荷兰慢性脊髓损伤相关疼痛非药物治疗的使用情况和效果:横断面调查。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2024.2345448
Tim C Crul, Aline J Hakbijl-van der Wind, Charlotte M van Laake-Geelen, Johanna Ma Visser-Meily, Marcel Wm Post, Janneke M Stolwijk-Swüste
{"title":"荷兰慢性脊髓损伤相关疼痛非药物治疗的使用情况和效果:横断面调查。","authors":"Tim C Crul, Aline J Hakbijl-van der Wind, Charlotte M van Laake-Geelen, Johanna Ma Visser-Meily, Marcel Wm Post, Janneke M Stolwijk-Swüste","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2345448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>Chronic pain is a common secondary condition in spinal cord injury (SCI). Pharmacological interventions to reduce pain are associated with side effects. The reported effects of non-pharmacological treatments are unclear. This study aims to examine the self-reported presence and type of pain, and the use, effectiveness and side effects of non-pharmacological treatments for pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey regarding SCI-related pain and non-pharmacological treatments.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community, the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Outpatients with SCI from two rehabilitation centers.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Self-reported presence and type of pain, use, effectiveness and side effects of non-pharmacological treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 371 patients (41.5%) returned the questionnaire. Median time since onset of SCI was 7 years. Pain following SCI was reported by 262 patients (70.6%). Neuropathic pain was reported most often (74.4%), followed by musculoskeletal pain (51.5%). Of patients with pain, 204 (77.9%) reported past or current use of non-pharmacological treatments. Non-pharmacological treatments used most were physiotherapy (67.6%), physical exercise (44.7%) and massage (22.5%). Of patients using non-pharmacological treatments, 152 patients (74.5%) reported the effect of their treatment. Most treatments for which the effect was reported, were described as moderately effective. Most side effects were reported for cannabis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with SCI experiencing pain often use non-pharmacological treatments. Most treatments were described as moderately effective. Research on specific non-pharmacological treatments and different types of pain separately is needed to further determine the effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"199-207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use and experienced effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments for chronic spinal cord injury related pain in The Netherlands: A cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Tim C Crul, Aline J Hakbijl-van der Wind, Charlotte M van Laake-Geelen, Johanna Ma Visser-Meily, Marcel Wm Post, Janneke M Stolwijk-Swüste\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2345448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>Chronic pain is a common secondary condition in spinal cord injury (SCI). Pharmacological interventions to reduce pain are associated with side effects. The reported effects of non-pharmacological treatments are unclear. This study aims to examine the self-reported presence and type of pain, and the use, effectiveness and side effects of non-pharmacological treatments for pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey regarding SCI-related pain and non-pharmacological treatments.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community, the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Outpatients with SCI from two rehabilitation centers.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Self-reported presence and type of pain, use, effectiveness and side effects of non-pharmacological treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 371 patients (41.5%) returned the questionnaire. Median time since onset of SCI was 7 years. Pain following SCI was reported by 262 patients (70.6%). Neuropathic pain was reported most often (74.4%), followed by musculoskeletal pain (51.5%). Of patients with pain, 204 (77.9%) reported past or current use of non-pharmacological treatments. Non-pharmacological treatments used most were physiotherapy (67.6%), physical exercise (44.7%) and massage (22.5%). Of patients using non-pharmacological treatments, 152 patients (74.5%) reported the effect of their treatment. Most treatments for which the effect was reported, were described as moderately effective. Most side effects were reported for cannabis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with SCI experiencing pain often use non-pharmacological treatments. Most treatments were described as moderately effective. Research on specific non-pharmacological treatments and different types of pain separately is needed to further determine the effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"199-207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864019/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2345448\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2345448","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:慢性疼痛是脊髓损伤(SCI)常见的继发性症状。减轻疼痛的药物干预与副作用有关。非药物治疗的效果尚不明确。本研究旨在调查自我报告的疼痛存在情况和类型,以及非药物治疗疼痛的使用情况、效果和副作用:设计:关于 SCI 相关疼痛和非药物治疗的横断面调查:环境:荷兰社区:干预措施:不适用:干预措施:不适用:干预措施:不适用。结果测量:自我报告疼痛的存在和类型,非药物治疗的使用、效果和副作用:共有 371 名患者(41.5%)返回了调查问卷。自 SCI 发病以来的中位时间为 7 年。262 名患者(70.6%)报告了 SCI 后的疼痛。最常见的是神经性疼痛(74.4%),其次是肌肉骨骼疼痛(51.5%)。在疼痛患者中,有 204 人(77.9%)报告过去或现在使用过非药物治疗。使用最多的非药物治疗方法是物理治疗(67.6%)、体育锻炼(44.7%)和按摩(22.5%)。在使用非药物治疗的患者中,152 名患者(74.5%)报告了治疗效果。大多数有效果报告的治疗方法被描述为中等效果。大多数副作用是针对大麻的:结论:感到疼痛的 SCI 患者经常使用非药物疗法。大多数治疗方法被描述为中等有效。需要对特定的非药物疗法和不同类型的疼痛分别进行研究,以进一步确定非药物疗法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use and experienced effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments for chronic spinal cord injury related pain in The Netherlands: A cross-sectional survey.

Context/objective: Chronic pain is a common secondary condition in spinal cord injury (SCI). Pharmacological interventions to reduce pain are associated with side effects. The reported effects of non-pharmacological treatments are unclear. This study aims to examine the self-reported presence and type of pain, and the use, effectiveness and side effects of non-pharmacological treatments for pain.

Design: Cross-sectional survey regarding SCI-related pain and non-pharmacological treatments.

Setting: Community, the Netherlands.

Participants: Outpatients with SCI from two rehabilitation centers.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Outcome measures: Self-reported presence and type of pain, use, effectiveness and side effects of non-pharmacological treatments.

Results: A total of 371 patients (41.5%) returned the questionnaire. Median time since onset of SCI was 7 years. Pain following SCI was reported by 262 patients (70.6%). Neuropathic pain was reported most often (74.4%), followed by musculoskeletal pain (51.5%). Of patients with pain, 204 (77.9%) reported past or current use of non-pharmacological treatments. Non-pharmacological treatments used most were physiotherapy (67.6%), physical exercise (44.7%) and massage (22.5%). Of patients using non-pharmacological treatments, 152 patients (74.5%) reported the effect of their treatment. Most treatments for which the effect was reported, were described as moderately effective. Most side effects were reported for cannabis.

Conclusion: Patients with SCI experiencing pain often use non-pharmacological treatments. Most treatments were described as moderately effective. Research on specific non-pharmacological treatments and different types of pain separately is needed to further determine the effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信