Q Zeng, Y Tang, H T Zhou, N Li, W Y Liu, S L Chen, S Li, N N Lu, H Fang, S L Wang, Y P Liu, Y W Song, Y X Li, J Jin
{"title":"[新辅助直肠评分在新辅助短程放疗和巩固化疗后局部晚期直肠癌预后和辅助化疗决策中的作用]。","authors":"Q Zeng, Y Tang, H T Zhou, N Li, W Y Liu, S L Chen, S Li, N N Lu, H Fang, S L Wang, Y P Liu, Y W Song, Y X Li, J Jin","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To assess the prognostic impact of the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), as well as its value in guiding decisions for adjuvant chemotherapy. <b>Methods:</b> Between August 2015 and August 2018, patients were eligible from the STELLAR phase III trial (NCT02533271) who received short-course radiotherapy plus consolidation chemotherapy and for whom the NAR score could be calculated. Based on the NAR score, patients were categorized into low (<8), intermediate (8-16), and high (>16) groups. The Kaplan-Meier method, log rank tests, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the impact of the NAR score on disease-free survival (DFS). <b>Results:</b> Out of the 232 patients, 24.1%, 48.7%, and 27.2% had low (56 cases), intermediate (113 cases), and high NAR scores (63 cases), respectively. The median follow-up period was 37 months, with 3-year DFS rates of 87.3%, 68.3%, and 53.4% (<i>P</i><0.001) for the low, intermediate, and high NAR score groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the NAR score (intermediate NAR score: <i>HR</i>, 3.10, 95% <i>CI</i>, 1.30-7.37, <i>P</i>=0.011; high NAR scores: <i>HR</i>=5.44, 95% <i>CI</i>, 2.26-13.09, <i>P</i><0.001), resection status (<i>HR</i>, 3.00, 95% <i>CI</i>, 1.64-5.52, <i>P</i><0.001), and adjuvant chemotherapy (<i>HR</i>, 3.25, 95% <i>CI</i>, 2.01-5.27, <i>P</i><0.001) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. In patients with R0 resection, the 3-year DFS rates were 97.8% and 78.0% for those with low and intermediate NAR scores who received adjuvant chemotherapy, significantly higher than the 43.2% and 50.6% for those who did not (<i>P</i><0.001, <i>P</i>=0.002). There was no significant difference in the 3-year DFS rate (54.2% vs 53.3%, <i>P</i>=0.214) among high NAR score patients, regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. <b>Conclusions:</b> The NAR score is a robust prognostic indicator in LARC following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy, with potential implications for subsequent decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy. These findings warrant further validation in studies with larger sample sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Role of neoadjuvant rectal score in prognosis and adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy].\",\"authors\":\"Q Zeng, Y Tang, H T Zhou, N Li, W Y Liu, S L Chen, S Li, N N Lu, H Fang, S L Wang, Y P Liu, Y W Song, Y X Li, J Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To assess the prognostic impact of the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), as well as its value in guiding decisions for adjuvant chemotherapy. <b>Methods:</b> Between August 2015 and August 2018, patients were eligible from the STELLAR phase III trial (NCT02533271) who received short-course radiotherapy plus consolidation chemotherapy and for whom the NAR score could be calculated. Based on the NAR score, patients were categorized into low (<8), intermediate (8-16), and high (>16) groups. The Kaplan-Meier method, log rank tests, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the impact of the NAR score on disease-free survival (DFS). <b>Results:</b> Out of the 232 patients, 24.1%, 48.7%, and 27.2% had low (56 cases), intermediate (113 cases), and high NAR scores (63 cases), respectively. The median follow-up period was 37 months, with 3-year DFS rates of 87.3%, 68.3%, and 53.4% (<i>P</i><0.001) for the low, intermediate, and high NAR score groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the NAR score (intermediate NAR score: <i>HR</i>, 3.10, 95% <i>CI</i>, 1.30-7.37, <i>P</i>=0.011; high NAR scores: <i>HR</i>=5.44, 95% <i>CI</i>, 2.26-13.09, <i>P</i><0.001), resection status (<i>HR</i>, 3.00, 95% <i>CI</i>, 1.64-5.52, <i>P</i><0.001), and adjuvant chemotherapy (<i>HR</i>, 3.25, 95% <i>CI</i>, 2.01-5.27, <i>P</i><0.001) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. In patients with R0 resection, the 3-year DFS rates were 97.8% and 78.0% for those with low and intermediate NAR scores who received adjuvant chemotherapy, significantly higher than the 43.2% and 50.6% for those who did not (<i>P</i><0.001, <i>P</i>=0.002). There was no significant difference in the 3-year DFS rate (54.2% vs 53.3%, <i>P</i>=0.214) among high NAR score patients, regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. <b>Conclusions:</b> The NAR score is a robust prognostic indicator in LARC following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy, with potential implications for subsequent decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy. These findings warrant further validation in studies with larger sample sizes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华肿瘤杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华肿瘤杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肿瘤杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的评估局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)新辅助短程放疗和巩固化疗后直肠(NAR)新辅助评分对预后的影响,以及其对辅助化疗决策的指导价值。方法:2015年8月至2018年8月期间,STELLAR III期试验(NCT02533271)中符合条件的患者均接受了短程放疗加巩固化疗,且NAR评分可以计算。根据 NAR 评分,患者被分为低(<8)、中(8-16)和高(>16)组。采用卡普兰-梅耶法、对数秩检验和多变量考克斯比例危险回归模型评估NAR评分对无病生存期(DFS)的影响。结果显示在232例患者中,NAR评分低(56例)、中等(113例)和高(63例)的患者分别占24.1%、48.7%和27.2%。中位随访时间为37个月,低、中、高NAR评分组的3年DFS率分别为87.3%、68.3%和53.4%(P<0.001)。HR=5.44,95% CI,2.26-13.09,P<0.001)、切除状态(HR,3.00,95% CI,1.64-5.52,P<0.001)和辅助化疗(HR,3.25,95% CI,2.01-5.27,P<0.001)是DFS的独立预后因素。在R0切除的患者中,接受辅助化疗的低度和中度NAR评分患者的3年DFS率分别为97.8%和78.0%,显著高于未接受辅助化疗患者的43.2%和50.6%(P<0.001,P=0.002)。无论是否接受辅助化疗,NAR评分高的患者的3年DFS率没有明显差异(54.2% vs 53.3%,P=0.214)。结论:NAR评分是新辅助短程放疗和巩固化疗后LARC的一个可靠预后指标,对后续辅助化疗决策具有潜在影响。这些发现值得在样本量更大的研究中进一步验证。
[Role of neoadjuvant rectal score in prognosis and adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy].
Objectives: To assess the prognostic impact of the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), as well as its value in guiding decisions for adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Between August 2015 and August 2018, patients were eligible from the STELLAR phase III trial (NCT02533271) who received short-course radiotherapy plus consolidation chemotherapy and for whom the NAR score could be calculated. Based on the NAR score, patients were categorized into low (<8), intermediate (8-16), and high (>16) groups. The Kaplan-Meier method, log rank tests, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the impact of the NAR score on disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Out of the 232 patients, 24.1%, 48.7%, and 27.2% had low (56 cases), intermediate (113 cases), and high NAR scores (63 cases), respectively. The median follow-up period was 37 months, with 3-year DFS rates of 87.3%, 68.3%, and 53.4% (P<0.001) for the low, intermediate, and high NAR score groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the NAR score (intermediate NAR score: HR, 3.10, 95% CI, 1.30-7.37, P=0.011; high NAR scores: HR=5.44, 95% CI, 2.26-13.09, P<0.001), resection status (HR, 3.00, 95% CI, 1.64-5.52, P<0.001), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 3.25, 95% CI, 2.01-5.27, P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. In patients with R0 resection, the 3-year DFS rates were 97.8% and 78.0% for those with low and intermediate NAR scores who received adjuvant chemotherapy, significantly higher than the 43.2% and 50.6% for those who did not (P<0.001, P=0.002). There was no significant difference in the 3-year DFS rate (54.2% vs 53.3%, P=0.214) among high NAR score patients, regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: The NAR score is a robust prognostic indicator in LARC following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy, with potential implications for subsequent decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy. These findings warrant further validation in studies with larger sample sizes.