Paola Giraldo, Susana Díez, María Lopera, Leidy Alzate, Gilma Villarreal, Ana Caraballo, Sandra Carmona, Laura Osorio, María Yepes, Jorge Sánchez
{"title":"[使用聚合提取物的屋尘螨免疫疗法对虾的致敏频率]。","authors":"Paola Giraldo, Susana Díez, María Lopera, Leidy Alzate, Gilma Villarreal, Ana Caraballo, Sandra Carmona, Laura Osorio, María Yepes, Jorge Sánchez","doi":"10.29262/ram.v71i1.1356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the risk of IgE sensitization and symptoms to shrimp in a population that has received AIT with polymerized mite extract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with allergic rhinitis sensitized to dust mites (Dermatophogides spp) with an indication for mite AIT were included. Those patients who had not yet received AIT or had received less than 6 doses were included as controls and those who had received more than 24 doses of AIT were included as cases. Sensitization to shrimp was assessed by skin prick test with complete shrimp extract and/or shrimp-specific IgE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 patients were included; 47 cases and 21 controls. When calculating the odds ratio of sensitization according to time with immunotherapy we observed that there were no differences between the group of cases and controls (OR 0.76 95% CI 0.26 to 2.22 p 0.7 by MacNemar technique). Factors such as consumption or not of shrimp and frequency of consumption do not seem to be related to the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In contrast to what was reported with aqueous extracts, we observed that AIT with polymerized extracts is not a risk factor for shrimp sensitization. It is necessary to reproduce these results with a larger sample size to explore other factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":101421,"journal":{"name":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","volume":"71 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Frequency of sensitization to shrimp with house dust mite immunotherapy with polymerized extracts].\",\"authors\":\"Paola Giraldo, Susana Díez, María Lopera, Leidy Alzate, Gilma Villarreal, Ana Caraballo, Sandra Carmona, Laura Osorio, María Yepes, Jorge Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.29262/ram.v71i1.1356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the risk of IgE sensitization and symptoms to shrimp in a population that has received AIT with polymerized mite extract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with allergic rhinitis sensitized to dust mites (Dermatophogides spp) with an indication for mite AIT were included. Those patients who had not yet received AIT or had received less than 6 doses were included as controls and those who had received more than 24 doses of AIT were included as cases. Sensitization to shrimp was assessed by skin prick test with complete shrimp extract and/or shrimp-specific IgE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 patients were included; 47 cases and 21 controls. When calculating the odds ratio of sensitization according to time with immunotherapy we observed that there were no differences between the group of cases and controls (OR 0.76 95% CI 0.26 to 2.22 p 0.7 by MacNemar technique). Factors such as consumption or not of shrimp and frequency of consumption do not seem to be related to the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In contrast to what was reported with aqueous extracts, we observed that AIT with polymerized extracts is not a risk factor for shrimp sensitization. It is necessary to reproduce these results with a larger sample size to explore other factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v71i1.1356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v71i1.1356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估接受过聚合螨提取物 AIT 的人群对虾的 IgE 致敏风险和症状:方法:纳入对尘螨(Dermatophogides spp)过敏并有螨 AIT 适应症的过敏性鼻炎患者。尚未接受过 AIT 或接受过少于 6 次 AIT 的患者为对照组,接受过 24 次以上 AIT 的患者为病例组。通过虾提取物和/或虾特异性 IgE 皮肤点刺试验评估对虾的过敏性:结果:共纳入 68 例患者,其中 47 例为病例,21 例为对照。在根据接受免疫治疗的时间计算致敏几率时,我们发现病例组和对照组之间没有差异(根据 MacNemar 技术,OR 0.76 95% CI 0.26 至 2.22 p 0.7)。食用或不食用虾以及食用频率等因素似乎与结果无关:与水提取物的报告相反,我们发现使用聚合提取物的 AIT 并不是虾致敏的风险因素。有必要用更大的样本量来重现这些结果,以探索其他因素。
[Frequency of sensitization to shrimp with house dust mite immunotherapy with polymerized extracts].
Objective: To evaluate the risk of IgE sensitization and symptoms to shrimp in a population that has received AIT with polymerized mite extract.
Methods: Patients with allergic rhinitis sensitized to dust mites (Dermatophogides spp) with an indication for mite AIT were included. Those patients who had not yet received AIT or had received less than 6 doses were included as controls and those who had received more than 24 doses of AIT were included as cases. Sensitization to shrimp was assessed by skin prick test with complete shrimp extract and/or shrimp-specific IgE.
Results: A total of 68 patients were included; 47 cases and 21 controls. When calculating the odds ratio of sensitization according to time with immunotherapy we observed that there were no differences between the group of cases and controls (OR 0.76 95% CI 0.26 to 2.22 p 0.7 by MacNemar technique). Factors such as consumption or not of shrimp and frequency of consumption do not seem to be related to the outcome.
Conclusion: In contrast to what was reported with aqueous extracts, we observed that AIT with polymerized extracts is not a risk factor for shrimp sensitization. It is necessary to reproduce these results with a larger sample size to explore other factors.