鄱阳湖叮咬蠓和蜱虫的物种级微生物群系

Jian Gong, Fei Fei Wang, Yang Qing Liu, Ji Pu, Ling Zhi Dong, Si Hui Zhang, Zhen Zhou Huang, Yu Yuan Huang, Ya Ben Li, Cai Xin Yang, Yuan Meihui Tao, Li Jun Zhao, Dong Jin, Li Yun Liu, Jing Yang, Shan Lu
{"title":"鄱阳湖叮咬蠓和蜱虫的物种级微生物群系","authors":"Jian Gong, Fei Fei Wang, Yang Qing Liu, Ji Pu, Ling Zhi Dong, Si Hui Zhang, Zhen Zhou Huang, Yu Yuan Huang, Ya Ben Li, Cai Xin Yang, Yuan Meihui Tao, Li Jun Zhao, Dong Jin, Li Yun Liu, Jing Yang, Shan Lu","doi":"10.3967/bes2024.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the bacterial communities of biting midges and ticks collected from three sites in the Poyang Lake area, namely, Qunlu Practice Base, Peach Blossom Garden, and Huangtong Animal Husbandry, and whether vectors carry any bacterial pathogens that may cause diseases to humans, to provide scientific basis for prospective pathogen discovery and disease prevention and control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a metataxonomics approach in concert with full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing and operational phylogenetic unit (OPU) analysis, we characterized the species-level microbial community structure of two important vector species, biting midges and ticks, including 33 arthropod samples comprising 3,885 individuals, collected around Poyang Lake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 662 OPUs were classified in biting midges, including 195 known species and 373 potentially new species, and 618 OPUs were classified in ticks, including 217 known species and 326 potentially new species. Surprisingly, OPUs with potentially pathogenicity were detected in both arthropod vectors, with 66 known species of biting midges reported to carry potential pathogens, including <i>Asaia lannensis</i> and <i>Rickettsia bellii</i>, compared to 50 in ticks, such as <i>Acinetobacter lwoffii</i> and <i>Staphylococcus sciuri</i>. We found that <i>Proteobacteria</i> was the most dominant group in both midges and ticks. Furthermore, the outcomes demonstrated that the microbiota of midges and ticks tend to be governed by a few highly abundant bacteria. <i>Pantoea</i> sp7 was predominant in biting midges, while <i>Coxiella</i> sp1 was enriched in ticks. Meanwhile, <i>Coxiella</i> spp., which may be essential for the survival of <i>Haemaphysalis longicornis</i> Neumann, were detected in all tick samples. The identification of dominant species and pathogens of biting midges and ticks in this study serves to broaden our knowledge associated to microbes of arthropod vectors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biting midges and ticks carry large numbers of known and potentially novel bacteria, and carry a wide range of potentially pathogenic bacteria, which may pose a risk of infection to humans and animals. The microbial communities of midges and ticks tend to be dominated by a few highly abundant bacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":93903,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Species-level Microbiota of Biting Midges and Ticks from Poyang Lake.\",\"authors\":\"Jian Gong, Fei Fei Wang, Yang Qing Liu, Ji Pu, Ling Zhi Dong, Si Hui Zhang, Zhen Zhou Huang, Yu Yuan Huang, Ya Ben Li, Cai Xin Yang, Yuan Meihui Tao, Li Jun Zhao, Dong Jin, Li Yun Liu, Jing Yang, Shan Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.3967/bes2024.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the bacterial communities of biting midges and ticks collected from three sites in the Poyang Lake area, namely, Qunlu Practice Base, Peach Blossom Garden, and Huangtong Animal Husbandry, and whether vectors carry any bacterial pathogens that may cause diseases to humans, to provide scientific basis for prospective pathogen discovery and disease prevention and control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a metataxonomics approach in concert with full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing and operational phylogenetic unit (OPU) analysis, we characterized the species-level microbial community structure of two important vector species, biting midges and ticks, including 33 arthropod samples comprising 3,885 individuals, collected around Poyang Lake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 662 OPUs were classified in biting midges, including 195 known species and 373 potentially new species, and 618 OPUs were classified in ticks, including 217 known species and 326 potentially new species. Surprisingly, OPUs with potentially pathogenicity were detected in both arthropod vectors, with 66 known species of biting midges reported to carry potential pathogens, including <i>Asaia lannensis</i> and <i>Rickettsia bellii</i>, compared to 50 in ticks, such as <i>Acinetobacter lwoffii</i> and <i>Staphylococcus sciuri</i>. We found that <i>Proteobacteria</i> was the most dominant group in both midges and ticks. Furthermore, the outcomes demonstrated that the microbiota of midges and ticks tend to be governed by a few highly abundant bacteria. <i>Pantoea</i> sp7 was predominant in biting midges, while <i>Coxiella</i> sp1 was enriched in ticks. Meanwhile, <i>Coxiella</i> spp., which may be essential for the survival of <i>Haemaphysalis longicornis</i> Neumann, were detected in all tick samples. The identification of dominant species and pathogens of biting midges and ticks in this study serves to broaden our knowledge associated to microbes of arthropod vectors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biting midges and ticks carry large numbers of known and potentially novel bacteria, and carry a wide range of potentially pathogenic bacteria, which may pose a risk of infection to humans and animals. The microbial communities of midges and ticks tend to be dominated by a few highly abundant bacteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2024.030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2024.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在调查鄱阳湖区群路实习基地、桃花源、皇通畜牧三个地点采集的咬蠓和蜱的细菌群落,以及媒介是否携带可能导致人类疾病的细菌病原,为前瞻性病原发现和疾病防控提供科学依据:方法:采用元基因组学方法,结合全长16S rRNA基因测序和操作系统发育单元(OPU)分析,对鄱阳湖周边采集的33个节肢动物样本(共3885个个体)中的两种重要媒介--咬蠓和蜱--的物种水平微生物群落结构进行了描述:结果表明:咬蠓和蜱的OPU分别为662个和618个,其中咬蠓为195个已知种,蜱为373个潜在新种;蜱为217个已知种,蜱为326个潜在新种。令人惊讶的是,两种节肢动物载体中都检测到了具有潜在致病性的 OPUs,据报道有 66 种已知种类的咬蠓携带有潜在病原体,其中包括 Asaia lannensis 和 Rickettsia bellii,而蜱虫中则有 50 种,其中包括 Acinetobacter lwoffii 和 Staphylococcus sciuri。我们发现,在蠓和蜱中,变形菌是最主要的菌群。此外,研究结果表明,蠓虫和蜱虫的微生物群往往受少数几种高含量细菌的控制。盘菌 sp7 在叮咬蠓中占主导地位,而柯西氏菌 sp1 则在蜱中大量存在。与此同时,在所有蜱虫样本中都检测到了柯西氏菌属,这可能是长角蜱(Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann)生存所必需的。本研究对叮咬蠓和蜱的主要物种和病原体的鉴定有助于拓宽我们对节肢动物媒介微生物的认识:咬蠓和蜱携带大量已知和潜在的新型细菌,并携带多种潜在致病细菌,可能对人类和动物造成感染风险。蠓虫和蜱虫的微生物群落往往由少数数量较多的细菌主导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Species-level Microbiota of Biting Midges and Ticks from Poyang Lake.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the bacterial communities of biting midges and ticks collected from three sites in the Poyang Lake area, namely, Qunlu Practice Base, Peach Blossom Garden, and Huangtong Animal Husbandry, and whether vectors carry any bacterial pathogens that may cause diseases to humans, to provide scientific basis for prospective pathogen discovery and disease prevention and control.

Methods: Using a metataxonomics approach in concert with full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing and operational phylogenetic unit (OPU) analysis, we characterized the species-level microbial community structure of two important vector species, biting midges and ticks, including 33 arthropod samples comprising 3,885 individuals, collected around Poyang Lake.

Results: A total of 662 OPUs were classified in biting midges, including 195 known species and 373 potentially new species, and 618 OPUs were classified in ticks, including 217 known species and 326 potentially new species. Surprisingly, OPUs with potentially pathogenicity were detected in both arthropod vectors, with 66 known species of biting midges reported to carry potential pathogens, including Asaia lannensis and Rickettsia bellii, compared to 50 in ticks, such as Acinetobacter lwoffii and Staphylococcus sciuri. We found that Proteobacteria was the most dominant group in both midges and ticks. Furthermore, the outcomes demonstrated that the microbiota of midges and ticks tend to be governed by a few highly abundant bacteria. Pantoea sp7 was predominant in biting midges, while Coxiella sp1 was enriched in ticks. Meanwhile, Coxiella spp., which may be essential for the survival of Haemaphysalis longicornis Neumann, were detected in all tick samples. The identification of dominant species and pathogens of biting midges and ticks in this study serves to broaden our knowledge associated to microbes of arthropod vectors.

Conclusion: Biting midges and ticks carry large numbers of known and potentially novel bacteria, and carry a wide range of potentially pathogenic bacteria, which may pose a risk of infection to humans and animals. The microbial communities of midges and ticks tend to be dominated by a few highly abundant bacteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信