双模式听力对术后生活质量的影响

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Jamie A Schlacter, Leena Asfour, Margareta Morrissette, William Shapiro, Emily Spitzer, Susan B Waltzman
{"title":"双模式听力对术后生活质量的影响","authors":"Jamie A Schlacter, Leena Asfour, Margareta Morrissette, William Shapiro, Emily Spitzer, Susan B Waltzman","doi":"10.1159/000539121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine how bimodal stimulation affects quality of life (QOL) during the postoperative period following cochlear implantation (CI). These data could potentially provide evidence to encourage more bimodal candidates to continue hearing aid (HA) use after CI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, patients completed preoperative and 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-activation QOL surveys on listening effort, speech perception, sound quality/localization, and hearing handicap. Fifteen HA users who were candidates for contralateral CI completed the study (mean age 65.6 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients used both devices at a median rate of 97%, 97%, and 98% of the time at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. On average, patients' hearing handicap scores decreased by 16% at 1 month, 36% at 3 months, and 30% at 6 months. Patients' listening effort scores decreased by a mean of 10.8% at 1 month, 12.6% at 3 months, and 18.7% at 6 months. Localization significantly improved by 24.3% at 1 month and remained steady. There was no significant improvement in sound quality scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bimodal listeners should expect QOL to improve, and listening effort and localization are generally optimized using CI and HA compared to CI alone. Some scores improved at earlier time points than others, suggesting bimodal auditory skills may develop at different rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Bimodal Hearing on Postoperative Quality of Life.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie A Schlacter, Leena Asfour, Margareta Morrissette, William Shapiro, Emily Spitzer, Susan B Waltzman\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine how bimodal stimulation affects quality of life (QOL) during the postoperative period following cochlear implantation (CI). These data could potentially provide evidence to encourage more bimodal candidates to continue hearing aid (HA) use after CI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, patients completed preoperative and 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-activation QOL surveys on listening effort, speech perception, sound quality/localization, and hearing handicap. Fifteen HA users who were candidates for contralateral CI completed the study (mean age 65.6 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients used both devices at a median rate of 97%, 97%, and 98% of the time at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. On average, patients' hearing handicap scores decreased by 16% at 1 month, 36% at 3 months, and 30% at 6 months. Patients' listening effort scores decreased by a mean of 10.8% at 1 month, 12.6% at 3 months, and 18.7% at 6 months. Localization significantly improved by 24.3% at 1 month and remained steady. There was no significant improvement in sound quality scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bimodal listeners should expect QOL to improve, and listening effort and localization are generally optimized using CI and HA compared to CI alone. Some scores improved at earlier time points than others, suggesting bimodal auditory skills may develop at different rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介研究双模式刺激如何影响人工耳蜗植入术(CI)术后的生活质量(QOL)。这些数据有可能为鼓励更多的双模患者在人工耳蜗植入术后继续使用助听器(HA)提供证据:在这项前瞻性研究中,患者在术前、术后 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月分别完成了关于听力、言语感知、声音质量/定位和听力障碍的 QOL 调查。15名HA使用者完成了研究,他们都是对侧CI的候选者(平均年龄65.6岁):结果:患者在 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月使用两种设备的中位数比例分别为 97%、97% 和 98%。平均而言,患者的听力障碍评分在 1 个月时降低了 16%,在 3 个月时降低了 36%,在 6 个月时降低了 30%。患者的听力评分在 1 个月时平均下降了 10.8%,3 个月时下降了 12.6%,6 个月时下降了 18.7%。定位能力在 1 个月时提高了 24.3%,之后保持稳定。声音质量得分没有明显改善:结论:双模态听者的 QOL 应该有所改善,与单独使用 CI 相比,使用 CI 和 HA 时的听力和定位能力普遍得到优化。有些评分在较早的时间点就得到了改善,这表明双模态听觉技能可能会以不同的速度发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Bimodal Hearing on Postoperative Quality of Life.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to examine how bimodal stimulation affects quality of life (QOL) during the postoperative period following cochlear implantation (CI). These data could potentially provide evidence to encourage more bimodal candidates to continue hearing aid (HA) use after CI.

Methods: In this prospective study, patients completed preoperative and 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-activation QOL surveys on listening effort, speech perception, sound quality/localization, and hearing handicap. Fifteen HA users who were candidates for contralateral CI completed the study (mean age 65.6 years).

Results: Patients used both devices at a median rate of 97%, 97%, and 98% of the time at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. On average, patients' hearing handicap scores decreased by 16% at 1 month, 36% at 3 months, and 30% at 6 months. Patients' listening effort scores decreased by a mean of 10.8% at 1 month, 12.6% at 3 months, and 18.7% at 6 months. Localization significantly improved by 24.3% at 1 month and remained steady. There was no significant improvement in sound quality scores.

Conclusion: Bimodal listeners should expect QOL to improve, and listening effort and localization are generally optimized using CI and HA compared to CI alone. Some scores improved at earlier time points than others, suggesting bimodal auditory skills may develop at different rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信