[心力衰竭患者肺部有效动脉弹性的预后能力]

Q3 Medicine
Y H Wu, B P Huang, J Y Feng, L Y Huang, X M Zhao, J Wang, J Y Guan, X Q Li, Y H Zhang, J Zhang
{"title":"[心力衰竭患者肺部有效动脉弹性的预后能力]","authors":"Y H Wu, B P Huang, J Y Feng, L Y Huang, X M Zhao, J Wang, J Y Guan, X Q Li, Y H Zhang, J Zhang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231120-00449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the predictive value of pulmonary effective arterial elastance (Ea) in patients with heart failure (HF). <b>Methods:</b> This is a retrospective cohort study, which retrospectively included 284 patients with HF who underwent right heart catheterization at Heart Failure Center in Fuwai Hospital between September 2013 and February 2022. Data regarding baseline clinical characteristics, hemodynamic profiles, and prognosis were collected. Ea was calculated as mean pulmonary arterial pressure/stroke volume. Patients were divided into Ea<0.555 group and Ea≥0.555 group according to the median value of Ea (0.555 mmHg/ml, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). The primary outcome was the primary clinical event, set as the first occurrence of a series of composite events, including all-cause death, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation, and HF rehospitalization. Event-free survival was defined as the absence of primary clinical events. Spearman correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation coefficient between Ea and parameters reflective of right heart function. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the different groups for the estimation of outcomes with the log-rank test. We used Cox proportional-hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (<i>HR</i>) for primary clinical event. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the age, gender, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, presence of pulmonary hypertension, and serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) values. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to calculate the area under the curve (<i>AUC</i>) of Ea for predicting event-free survival in patients with HF. <b>Results:</b> The median age was 51 years, and 206 (72.5%) patients were male. Ea and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were significantly correlated (<i>r</i>=0.698, <i>P<</i>0.001). The correlation between Ea and pulmonary arterial elastance (PAC) were even more significant (<i>r</i>=-0.888, <i>P</i><0.001). Compared with Ea<0.555 group, Ea≥0.555 group presented with higher serum NT-proBNP values (4 443 (1 792, 8 554) ng/L vs. 1 721 (480, 4 528)ng/L,<i>P</i><0.001), higher PVR (3.4 (2.5, 4.7) Wood vs. 1.4 (0.9, 2.2) Wood, <i>P</i><0.001), lower cardiac output (3.0 (2.3, 3.9) L/min vs. 4.3 (3.8, 4.9) L/min, <i>P</i><0.001), and lower PAC (1.6 (1.3, 2.0) ml/mmHg vs. 4.0 (3.0, 6.0) ml/mmHg, <i>P</i><0.001). The median follow-up time was 392 (166, 811) days. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a lower event-free survival rate in the Ea≥0.555 group compared to the Ea<0.555 group (<i>P</i><sub>log-rank</sub><0.001). After multivariate adjustment, Ea (<i>HR</i>=1.734, <i>P</i><0.001) remained significantly associated with the primary outcome. Subgroup analysis indicated that Ea was associated with the primary outcome across all subgroups. The <i>AUC</i> was 0.724 (<i>P</i><0.001) for Ea to predict event-free survival calculated from ROC analysis. <b>Conclusions:</b> Ea is closely related to parameters reflective of right ventricular afterload. Increased Ea is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":38755,"journal":{"name":"中华心血管病杂志","volume":"52 4","pages":"397-404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Prognostic performance of pulmonary effective arterial elastance in patients with heart failure].\",\"authors\":\"Y H Wu, B P Huang, J Y Feng, L Y Huang, X M Zhao, J Wang, J Y Guan, X Q Li, Y H Zhang, J Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231120-00449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the predictive value of pulmonary effective arterial elastance (Ea) in patients with heart failure (HF). <b>Methods:</b> This is a retrospective cohort study, which retrospectively included 284 patients with HF who underwent right heart catheterization at Heart Failure Center in Fuwai Hospital between September 2013 and February 2022. Data regarding baseline clinical characteristics, hemodynamic profiles, and prognosis were collected. Ea was calculated as mean pulmonary arterial pressure/stroke volume. Patients were divided into Ea<0.555 group and Ea≥0.555 group according to the median value of Ea (0.555 mmHg/ml, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). The primary outcome was the primary clinical event, set as the first occurrence of a series of composite events, including all-cause death, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation, and HF rehospitalization. Event-free survival was defined as the absence of primary clinical events. Spearman correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation coefficient between Ea and parameters reflective of right heart function. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the different groups for the estimation of outcomes with the log-rank test. We used Cox proportional-hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (<i>HR</i>) for primary clinical event. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the age, gender, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, presence of pulmonary hypertension, and serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) values. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to calculate the area under the curve (<i>AUC</i>) of Ea for predicting event-free survival in patients with HF. <b>Results:</b> The median age was 51 years, and 206 (72.5%) patients were male. Ea and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were significantly correlated (<i>r</i>=0.698, <i>P<</i>0.001). The correlation between Ea and pulmonary arterial elastance (PAC) were even more significant (<i>r</i>=-0.888, <i>P</i><0.001). Compared with Ea<0.555 group, Ea≥0.555 group presented with higher serum NT-proBNP values (4 443 (1 792, 8 554) ng/L vs. 1 721 (480, 4 528)ng/L,<i>P</i><0.001), higher PVR (3.4 (2.5, 4.7) Wood vs. 1.4 (0.9, 2.2) Wood, <i>P</i><0.001), lower cardiac output (3.0 (2.3, 3.9) L/min vs. 4.3 (3.8, 4.9) L/min, <i>P</i><0.001), and lower PAC (1.6 (1.3, 2.0) ml/mmHg vs. 4.0 (3.0, 6.0) ml/mmHg, <i>P</i><0.001). The median follow-up time was 392 (166, 811) days. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a lower event-free survival rate in the Ea≥0.555 group compared to the Ea<0.555 group (<i>P</i><sub>log-rank</sub><0.001). After multivariate adjustment, Ea (<i>HR</i>=1.734, <i>P</i><0.001) remained significantly associated with the primary outcome. Subgroup analysis indicated that Ea was associated with the primary outcome across all subgroups. The <i>AUC</i> was 0.724 (<i>P</i><0.001) for Ea to predict event-free survival calculated from ROC analysis. <b>Conclusions:</b> Ea is closely related to parameters reflective of right ventricular afterload. Increased Ea is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with HF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华心血管病杂志\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"397-404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华心血管病杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231120-00449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华心血管病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231120-00449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨肺有效动脉弹性(Ea)对心力衰竭(HF)患者的预测价值:探讨肺有效动脉弹性(Ea)对心力衰竭(HF)患者的预测价值。方法: 这是一项回顾性队列研究:这是一项回顾性队列研究,回顾性纳入了 2013 年 9 月至 2022 年 2 月期间在阜外医院心衰中心接受右心导管检查的 284 例心衰患者。研究收集了有关基线临床特征、血液动力学特征和预后的数据。Ea以平均肺动脉压/每搏量计算。根据主要临床事件将患者分为 EaHR)。根据年龄、性别、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级、左心室射血分数、是否存在肺动脉高压以及血清 N 端前 B 型钠尿肽(NT-proBNP)值进行亚组分析。我们使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)计算了 Ea 预测心房颤动患者无事件生存期的曲线下面积(AUC)。结果显示中位年龄为 51 岁,206 名(72.5%)患者为男性。Ea 与肺血管阻力(PVR)显著相关(r=0.698,P0.001)。Ea 与肺动脉弹性(PAC)之间的相关性更为明显(r=-0.888,PPPPlog-rankHR=1.734,PAUC 为 0.724):Ea 与反映右心室后负荷的参数密切相关。Ea 增加是心房颤动患者不良预后的独立预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Prognostic performance of pulmonary effective arterial elastance in patients with heart failure].

Objective: To explore the predictive value of pulmonary effective arterial elastance (Ea) in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, which retrospectively included 284 patients with HF who underwent right heart catheterization at Heart Failure Center in Fuwai Hospital between September 2013 and February 2022. Data regarding baseline clinical characteristics, hemodynamic profiles, and prognosis were collected. Ea was calculated as mean pulmonary arterial pressure/stroke volume. Patients were divided into Ea<0.555 group and Ea≥0.555 group according to the median value of Ea (0.555 mmHg/ml, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). The primary outcome was the primary clinical event, set as the first occurrence of a series of composite events, including all-cause death, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation, and HF rehospitalization. Event-free survival was defined as the absence of primary clinical events. Spearman correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation coefficient between Ea and parameters reflective of right heart function. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the different groups for the estimation of outcomes with the log-rank test. We used Cox proportional-hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for primary clinical event. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the age, gender, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, presence of pulmonary hypertension, and serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) values. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) of Ea for predicting event-free survival in patients with HF. Results: The median age was 51 years, and 206 (72.5%) patients were male. Ea and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were significantly correlated (r=0.698, P<0.001). The correlation between Ea and pulmonary arterial elastance (PAC) were even more significant (r=-0.888, P<0.001). Compared with Ea<0.555 group, Ea≥0.555 group presented with higher serum NT-proBNP values (4 443 (1 792, 8 554) ng/L vs. 1 721 (480, 4 528)ng/L,P<0.001), higher PVR (3.4 (2.5, 4.7) Wood vs. 1.4 (0.9, 2.2) Wood, P<0.001), lower cardiac output (3.0 (2.3, 3.9) L/min vs. 4.3 (3.8, 4.9) L/min, P<0.001), and lower PAC (1.6 (1.3, 2.0) ml/mmHg vs. 4.0 (3.0, 6.0) ml/mmHg, P<0.001). The median follow-up time was 392 (166, 811) days. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a lower event-free survival rate in the Ea≥0.555 group compared to the Ea<0.555 group (Plog-rank<0.001). After multivariate adjustment, Ea (HR=1.734, P<0.001) remained significantly associated with the primary outcome. Subgroup analysis indicated that Ea was associated with the primary outcome across all subgroups. The AUC was 0.724 (P<0.001) for Ea to predict event-free survival calculated from ROC analysis. Conclusions: Ea is closely related to parameters reflective of right ventricular afterload. Increased Ea is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with HF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华心血管病杂志
中华心血管病杂志 Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10577
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Cardiology , established in February 1973, is one of the major academic medical journals sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and a leading periodical in the field of cardiology in China. It specializes in cardiology and related disciplines with a readership of more than 25 000. The journal publishes editorials and guidelines as well as important original articles on clinical and experimental investigations, reflecting achievements made in China and promoting academic communication between domestic and foreign cardiologists. The journal includes the following columns: Editorials, Strategies, Comments, Clinical Investigations, Experimental Investigations, Epidemiology and Prevention, Lectures, Comprehensive Reviews, Continuing Medical Education, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信