[三种职业健康风险评估方法在汽车制造业中的应用与比较]。

Q3 Medicine
Q Zeng, T Liu, X X Guo, C Han, J Liu, H Tao
{"title":"[三种职业健康风险评估方法在汽车制造业中的应用与比较]。","authors":"Q Zeng, T Liu, X X Guo, C Han, J Liu, H Tao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20230216-00043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Three occupational health risk assessment methods were used to assess the occupational health risk of noise exposed posts in an automobile manufacturing enterprise. According to the results, the selection of risk assessment methods and risk management of such occupational noise enterprises were provided. <b>Methods:</b> Form April to November 2021, The occupational health field survey was carried out in an automobile manufacturing industry in Tianjin. The occupational health MES risk assessment method, occupational health risk index risk assessment method and Australian occupational hazard risk assessment method were used to evaluate the occupational health risk of noise-exposed posts in this enterprise, and the evaluation results of different methods were analyzed and compared. <b>Results:</b> The average value of <i>L</i>(Aeq, 8 h) in the four workshops of automobile manufacturing industry was 82.95 dB (A) , and the noise detection exceeding rate was 22.41% (26/116) . The LAeq, 8h and exceeding rate noise of welding workshop were higher than those of other workshops (χ(2)=23.56, 32.94, <i>P</i><0.01) . The three occupational health risk assessment methods have the same risk assessment results for the four major workshops. The assembly and painting workshops are level 4 risk (possible risk) , and the stamping and welding workshops are level 3 risk (significant risk) . <b>Conclusion:</b> Occupational noise has certain potential hazards to workers in automobile manufacturing enterprises. Therefore, in the future work, corresponding organizational management measures should be taken to improve the working environment and reduce the actual exposure level of workers in order to protect the health of occupational workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23958,"journal":{"name":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","volume":"42 4","pages":"271-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Application and comparison of three occupational health risk assessment methods in an automobile manufacturing industry].\",\"authors\":\"Q Zeng, T Liu, X X Guo, C Han, J Liu, H Tao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20230216-00043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Three occupational health risk assessment methods were used to assess the occupational health risk of noise exposed posts in an automobile manufacturing enterprise. According to the results, the selection of risk assessment methods and risk management of such occupational noise enterprises were provided. <b>Methods:</b> Form April to November 2021, The occupational health field survey was carried out in an automobile manufacturing industry in Tianjin. The occupational health MES risk assessment method, occupational health risk index risk assessment method and Australian occupational hazard risk assessment method were used to evaluate the occupational health risk of noise-exposed posts in this enterprise, and the evaluation results of different methods were analyzed and compared. <b>Results:</b> The average value of <i>L</i>(Aeq, 8 h) in the four workshops of automobile manufacturing industry was 82.95 dB (A) , and the noise detection exceeding rate was 22.41% (26/116) . The LAeq, 8h and exceeding rate noise of welding workshop were higher than those of other workshops (χ(2)=23.56, 32.94, <i>P</i><0.01) . The three occupational health risk assessment methods have the same risk assessment results for the four major workshops. The assembly and painting workshops are level 4 risk (possible risk) , and the stamping and welding workshops are level 3 risk (significant risk) . <b>Conclusion:</b> Occupational noise has certain potential hazards to workers in automobile manufacturing enterprises. Therefore, in the future work, corresponding organizational management measures should be taken to improve the working environment and reduce the actual exposure level of workers in order to protect the health of occupational workers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志\",\"volume\":\"42 4\",\"pages\":\"271-276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20230216-00043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20230216-00043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用三种职业健康风险评估方法对某汽车制造企业中接触噪声岗位的职业健康风险进行评估。根据结果,为此类职业噪声企业的风险评估方法选择和风险管理提供参考。方法:2021 年 4 月至 11 月,在天津某汽车制造行业开展了职业健康现场调查。采用职业健康 MES 风险评价法、职业健康风险指数风险评价法和澳大利亚职业危害风险评价法对该企业接触噪声岗位的职业健康风险进行评价,并对不同方法的评价结果进行分析比较。结果表明汽车制造业 4 个车间的 L(Aeq,8 h)平均值为 82.95 dB(A),噪声检出超标率为 22.41%(26/116)。焊装车间的 8 小时 LAeq 值和超标率均高于其他车间(χ(2)=23.56、32.94、PC):职业噪声对汽车制造企业工人有一定的潜在危害。因此,在今后的工作中,应采取相应的组织管理措施,改善工作环境,降低工人的实际暴露水平,以保护职业工人的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Application and comparison of three occupational health risk assessment methods in an automobile manufacturing industry].

Objective: Three occupational health risk assessment methods were used to assess the occupational health risk of noise exposed posts in an automobile manufacturing enterprise. According to the results, the selection of risk assessment methods and risk management of such occupational noise enterprises were provided. Methods: Form April to November 2021, The occupational health field survey was carried out in an automobile manufacturing industry in Tianjin. The occupational health MES risk assessment method, occupational health risk index risk assessment method and Australian occupational hazard risk assessment method were used to evaluate the occupational health risk of noise-exposed posts in this enterprise, and the evaluation results of different methods were analyzed and compared. Results: The average value of L(Aeq, 8 h) in the four workshops of automobile manufacturing industry was 82.95 dB (A) , and the noise detection exceeding rate was 22.41% (26/116) . The LAeq, 8h and exceeding rate noise of welding workshop were higher than those of other workshops (χ(2)=23.56, 32.94, P<0.01) . The three occupational health risk assessment methods have the same risk assessment results for the four major workshops. The assembly and painting workshops are level 4 risk (possible risk) , and the stamping and welding workshops are level 3 risk (significant risk) . Conclusion: Occupational noise has certain potential hazards to workers in automobile manufacturing enterprises. Therefore, in the future work, corresponding organizational management measures should be taken to improve the working environment and reduce the actual exposure level of workers in order to protect the health of occupational workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9764
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信