用彗星试验监测人体动脉移植物的活力

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Physiological research Pub Date : 2024-04-30
A Pilin, I Mazura, R Lainkova, M Salmay, P Měřička, O Pecha, L Janoušek, T Grus, R Špunda, J Lindner, M Špaček
{"title":"用彗星试验监测人体动脉移植物的活力","authors":"A Pilin, I Mazura, R Lainkova, M Salmay, P Měřička, O Pecha, L Janoušek, T Grus, R Špunda, J Lindner, M Špaček","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An analytical method for studying DNA degradation by electrophoresis after cell lysis and visualization of DNA fragments with fluorescent dye, comet assay, was used to evaluate the viability of the endothelial layer of human arterial grafts with the aim of identifying the procedure that will least damage the tissue before cryopreservation. Four groups of samples were studied: cryopreserved arterial grafts that were thawed in two different ways, slowly lasting 2 hours or rapidly for approx. 7 minutes. Arterial grafts that were collected as part of multiorgan procurement with minimal warm ischemia time. Cadaveric grafts were taken as part of the autopsy, so they have a more extended period of warm ischemia. The HeadDNA (%) parameter and others commonly used parameters like TailDNA (%). TailMoment, TailLength, OliveMoment, TailMoment to characterize the comet were used to assess viability in this study. The ratio of non-decayed to decayed nuclei was determined from the values found. This ratio for cadaveric grafts was 0.63, for slowly thawed cryopreserved grafts 2.9, for rapidly thawed cryopreserved grafts 1.9, and for multi-organ procurement grafts 0.68. The results of the study confirmed the assumption that the allografts obtained from cadaveric donors are the least suitable. On the other hand, grafts obtained from multiorgan donors are better in terms of viability monitored by comet assay. Keywords: Arterial grafts, Cryopreservation, Cadaveric, Multiorgan procurement, Viability, Comet assay.</p>","PeriodicalId":20235,"journal":{"name":"Physiological research","volume":"73 2","pages":"217-225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11081180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viability of Human Arterial Grafts Monitored by Comet Assay.\",\"authors\":\"A Pilin, I Mazura, R Lainkova, M Salmay, P Měřička, O Pecha, L Janoušek, T Grus, R Špunda, J Lindner, M Špaček\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An analytical method for studying DNA degradation by electrophoresis after cell lysis and visualization of DNA fragments with fluorescent dye, comet assay, was used to evaluate the viability of the endothelial layer of human arterial grafts with the aim of identifying the procedure that will least damage the tissue before cryopreservation. Four groups of samples were studied: cryopreserved arterial grafts that were thawed in two different ways, slowly lasting 2 hours or rapidly for approx. 7 minutes. Arterial grafts that were collected as part of multiorgan procurement with minimal warm ischemia time. Cadaveric grafts were taken as part of the autopsy, so they have a more extended period of warm ischemia. The HeadDNA (%) parameter and others commonly used parameters like TailDNA (%). TailMoment, TailLength, OliveMoment, TailMoment to characterize the comet were used to assess viability in this study. The ratio of non-decayed to decayed nuclei was determined from the values found. This ratio for cadaveric grafts was 0.63, for slowly thawed cryopreserved grafts 2.9, for rapidly thawed cryopreserved grafts 1.9, and for multi-organ procurement grafts 0.68. The results of the study confirmed the assumption that the allografts obtained from cadaveric donors are the least suitable. On the other hand, grafts obtained from multiorgan donors are better in terms of viability monitored by comet assay. Keywords: Arterial grafts, Cryopreservation, Cadaveric, Multiorgan procurement, Viability, Comet assay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological research\",\"volume\":\"73 2\",\"pages\":\"217-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11081180/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

彗星试验是一种在细胞裂解后通过电泳研究 DNA 降解并用荧光染料观察 DNA 片段的分析方法,用于评估人体动脉移植物内皮层的存活能力,目的是确定冷冻保存前对组织损伤最小的程序。我们对四组样本进行了研究:冷冻保存的动脉移植物有两种不同的解冻方式:缓慢解冻 2 小时或快速解冻约 7 分钟。作为多器官采集的一部分收集的动脉移植物,热缺血时间最短。尸体移植物是尸体解剖的一部分,因此它们的热缺血时间更长。HeadDNA (%) 参数和其他常用参数,如 TailDNA (%).在本研究中,彗星的活力评估采用了彗尾动量(TailMoment)、彗尾长度(TailLength)、彗尾动量(OliveMoment)、彗尾动量(TailMoment)等常用参数。根据发现的数值确定未衰变与衰变细胞核的比率。尸体移植物的这一比率为 0.63,缓慢解冻的低温保存移植物为 2.9,快速解冻的低温保存移植物为 1.9,多器官移植移植物为 0.68。研究结果证实了从尸体捐献者身上获取的异体移植物最不适合的假设。另一方面,通过彗星试验监测,从多器官供体获得的移植物的存活率更高。关键词动脉移植物 低温保存 尸体 多器官采集 存活率 彗星试验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viability of Human Arterial Grafts Monitored by Comet Assay.

An analytical method for studying DNA degradation by electrophoresis after cell lysis and visualization of DNA fragments with fluorescent dye, comet assay, was used to evaluate the viability of the endothelial layer of human arterial grafts with the aim of identifying the procedure that will least damage the tissue before cryopreservation. Four groups of samples were studied: cryopreserved arterial grafts that were thawed in two different ways, slowly lasting 2 hours or rapidly for approx. 7 minutes. Arterial grafts that were collected as part of multiorgan procurement with minimal warm ischemia time. Cadaveric grafts were taken as part of the autopsy, so they have a more extended period of warm ischemia. The HeadDNA (%) parameter and others commonly used parameters like TailDNA (%). TailMoment, TailLength, OliveMoment, TailMoment to characterize the comet were used to assess viability in this study. The ratio of non-decayed to decayed nuclei was determined from the values found. This ratio for cadaveric grafts was 0.63, for slowly thawed cryopreserved grafts 2.9, for rapidly thawed cryopreserved grafts 1.9, and for multi-organ procurement grafts 0.68. The results of the study confirmed the assumption that the allografts obtained from cadaveric donors are the least suitable. On the other hand, grafts obtained from multiorgan donors are better in terms of viability monitored by comet assay. Keywords: Arterial grafts, Cryopreservation, Cadaveric, Multiorgan procurement, Viability, Comet assay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological research
Physiological research 医学-生理学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Research is a peer reviewed Open Access journal that publishes articles on normal and pathological physiology, biochemistry, biophysics, and pharmacology. Authors can submit original, previously unpublished research articles, review articles, rapid or short communications. Instructions for Authors - Respect the instructions carefully when submitting your manuscript. Submitted manuscripts or revised manuscripts that do not follow these Instructions will not be included into the peer-review process. The articles are available in full versions as pdf files beginning with volume 40, 1991. The journal publishes the online Ahead of Print /Pre-Press version of the articles that are searchable in Medline and can be cited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信