone (1·07 [0·59-1·96] at 3 months and 0·94 [0·62-1·44] at 12 months) significantly altered cognitive outcomes, as measured by the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status T score, compared with placebo. We also found no evidence that functional, psychological, quality-of-life, or employment outcomes improved with haloperidol or ziprasidone compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In delirious, critically ill patients, neither haloperidol nor ziprasidone had a significant effect on cognitive, functional, psychological, or quality-of-life outcomes among survivors. Our findings, along with insufficient evidence of short-term benefit and frequent inappropriate continuation of antipsychotics at hospital discharge, indicate that antipsychotics should not be used routinely to treat delirium in critically ill adults.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institutes of Health and the US Department of Veterans Affairs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":38.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296889/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00077-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00077-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:谵妄是危重病人的常见病,与长期认知障碍和残疾有关。抗精神病药物常用于治疗谵妄,但其对长期结果的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在研究抗精神病药物治疗谵妄危重症患者对长期认知、功能、心理和生活质量的影响:该研究是对随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的第三阶段 MIND-USA 研究的预设长期随访,在全美 16 家医院进行。因呼吸衰竭、脓毒症或心源性休克而入住重症监护病房的成人(年龄≥18岁),如果出现谵妄,均可纳入研究。通过计算机生成的、按试验地点和年龄分层的包块随机方案,参与者按1:1:1的比例被随机分配到接受安慰剂、氟哌啶醇或齐拉西酮静脉注射,最长14天。研究人员和参试者对治疗组的分配都是蒙面的。随机分配后 3 个月和 12 个月,我们使用经过验证的电话测试和问卷对幸存者的认知、功能、心理、生活质量和就业结果进行了评估。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 登记,编号为 NCT01211522,目前已完成:从 2011 年 12 月 7 日到 2017 年 8 月 12 日,我们筛选了 20 914 人,其中 566 人符合条件并同意或获得同意参与。在这566名患者中,184人被分配到安慰剂组,192人被分配到氟哌啶醇组,190人被分配到齐拉西酮组。各组的 1 年生存率和随访率相似。认知障碍在所有三个治疗组中都很常见,所有治疗组中都有三分之一的幸存者在 3 个月和 12 个月的随访中出现认知障碍。在 3 个月和 12 个月的随访中,每组都有一半以上的受访幸存者在认知或身体方面受到限制(或两者兼有)而无法就业。在 3 个月和 12 个月的随访中,与安慰剂相比,氟哌啶醇(3 个月时调整后的几率为 1-22 [95% CI 0-73-2.04],12 个月时调整后的几率为 1-12 [0-60-2-11])和齐拉西酮(3 个月时调整后的几率为 1-07 [0-59-1-96],12 个月时调整后的几率为 0-94 [0-62-1-44])均未显著改变认知结果(以认知状况电话访谈 T 评分衡量)。我们还发现,与安慰剂相比,没有证据表明氟哌啶醇或齐拉西酮能改善功能、心理、生活质量或就业结果:在神志不清的重症患者中,氟哌啶醇和齐拉西酮对幸存者的认知、功能、心理或生活质量均无明显影响。我们的研究结果以及短期获益证据不足和出院时经常不适当地继续使用抗精神病药物的情况表明,不应常规使用抗精神病药物治疗成人重症患者的谵妄:美国国立卫生研究院和美国退伍军人事务部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term outcomes after treatment of delirium during critical illness with antipsychotics (MIND-USA): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Background: Delirium is common during critical illness and is associated with long-term cognitive impairment and disability. Antipsychotics are frequently used to treat delirium, but their effects on long-term outcomes are unknown. We aimed to investigate the effects of antipsychotic treatment of delirious, critically ill patients on long-term cognitive, functional, psychological, and quality-of-life outcomes.

Methods: This prespecified, long-term follow-up to the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 MIND-USA Study was conducted in 16 hospitals throughout the USA. Adults (aged ≥18 years) who had been admitted to an intensive care unit with respiratory failure or septic or cardiogenic shock were eligible for inclusion in the study if they had delirium. Participants were randomly assigned-using a computer-generated, permuted-block randomisation scheme with stratification by trial site and age-in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive intravenous placebo, haloperidol, or ziprasidone for up to 14 days. Investigators and participants were masked to treatment group assignment. 3 months and 12 months after randomisation, we assessed survivors' cognitive, functional, psychological, quality-of-life, and employment outcomes using validated telephone-administered tests and questionnaires. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01211522, and is complete.

Findings: Between Dec 7, 2011, and Aug 12, 2017, we screened 20 914 individuals, of whom 566 were eligible and consented or had consent provided to participate. Of these 566 patients, 184 were assigned to the placebo group, 192 to the haloperidol group, and 190 to the ziprasidone group. 1-year survival and follow-up rates were similar between groups. Cognitive impairment was common in all three treatment groups, with a third of survivors impaired at both 3-month and 12-month follow-up in all groups. More than half of the surveyed survivors in each group had cognitive or physical limitations (or both) that precluded employment at both 3-month and 12-month follow-up. At both 3 months and 12 months, neither haloperidol (adjusted odds ratio 1·22 [95% CI 0·73-2.04] at 3 months and 1·12 [0·60-2·11] at 12 months) nor ziprasidone (1·07 [0·59-1·96] at 3 months and 0·94 [0·62-1·44] at 12 months) significantly altered cognitive outcomes, as measured by the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status T score, compared with placebo. We also found no evidence that functional, psychological, quality-of-life, or employment outcomes improved with haloperidol or ziprasidone compared with placebo.

Interpretation: In delirious, critically ill patients, neither haloperidol nor ziprasidone had a significant effect on cognitive, functional, psychological, or quality-of-life outcomes among survivors. Our findings, along with insufficient evidence of short-term benefit and frequent inappropriate continuation of antipsychotics at hospital discharge, indicate that antipsychotics should not be used routinely to treat delirium in critically ill adults.

Funding: National Institutes of Health and the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Lancet Respiratory Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
87.10
自引率
0.70%
发文量
572
期刊介绍: The Lancet Respiratory Medicine is a renowned journal specializing in respiratory medicine and critical care. Our publication features original research that aims to advocate for change or shed light on clinical practices in the field. Additionally, we provide informative reviews on various topics related to respiratory medicine and critical care, ensuring a comprehensive coverage of the subject. The journal covers a wide range of topics including but not limited to asthma, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tobacco control, intensive care medicine, lung cancer, cystic fibrosis, pneumonia, sarcoidosis, sepsis, mesothelioma, sleep medicine, thoracic and reconstructive surgery, tuberculosis, palliative medicine, influenza, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary vascular disease, and respiratory infections. By encompassing such a broad spectrum of subjects, we strive to address the diverse needs and interests of our readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信