Alexander Lankowski, Deanna Tollefson, Hugo Sánchez, Robinson Cabello, José Hidalgo, Mary N Mathison, Yamilé Molina, Ann Duerr
{"title":"秘鲁利马与变性女性发生性行为的男性和变性女性对基于场所的艾滋病毒检测和预防干预措施的接受程度:一项形成性定性研究。","authors":"Alexander Lankowski, Deanna Tollefson, Hugo Sánchez, Robinson Cabello, José Hidalgo, Mary N Mathison, Yamilé Molina, Ann Duerr","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite being at elevated risk for HIV, men who have sex with transgender women (MSTW) are an overlooked population in the global HIV response. Venue-based HIV interventions have previously had success reaching other HIV priority populations, including transgender women (TW). Similar approaches could be applied for MSTW.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the prospective acceptability of venue-based HIV testing and prevention interventions for MSTW and TW in Lima, Peru.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this exploratory qualitative study, we conducted in-depth interviews (IDI) and focus group discussions (FGD) with three types of participants: MSTW (7 IDIs, 1 FGD), TW (1 FGD), and owners of social venues frequented by MSTW/TW in Lima (2 IDIs). We elicited participants' attitudes and perceptions related to the following four hypothetical interventions delivered at social venues in Lima: rapid HIV testing; HIV self-test distribution; condom/lubricant distribution; and enrolment in a mobile app supporting HIV prevention. We performed a mixed deductive-inductive thematic analysis using the framework method, then applied the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability to classify the overall acceptability of each intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Condom/lubricant distribution and app-based HIV prevention information were highly acceptable among all participant types. The two HIV testing interventions had relatively lower acceptability; however, participants suggested this could be overcome if such interventions focused on ensuring discretion, providing access to healthcare professionals, and offering appropriate incentives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, MSTW and TW shared similar favourable attitudes towards venue-based HIV interventions. Venue-based outreach warrants further exploration as a strategy for engaging MSTW and TW in HIV prevention activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":"2331360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11142865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability of venue-based HIV testing and prevention interventions for men who have sex with transgender women and transgender women in Lima, Perú: a formative, qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Lankowski, Deanna Tollefson, Hugo Sánchez, Robinson Cabello, José Hidalgo, Mary N Mathison, Yamilé Molina, Ann Duerr\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite being at elevated risk for HIV, men who have sex with transgender women (MSTW) are an overlooked population in the global HIV response. Venue-based HIV interventions have previously had success reaching other HIV priority populations, including transgender women (TW). Similar approaches could be applied for MSTW.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the prospective acceptability of venue-based HIV testing and prevention interventions for MSTW and TW in Lima, Peru.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this exploratory qualitative study, we conducted in-depth interviews (IDI) and focus group discussions (FGD) with three types of participants: MSTW (7 IDIs, 1 FGD), TW (1 FGD), and owners of social venues frequented by MSTW/TW in Lima (2 IDIs). We elicited participants' attitudes and perceptions related to the following four hypothetical interventions delivered at social venues in Lima: rapid HIV testing; HIV self-test distribution; condom/lubricant distribution; and enrolment in a mobile app supporting HIV prevention. We performed a mixed deductive-inductive thematic analysis using the framework method, then applied the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability to classify the overall acceptability of each intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Condom/lubricant distribution and app-based HIV prevention information were highly acceptable among all participant types. The two HIV testing interventions had relatively lower acceptability; however, participants suggested this could be overcome if such interventions focused on ensuring discretion, providing access to healthcare professionals, and offering appropriate incentives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, MSTW and TW shared similar favourable attitudes towards venue-based HIV interventions. Venue-based outreach warrants further exploration as a strategy for engaging MSTW and TW in HIV prevention activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIV Research & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"2331360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11142865/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIV Research & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管与变性女性发生性行为的男性(MSTW)感染艾滋病毒的风险较高,但他们在全球艾滋病毒应对行动中却是一个被忽视的人群。以场所为基础的艾滋病干预措施曾成功地覆盖了其他艾滋病重点人群,包括变性女性(TW)。类似的方法也可用于变性妇女:评估秘鲁利马的变性女性和跨性别女性对基于场所的 HIV 检测和预防干预措施的预期可接受性:在这项探索性定性研究中,我们对三类参与者进行了深度访谈(IDI)和焦点小组讨论(FGD):他们分别是:利马的男性和女性科技工作者(7 次 IDI,1 次 FGD)、女性科技工作者(1 次 FGD)以及男性和女性科技工作者/女性科技工作者经常光顾的社交场所的业主(2 次 IDI)。我们征求了参与者对利马社交场所提供的以下四种假设干预措施的态度和看法:HIV 快速检测;HIV 自我检测分发;安全套/润滑剂分发;以及加入支持 HIV 预防的移动应用程序。我们使用框架法进行了演绎-归纳混合主题分析,然后应用可接受性理论框架对每项干预措施的总体可接受性进行了分类:在所有参与者类型中,安全套/润滑剂发放和基于应用程序的艾滋病预防信息的接受度都很高。两种 HIV 检测干预措施的可接受性相对较低;但是,参与者认为,如果这些干预措施侧重于确保谨慎性、提供与医疗保健专业人员接触的机会以及提供适当的激励措施,则可以克服这一问题:总体而言,男性和女性对基于场地的艾滋病干预措施持相似的赞成态度。以场所为基础的外展活动值得进一步探索,以作为吸引小贩和流浪汉参与艾滋病预防活动的一种策略。
Acceptability of venue-based HIV testing and prevention interventions for men who have sex with transgender women and transgender women in Lima, Perú: a formative, qualitative study.
Background: Despite being at elevated risk for HIV, men who have sex with transgender women (MSTW) are an overlooked population in the global HIV response. Venue-based HIV interventions have previously had success reaching other HIV priority populations, including transgender women (TW). Similar approaches could be applied for MSTW.
Objective: To evaluate the prospective acceptability of venue-based HIV testing and prevention interventions for MSTW and TW in Lima, Peru.
Methods: In this exploratory qualitative study, we conducted in-depth interviews (IDI) and focus group discussions (FGD) with three types of participants: MSTW (7 IDIs, 1 FGD), TW (1 FGD), and owners of social venues frequented by MSTW/TW in Lima (2 IDIs). We elicited participants' attitudes and perceptions related to the following four hypothetical interventions delivered at social venues in Lima: rapid HIV testing; HIV self-test distribution; condom/lubricant distribution; and enrolment in a mobile app supporting HIV prevention. We performed a mixed deductive-inductive thematic analysis using the framework method, then applied the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability to classify the overall acceptability of each intervention.
Results: Condom/lubricant distribution and app-based HIV prevention information were highly acceptable among all participant types. The two HIV testing interventions had relatively lower acceptability; however, participants suggested this could be overcome if such interventions focused on ensuring discretion, providing access to healthcare professionals, and offering appropriate incentives.
Conclusions: Overall, MSTW and TW shared similar favourable attitudes towards venue-based HIV interventions. Venue-based outreach warrants further exploration as a strategy for engaging MSTW and TW in HIV prevention activities.