用于诊断肺外结核病的护理点超声波。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
L T Allan-Blitz, C Yarbrough, M Ndayizigiye, C Wade, A J Goldsmith, N M Duggan
{"title":"用于诊断肺外结核病的护理点超声波。","authors":"L T Allan-Blitz, C Yarbrough, M Ndayizigiye, C Wade, A J Goldsmith, N M Duggan","doi":"10.5588/ijtld.23.0471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><sec id=\"st1\"><title>BACKGROUND</title>Despite the high morbidity and mortality globally, standard microbiologic diagnosis for TB requires laboratory infrastructure inaccessible in many resource-limited areas and may be insufficient for identifying extrapulmonary disease. Point-of-care (POC) ultrasound facilitates visualization of extrapulmonary manifestations, permitting laboratory-independent diagnosis, but its diagnostic utility remains unclear.</sec><sec id=\"st2\"><title>METHODS</title>We conducted a systematic review of five online databases for studies reporting ultrasound findings among cases with and without extrapulmonary TB (EPTB). A minimum of two authors independently screened and reviewed each article, and extracted data elements of interest. We conducted a series of univariate meta-analyses using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled effect estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).</sec><sec id=\"st3\"><title>RESULTS</title>Of 279 articles identified, 6 were included. There were 699 cases of EPTB among 1,633 participants. The pooled sensitivity estimate was 0.72 (95% CI 0.57-0.88). The pooled specificity estimate was 0.77 (95% CI 0.63-0.90). The pooled PPV and NPV estimates were respectively 0.67 (95% CI 0.47-0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.93).</sec><sec id=\"st4\"><title>CONCLUSION</title>POC ultrasound showed modest test characteristics for diagnosing EPTB, which may constitute an improvement over some currently available diagnostics.</sec>.</p>","PeriodicalId":14411,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease","volume":"28 5","pages":"217-224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-care ultrasound for diagnosing extrapulmonary TB.\",\"authors\":\"L T Allan-Blitz, C Yarbrough, M Ndayizigiye, C Wade, A J Goldsmith, N M Duggan\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/ijtld.23.0471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><sec id=\\\"st1\\\"><title>BACKGROUND</title>Despite the high morbidity and mortality globally, standard microbiologic diagnosis for TB requires laboratory infrastructure inaccessible in many resource-limited areas and may be insufficient for identifying extrapulmonary disease. Point-of-care (POC) ultrasound facilitates visualization of extrapulmonary manifestations, permitting laboratory-independent diagnosis, but its diagnostic utility remains unclear.</sec><sec id=\\\"st2\\\"><title>METHODS</title>We conducted a systematic review of five online databases for studies reporting ultrasound findings among cases with and without extrapulmonary TB (EPTB). A minimum of two authors independently screened and reviewed each article, and extracted data elements of interest. We conducted a series of univariate meta-analyses using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled effect estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).</sec><sec id=\\\"st3\\\"><title>RESULTS</title>Of 279 articles identified, 6 were included. There were 699 cases of EPTB among 1,633 participants. The pooled sensitivity estimate was 0.72 (95% CI 0.57-0.88). The pooled specificity estimate was 0.77 (95% CI 0.63-0.90). The pooled PPV and NPV estimates were respectively 0.67 (95% CI 0.47-0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.93).</sec><sec id=\\\"st4\\\"><title>CONCLUSION</title>POC ultrasound showed modest test characteristics for diagnosing EPTB, which may constitute an improvement over some currently available diagnostics.</sec>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"217-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.23.0471\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.23.0471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尽管结核病在全球的发病率和死亡率都很高,但标准的结核病微生物学诊断需要实验室基础设施,而许多资源有限的地区无法获得这些基础设施,而且可能不足以确定肺外疾病。我们对五个在线数据库中报告肺外结核病(EPTB)病例和非肺外结核病(EPTB)病例超声检查结果的研究进行了系统性回顾。每篇文章至少由两名作者独立筛选和审阅,并提取感兴趣的数据元素。我们使用随机效应模型进行了一系列单变量荟萃分析,以计算出每种结果的集合效应估计值和 95% 置信区间 (CI):灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV) 和阴性预测值 (NPV)。在 1,633 名参与者中有 699 例 EPTB 病例。汇总的灵敏度估计值为 0.72(95% CI 0.57-0.88)。综合特异性估计值为 0.77(95% CI 0.63-0.90)。综合 PPV 和 NPV 估计值分别为 0.67 (95% CI 0.47-0.87) 和 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.93)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Point-of-care ultrasound for diagnosing extrapulmonary TB.

BACKGROUNDDespite the high morbidity and mortality globally, standard microbiologic diagnosis for TB requires laboratory infrastructure inaccessible in many resource-limited areas and may be insufficient for identifying extrapulmonary disease. Point-of-care (POC) ultrasound facilitates visualization of extrapulmonary manifestations, permitting laboratory-independent diagnosis, but its diagnostic utility remains unclear.METHODSWe conducted a systematic review of five online databases for studies reporting ultrasound findings among cases with and without extrapulmonary TB (EPTB). A minimum of two authors independently screened and reviewed each article, and extracted data elements of interest. We conducted a series of univariate meta-analyses using a random-effects model to calculate the pooled effect estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).RESULTSOf 279 articles identified, 6 were included. There were 699 cases of EPTB among 1,633 participants. The pooled sensitivity estimate was 0.72 (95% CI 0.57-0.88). The pooled specificity estimate was 0.77 (95% CI 0.63-0.90). The pooled PPV and NPV estimates were respectively 0.67 (95% CI 0.47-0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.93).CONCLUSIONPOC ultrasound showed modest test characteristics for diagnosing EPTB, which may constitute an improvement over some currently available diagnostics..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
266
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease publishes articles on all aspects of lung health, including public health-related issues such as training programmes, cost-benefit analysis, legislation, epidemiology, intervention studies and health systems research. The IJTLD is dedicated to the continuing education of physicians and health personnel and the dissemination of information on tuberculosis and lung health world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信