蝴蝶杂交种染色体融合的减数分裂驱动力

IF 2.4 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Jesper Boman, Christer Wiklund, Roger Vila, Niclas Backström
{"title":"蝴蝶杂交种染色体融合的减数分裂驱动力","authors":"Jesper Boman, Christer Wiklund, Roger Vila, Niclas Backström","doi":"10.1007/s10577-024-09752-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Species frequently differ in the number and structure of chromosomes they harbor, but individuals that are heterozygous for chromosomal rearrangements may suffer from reduced fitness. Chromosomal rearrangements like fissions and fusions can hence serve as a mechanism for speciation between incipient lineages, but their evolution poses a paradox. How can rearrangements get fixed between populations if heterozygotes have reduced fitness? One solution is that this process predominantly occurs in small and isolated populations, where genetic drift can override natural selection. However, fixation is also more likely if a novel rearrangement is favored by a transmission bias, such as meiotic drive. Here, we investigate chromosomal transmission distortion in hybrids between two wood white (Leptidea sinapis) butterfly populations with extensive karyotype differences. Using data from two different crossing experiments, we uncover that there is a transmission bias favoring the ancestral chromosomal state for derived fusions, a result that shows that chromosome fusions actually can fix in populations despite being counteracted by meiotic drive. This means that meiotic drive not only can promote runaway chromosome number evolution and speciation, but also that it can be a conservative force acting against karyotypic change and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Based on our results, we suggest a mechanistic model for why chromosome fusion mutations may be opposed by meiotic drive and discuss factors contributing to karyotype evolution in Lepidoptera.</p>","PeriodicalId":50698,"journal":{"name":"Chromosome Research","volume":"32 2","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meiotic drive against chromosome fusions in butterfly hybrids.\",\"authors\":\"Jesper Boman, Christer Wiklund, Roger Vila, Niclas Backström\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10577-024-09752-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Species frequently differ in the number and structure of chromosomes they harbor, but individuals that are heterozygous for chromosomal rearrangements may suffer from reduced fitness. Chromosomal rearrangements like fissions and fusions can hence serve as a mechanism for speciation between incipient lineages, but their evolution poses a paradox. How can rearrangements get fixed between populations if heterozygotes have reduced fitness? One solution is that this process predominantly occurs in small and isolated populations, where genetic drift can override natural selection. However, fixation is also more likely if a novel rearrangement is favored by a transmission bias, such as meiotic drive. Here, we investigate chromosomal transmission distortion in hybrids between two wood white (Leptidea sinapis) butterfly populations with extensive karyotype differences. Using data from two different crossing experiments, we uncover that there is a transmission bias favoring the ancestral chromosomal state for derived fusions, a result that shows that chromosome fusions actually can fix in populations despite being counteracted by meiotic drive. This means that meiotic drive not only can promote runaway chromosome number evolution and speciation, but also that it can be a conservative force acting against karyotypic change and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Based on our results, we suggest a mechanistic model for why chromosome fusion mutations may be opposed by meiotic drive and discuss factors contributing to karyotype evolution in Lepidoptera.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chromosome Research\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068667/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chromosome Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-024-09752-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chromosome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-024-09752-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物种往往在染色体的数量和结构上存在差异,但染色体重排的杂合个体可能会降低适应性。因此,染色体重排(如裂片和融合)可以作为初生种系之间物种分化的一种机制,但其进化却带来了一个悖论。如果杂合子的适合度降低,那么重排如何在种群之间固定下来?一种解决方案是,这一过程主要发生在小规模和孤立的种群中,在这些种群中,遗传漂变可能会超越自然选择。然而,如果新的重排受到传播偏倚(如减数分裂驱动)的青睐,那么固定化也更有可能发生。在这里,我们研究了两个具有广泛核型差异的木白(Leptidea sinapis)蝴蝶种群杂交后代的染色体传递畸变。利用来自两个不同杂交实验的数据,我们发现,对于衍生的融合体来说,存在着有利于祖先染色体状态的传递偏差,这一结果表明,尽管减数分裂驱动力起着抵消作用,但染色体融合实际上可以在种群中固定下来。这意味着减数分裂驱动力不仅能促进染色体数目的失控进化和物种分化,还能成为一种保守的力量,对抗核型变化和生殖隔离的进化。基于我们的研究结果,我们提出了一个染色体融合突变可能受到减数分裂驱动反对的机理模型,并讨论了鳞翅目昆虫核型进化的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Meiotic drive against chromosome fusions in butterfly hybrids.

Meiotic drive against chromosome fusions in butterfly hybrids.

Species frequently differ in the number and structure of chromosomes they harbor, but individuals that are heterozygous for chromosomal rearrangements may suffer from reduced fitness. Chromosomal rearrangements like fissions and fusions can hence serve as a mechanism for speciation between incipient lineages, but their evolution poses a paradox. How can rearrangements get fixed between populations if heterozygotes have reduced fitness? One solution is that this process predominantly occurs in small and isolated populations, where genetic drift can override natural selection. However, fixation is also more likely if a novel rearrangement is favored by a transmission bias, such as meiotic drive. Here, we investigate chromosomal transmission distortion in hybrids between two wood white (Leptidea sinapis) butterfly populations with extensive karyotype differences. Using data from two different crossing experiments, we uncover that there is a transmission bias favoring the ancestral chromosomal state for derived fusions, a result that shows that chromosome fusions actually can fix in populations despite being counteracted by meiotic drive. This means that meiotic drive not only can promote runaway chromosome number evolution and speciation, but also that it can be a conservative force acting against karyotypic change and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Based on our results, we suggest a mechanistic model for why chromosome fusion mutations may be opposed by meiotic drive and discuss factors contributing to karyotype evolution in Lepidoptera.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chromosome Research
Chromosome Research 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
31
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Chromosome Research publishes manuscripts from work based on all organisms and encourages submissions in the following areas including, but not limited, to: · Chromosomes and their linkage to diseases; · Chromosome organization within the nucleus; · Chromatin biology (transcription, non-coding RNA, etc); · Chromosome structure, function and mechanics; · Chromosome and DNA repair; · Epigenetic chromosomal functions (centromeres, telomeres, replication, imprinting, dosage compensation, sex determination, chromosome remodeling); · Architectural/epigenomic organization of the genome; · Functional annotation of the genome; · Functional and comparative genomics in plants and animals; · Karyology studies that help resolve difficult taxonomic problems or that provide clues to fundamental mechanisms of genome and karyotype evolution in plants and animals; · Mitosis and Meiosis; · Cancer cytogenomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信