[在客户小组中讨论调查结果似乎是一种对客户顾问有益的方法]。

Q4 Medicine
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2024-01-01
M Riemersma, C Maagd, N de Rooy, N M Lommerse, I Visch, H Kronemeijer, E de Beurs
{"title":"[在客户小组中讨论调查结果似乎是一种对客户顾问有益的方法]。","authors":"M Riemersma, C Maagd, N de Rooy, N M Lommerse, I Visch, H Kronemeijer, E de Beurs","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Client Participation Act in Healthcare Institutions prescribes that information must be collected as low as possible in the organization. To meet this need, Arkin&rsquo;s client council started experimenting with a new way to get in touch with clients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We regularly send a short survey to clients about a number of themes and we invite clients to discuss these in a client panel. Two rounds of surveys and panel discussions have now been organized on the following themes: waiting times, participation in treatment, stigma, ROM, eHealth and relative or friend.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experiences with the chosen approach were favorable. The collection of quantitative survey data and qualitative information from the panel discussion complemented each other and led to further professionalization of the work of the client council. Clients were happy to be involved in the work of the client council in this way. A better insight was gained into how they experience policy decisions and the client council was better able to present this information to the board of directors and the executive board of Arkin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new approach has strengthened the position of the client council within Arkin. We consider this a good approach to implement the Client Participation Act.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"66 4","pages":"188-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Discussing survey results in client panels appears a beneficial approach for a client counsel].\",\"authors\":\"M Riemersma, C Maagd, N de Rooy, N M Lommerse, I Visch, H Kronemeijer, E de Beurs\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Client Participation Act in Healthcare Institutions prescribes that information must be collected as low as possible in the organization. To meet this need, Arkin&rsquo;s client council started experimenting with a new way to get in touch with clients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We regularly send a short survey to clients about a number of themes and we invite clients to discuss these in a client panel. Two rounds of surveys and panel discussions have now been organized on the following themes: waiting times, participation in treatment, stigma, ROM, eHealth and relative or friend.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experiences with the chosen approach were favorable. The collection of quantitative survey data and qualitative information from the panel discussion complemented each other and led to further professionalization of the work of the client council. Clients were happy to be involved in the work of the client council in this way. A better insight was gained into how they experience policy decisions and the client council was better able to present this information to the board of directors and the executive board of Arkin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new approach has strengthened the position of the client council within Arkin. We consider this a good approach to implement the Client Participation Act.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie\",\"volume\":\"66 4\",\"pages\":\"188-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗机构客户参与法》规定,必须尽可能低地在机构内收集信息。为了满足这一需求,阿肯客户委员会开始尝试一种与客户接触的新方式:方法:我们定期就一些主题向客户发送简短的调查问卷,并邀请客户在客户小组中讨论这些主题。目前已就以下主题组织了两轮调查和小组讨论:等待时间、参与治疗、污名化、ROM、电子健康和亲友:结果:对所选方法的体验是好的。收集到的定量调查数据和小组讨论的定性信息相辅相成,使客户委员会的工作进一步专业化。客户很高兴以这种方式参与客户委员会的工作。客户委员会更深入地了解了他们是如何体验政策决定的,并能更好地将这些信息提交给阿肯董事会和执行委员会:新方法加强了客户委员会在阿肯内部的地位。我们认为这是实施《客户参与法》的好方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Discussing survey results in client panels appears a beneficial approach for a client counsel].

Background: The Client Participation Act in Healthcare Institutions prescribes that information must be collected as low as possible in the organization. To meet this need, Arkin’s client council started experimenting with a new way to get in touch with clients.

Method: We regularly send a short survey to clients about a number of themes and we invite clients to discuss these in a client panel. Two rounds of surveys and panel discussions have now been organized on the following themes: waiting times, participation in treatment, stigma, ROM, eHealth and relative or friend.

Results: The experiences with the chosen approach were favorable. The collection of quantitative survey data and qualitative information from the panel discussion complemented each other and led to further professionalization of the work of the client council. Clients were happy to be involved in the work of the client council in this way. A better insight was gained into how they experience policy decisions and the client council was better able to present this information to the board of directors and the executive board of Arkin.

Conclusion: The new approach has strengthened the position of the client council within Arkin. We consider this a good approach to implement the Client Participation Act.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信