评估脂肪百分比的双重间接方法之间的一致性。

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance Pub Date : 2024-04-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2478/joeb-2024-0004
Hurtado B, Colina E, Gonzalez-Correa C H
{"title":"评估脂肪百分比的双重间接方法之间的一致性。","authors":"Hurtado B, Colina E, Gonzalez-Correa C H","doi":"10.2478/joeb-2024-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the last decades there is a growing interest in the evaluation of human body composition for being an important part of the integral assessment of individuals. Its use has been extended to different disciplines associated with health care (medicine, nutrition, physiotherapy), and to sports and population fields. Specifically, fat percentage can be related to innumerable diseases. However, there are discrepancies in the results of fat percentage measurement measured by different methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the concordance between two low-cost and easily accessible double indirect methods, which have been used indistinctly in different studies where access to more accurate methods is not available, and to determine fat percentage and its relationship with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, level of physical activity and sedentary hours.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>Twenty-four persons between 18 and 38 years and 28 between 39 and 59 years from a university community were evaluated. Calculations were made: BMI, fat % was estimated by anthropometry with a digital adipometer (Skyndex System I USA) and by Electrical Bioimpedance Analysis - BIA (Biody Expert ZM II FRA), physical activity level and sedentary hours were determined with the short IPAQ questionnaire. Pearson's correlation coefficient, Bland & Altman's graphical method and Lin's concordance correlation index were calculated. The significance level p<0.05 was estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fat percentage by anthropometry was: 30.5% ±8.5 (18-38 years) 35.0% ±6.7 (39-59 years); by BIA 27.0% ±7.3 (18-38 years) and 29.2% ±7.0 (39-59 years). Both techniques showed good correlation, but low degree of concordance (Lin index less than 0.9) except for the group of young persons with moderate level of physical activity (0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The doubly indirect methods used in the study showed strong correlation, but low concordance, so their use is not recommended indistinctly for the follow-up of a particular case. According to the study data for this specific population in young people with moderate physical activity, follow-up could be performed with either of the two methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":38125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","volume":"15 1","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10996899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concordance between dual indirect methods for assessing fat percentage.\",\"authors\":\"Hurtado B, Colina E, Gonzalez-Correa C H\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/joeb-2024-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the last decades there is a growing interest in the evaluation of human body composition for being an important part of the integral assessment of individuals. Its use has been extended to different disciplines associated with health care (medicine, nutrition, physiotherapy), and to sports and population fields. Specifically, fat percentage can be related to innumerable diseases. However, there are discrepancies in the results of fat percentage measurement measured by different methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the concordance between two low-cost and easily accessible double indirect methods, which have been used indistinctly in different studies where access to more accurate methods is not available, and to determine fat percentage and its relationship with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, level of physical activity and sedentary hours.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>Twenty-four persons between 18 and 38 years and 28 between 39 and 59 years from a university community were evaluated. Calculations were made: BMI, fat % was estimated by anthropometry with a digital adipometer (Skyndex System I USA) and by Electrical Bioimpedance Analysis - BIA (Biody Expert ZM II FRA), physical activity level and sedentary hours were determined with the short IPAQ questionnaire. Pearson's correlation coefficient, Bland & Altman's graphical method and Lin's concordance correlation index were calculated. The significance level p<0.05 was estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fat percentage by anthropometry was: 30.5% ±8.5 (18-38 years) 35.0% ±6.7 (39-59 years); by BIA 27.0% ±7.3 (18-38 years) and 29.2% ±7.0 (39-59 years). Both techniques showed good correlation, but low degree of concordance (Lin index less than 0.9) except for the group of young persons with moderate level of physical activity (0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The doubly indirect methods used in the study showed strong correlation, but low concordance, so their use is not recommended indistinctly for the follow-up of a particular case. According to the study data for this specific population in young people with moderate physical activity, follow-up could be performed with either of the two methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"26-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10996899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2024-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2024-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,人们对人体成分评估的兴趣日益浓厚,因为它是个人综合评估的重要组成部分。其应用已扩展到与医疗保健相关的不同学科(医学、营养学、物理疗法)以及体育和人口领域。具体来说,脂肪百分比与许多疾病有关。然而,用不同方法测量脂肪率的结果存在差异:评估两种低成本、易获得的双间接法之间的一致性,这两种方法在无法获得更精确方法的不同研究中被模糊使用,并确定脂肪百分比及其与年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、腰围、体力活动水平和久坐时间的关系:对某大学社区 24 名 18 至 38 岁的人和 28 名 39 至 59 岁的人进行了评估。进行了计算:体重指数(BMI)、脂肪率是通过使用数字脂肪测量仪(Skyndex System I USA)和生物电阻抗分析仪(BIA)(Biody Expert ZM II FRA)进行人体测量估算的,体力活动水平和久坐时间是通过简短的 IPAQ 问卷调查确定的。计算了皮尔逊相关系数、布兰德和阿尔特曼图解法以及林氏一致性相关指数。结果的显著性水平为 p:人体测量法得出的脂肪百分比为30.5%±8.5(18-38 岁)和 35.0%±6.7(39-59 岁);BIA 为 27.0%±7.3(18-38 岁)和 29.2%±7.0(39-59 岁)。这两种方法显示出良好的相关性,但除了中等体力活动水平的年轻人组(0.95)外,其他组的一致性较低(Lin 指数小于 0.9):结论:研究中使用的双重间接方法显示出很强的相关性,但一致性较低,因此不建议在对特定病例进行随访时不加区分地使用这些方法。根据对中等体力活动量的年轻人这一特定人群的研究数据,可以使用这两种方法中的任何一种进行随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concordance between dual indirect methods for assessing fat percentage.

In the last decades there is a growing interest in the evaluation of human body composition for being an important part of the integral assessment of individuals. Its use has been extended to different disciplines associated with health care (medicine, nutrition, physiotherapy), and to sports and population fields. Specifically, fat percentage can be related to innumerable diseases. However, there are discrepancies in the results of fat percentage measurement measured by different methods.

Objective: To evaluate the concordance between two low-cost and easily accessible double indirect methods, which have been used indistinctly in different studies where access to more accurate methods is not available, and to determine fat percentage and its relationship with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, level of physical activity and sedentary hours.

Materials and method: Twenty-four persons between 18 and 38 years and 28 between 39 and 59 years from a university community were evaluated. Calculations were made: BMI, fat % was estimated by anthropometry with a digital adipometer (Skyndex System I USA) and by Electrical Bioimpedance Analysis - BIA (Biody Expert ZM II FRA), physical activity level and sedentary hours were determined with the short IPAQ questionnaire. Pearson's correlation coefficient, Bland & Altman's graphical method and Lin's concordance correlation index were calculated. The significance level p<0.05 was estimated.

Results: The fat percentage by anthropometry was: 30.5% ±8.5 (18-38 years) 35.0% ±6.7 (39-59 years); by BIA 27.0% ±7.3 (18-38 years) and 29.2% ±7.0 (39-59 years). Both techniques showed good correlation, but low degree of concordance (Lin index less than 0.9) except for the group of young persons with moderate level of physical activity (0.95).

Conclusions: The doubly indirect methods used in the study showed strong correlation, but low concordance, so their use is not recommended indistinctly for the follow-up of a particular case. According to the study data for this specific population in young people with moderate physical activity, follow-up could be performed with either of the two methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信