{"title":"重复经颅磁刺激治疗注意力缺陷/多动症的随机假对照试验荟萃分析。","authors":"Chia-Min Chen, Shun-Chin Liang, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Yu-Shian Cheng, Kuo-Chuan Hung","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized sham-controlled trials were identified in major databases from January 1990 to January 2023. The primary outcome was overall improvement in ADHD symptoms. Subgroup analysis focused on the efficacy of rTMS in different brain regions. Secondary outcomes were the association of rTMS with improvement in different ADHD symptoms. Outcomes were expressed as effect size based on standardized mean difference (SMD)(continuous data), and ORs with 95%CI (categorical data).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A meta-analysis of six randomized sham-controlled trials involving 169 participants demonstrated no difference in overall ADHD symptoms between those treated with rTMS and sham controls (SMD = -0.24, p = 0.17). Subgroup analysis revealed that rTMS was more efficacious than sham treatment when targeting the right prefrontal cortex (SMD = -0.49, p = 0.03) but not the left prefrontal cortex (SMD = 0.01, p = 0.67). rTMS treatment was correlated with greater improvement in inattention (SMD = -0.76, p = 0.0002), but not hyperactivity (p = 0.86), impulsivity (p = 0.41), or depression symptoms (p = 0.95). The apparently higher risk of dropout in the rTMS group than the sham control group was not statistically significant (OR = 1.65, p = 0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review found that rTMS only had therapeutic efficacy for ADHD symptoms (particularly inattention) when targeting the right prefrontal cortex. Further large-scale randomized sham-controlled trials are required to verify our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20233428"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Min Chen, Shun-Chin Liang, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Yu-Shian Cheng, Kuo-Chuan Hung\",\"doi\":\"10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized sham-controlled trials were identified in major databases from January 1990 to January 2023. The primary outcome was overall improvement in ADHD symptoms. Subgroup analysis focused on the efficacy of rTMS in different brain regions. Secondary outcomes were the association of rTMS with improvement in different ADHD symptoms. Outcomes were expressed as effect size based on standardized mean difference (SMD)(continuous data), and ORs with 95%CI (categorical data).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A meta-analysis of six randomized sham-controlled trials involving 169 participants demonstrated no difference in overall ADHD symptoms between those treated with rTMS and sham controls (SMD = -0.24, p = 0.17). Subgroup analysis revealed that rTMS was more efficacious than sham treatment when targeting the right prefrontal cortex (SMD = -0.49, p = 0.03) but not the left prefrontal cortex (SMD = 0.01, p = 0.67). rTMS treatment was correlated with greater improvement in inattention (SMD = -0.76, p = 0.0002), but not hyperactivity (p = 0.86), impulsivity (p = 0.41), or depression symptoms (p = 0.95). The apparently higher risk of dropout in the rTMS group than the sham control group was not statistically significant (OR = 1.65, p = 0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review found that rTMS only had therapeutic efficacy for ADHD symptoms (particularly inattention) when targeting the right prefrontal cortex. Further large-scale randomized sham-controlled trials are required to verify our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e20233428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559844/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3428\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的研究重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对注意力缺陷/多动症(ADHD)的疗效:从1990年1月至2023年1月的主要数据库中筛选出随机假对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是ADHD总症状的改善情况。分组分析侧重于针对不同脑区的经颅磁刺激疗效。次要结果是经颅磁刺激与ADHD不同症状改善之间的关联。结果以基于标准化均值差异(SMD)的效应大小(ES)(连续数据)和带有95%置信区间(CI)的几率比(ORs)(分类数据)表示:对涉及 169 名参与者的六项 RCT 进行的 Meta 分析表明,经颅磁刺激治疗的参与者与假对照组之间在总的 ADHD 症状方面没有差异(SMD=-0.24,p=0.17)。亚组分析显示,经颅磁刺激针对右侧前额叶皮层(rPFC)的疗效优于假对照组(SMD=-0.49,p=0.03),但针对左侧前额叶皮层(lPFC)的疗效不佳(SMD= 0.经颅磁刺激治疗与注意力不集中(SMD=-0.76,p=0.0002)症状的改善相关,但与多动(p=0.86)、冲动(p=0.41)和抑郁(p=0.95)症状的改善无关。)经颅磁刺激组的辍学风险明显高于假对照组,但没有统计学意义(OR=1.65,p=0.26):我们的研究仅支持以rPFC为靶点的经颅磁刺激对多动症症状(尤其是注意力不集中)的疗效,但不支持以lPFC为靶点的经颅磁刺激的疗效。要验证我们的研究结果,还需要进一步开展大规模随机假对照试验。
A meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Methods: Randomized sham-controlled trials were identified in major databases from January 1990 to January 2023. The primary outcome was overall improvement in ADHD symptoms. Subgroup analysis focused on the efficacy of rTMS in different brain regions. Secondary outcomes were the association of rTMS with improvement in different ADHD symptoms. Outcomes were expressed as effect size based on standardized mean difference (SMD)(continuous data), and ORs with 95%CI (categorical data).
Results: A meta-analysis of six randomized sham-controlled trials involving 169 participants demonstrated no difference in overall ADHD symptoms between those treated with rTMS and sham controls (SMD = -0.24, p = 0.17). Subgroup analysis revealed that rTMS was more efficacious than sham treatment when targeting the right prefrontal cortex (SMD = -0.49, p = 0.03) but not the left prefrontal cortex (SMD = 0.01, p = 0.67). rTMS treatment was correlated with greater improvement in inattention (SMD = -0.76, p = 0.0002), but not hyperactivity (p = 0.86), impulsivity (p = 0.41), or depression symptoms (p = 0.95). The apparently higher risk of dropout in the rTMS group than the sham control group was not statistically significant (OR = 1.65, p = 0.26).
Conclusion: This review found that rTMS only had therapeutic efficacy for ADHD symptoms (particularly inattention) when targeting the right prefrontal cortex. Further large-scale randomized sham-controlled trials are required to verify our findings.
期刊介绍:
The Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (RBP) is the official organ of the Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP - Brazilian Association of Psychiatry).
The Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry is a bimonthly publication that aims to publish original manuscripts in all areas of psychiatry, including public health, clinical epidemiology, basic science, and mental health problems. The journal is fully open access, and there are no article processing or publication fees. Articles must be written in English.