鼻内夹板取出时间对鼻中隔成形术后并发症的影响

Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_381_23
S Arslan, H Yıldırım, B Çobanoğlu, A Ü Işık, O Bahadır
{"title":"鼻内夹板取出时间对鼻中隔成形术后并发症的影响","authors":"S Arslan, H Yıldırım, B Çobanoğlu, A Ü Işık, O Bahadır","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_381_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various types of nasal tampons are used for packing after septoplasty. Intranasal splints are widely used as they are more advantageous than other materials regarding the lower complication rates of synechia, and lesser pain during removal. However, there is no consensus on the timing of intranasal splint removal after septoplasty operations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of removal time of intranasal splints on postoperative complications after septoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred patients who had septoplasty were randomly divided into two groups according to splint removal time. In group I, the splints were removed on the third postoperative day and in group II, splints were removed on the seventh postoperative day. Pain during splint removal was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). Complications of hemorrhage, septal hematoma, crusting, mucosal injury, and infection were recorded during splint removal and compared. In the first postoperative month, hemorrhage, crusting, mucosal injury, infection, synechia, and in the second postoperative month, synechia and perforation rates were compared between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mucosal crusting was significantly higher in group II during splint removal. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the complication rates and pain scores. Our findings showed no significant difference in pain scores during splint removal and postoperative complications between the two groups except for mucosal crusting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our findings, although there is no consensus on the optimal time for splint removal, earlier removal of splints can be considered a favorable option after septoplasty operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Intranasal Splint Removal Time on Postoperative Complications after Septoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"S Arslan, H Yıldırım, B Çobanoğlu, A Ü Işık, O Bahadır\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njcp.njcp_381_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various types of nasal tampons are used for packing after septoplasty. Intranasal splints are widely used as they are more advantageous than other materials regarding the lower complication rates of synechia, and lesser pain during removal. However, there is no consensus on the timing of intranasal splint removal after septoplasty operations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of removal time of intranasal splints on postoperative complications after septoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred patients who had septoplasty were randomly divided into two groups according to splint removal time. In group I, the splints were removed on the third postoperative day and in group II, splints were removed on the seventh postoperative day. Pain during splint removal was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). Complications of hemorrhage, septal hematoma, crusting, mucosal injury, and infection were recorded during splint removal and compared. In the first postoperative month, hemorrhage, crusting, mucosal injury, infection, synechia, and in the second postoperative month, synechia and perforation rates were compared between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mucosal crusting was significantly higher in group II during splint removal. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the complication rates and pain scores. Our findings showed no significant difference in pain scores during splint removal and postoperative complications between the two groups except for mucosal crusting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our findings, although there is no consensus on the optimal time for splint removal, earlier removal of splints can be considered a favorable option after septoplasty operations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_381_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_381_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鼻中隔成形术后使用各种类型的鼻腔填塞物。鼻内夹板比其他材料更有优势,因为鼻内夹板的并发症较少,而且在取出时疼痛较轻,因此被广泛使用。目的:本研究旨在探讨鼻内夹板取出时间对鼻中隔成形术后并发症的影响:方法:将 100 名鼻中隔成形术患者按夹板取出时间随机分为两组。第一组在术后第三天拆除夹板,第二组在术后第七天拆除夹板。拆卸夹板时的疼痛用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估。在拆除夹板过程中记录并比较了出血、鼻中隔血肿、结痂、粘膜损伤和感染等并发症。比较两组术后第一个月的出血率、结痂率、粘膜损伤率、感染率、鼻中隔血肿率以及术后第二个月的鼻中隔血肿率和穿孔率:结果:在拆除夹板时,第二组的粘膜结痂率明显更高。两组在并发症发生率和疼痛评分方面的差异无统计学意义。我们的研究结果表明,除粘膜结痂外,两组患者在拆除夹板时的疼痛评分和术后并发症方面无明显差异:根据我们的研究结果,尽管对拆除夹板的最佳时间还没有达成共识,但可以认为在鼻中隔成形术后提前拆除夹板是一个有利的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Impact of Intranasal Splint Removal Time on Postoperative Complications after Septoplasty.

Background: Various types of nasal tampons are used for packing after septoplasty. Intranasal splints are widely used as they are more advantageous than other materials regarding the lower complication rates of synechia, and lesser pain during removal. However, there is no consensus on the timing of intranasal splint removal after septoplasty operations.

Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of removal time of intranasal splints on postoperative complications after septoplasty.

Methods: One hundred patients who had septoplasty were randomly divided into two groups according to splint removal time. In group I, the splints were removed on the third postoperative day and in group II, splints were removed on the seventh postoperative day. Pain during splint removal was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). Complications of hemorrhage, septal hematoma, crusting, mucosal injury, and infection were recorded during splint removal and compared. In the first postoperative month, hemorrhage, crusting, mucosal injury, infection, synechia, and in the second postoperative month, synechia and perforation rates were compared between two groups.

Results: Mucosal crusting was significantly higher in group II during splint removal. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the complication rates and pain scores. Our findings showed no significant difference in pain scores during splint removal and postoperative complications between the two groups except for mucosal crusting.

Conclusion: Based on our findings, although there is no consensus on the optimal time for splint removal, earlier removal of splints can be considered a favorable option after septoplasty operations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信