使用步行测试评估消防员体能。

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-02-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Stephanie Donahue, Bilal Chaudhry, Carly McMorrow, Morgan Daly, Summer B Cook, Michael Brian, Deborah L Feairheller
{"title":"使用步行测试评估消防员体能。","authors":"Stephanie Donahue, Bilal Chaudhry, Carly McMorrow, Morgan Daly, Summer B Cook, Michael Brian, Deborah L Feairheller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tactical populations face increased risk on the job, and it is known that firefighters have high levels of cardiac-related death. Aerobic fitness is a modifiable cardiac risk factor, but many fire stations lack the proper equipment to easily assess aerobic fitness levels of their firefighters. Additionally, many fire stations lack wellness programs to hold firefighters accountable for maintaining their fitness levels.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We assessed the validity of the submaximal 6-minute walk test (6MWT) as a measure of aerobic capacity compared to a maximal treadmill test and the submaximal Gerkin protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four firefighters (19 male, 5 female, 34.8 ± 9.7 years; 38.1 ± 3.6 kg·m<sup>-2</sup>) completed the 6MWT, the submaximal Gerkin protocol, and a maximal treadmill test. Data were analyzed with Bland-Altman plots and correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found equivalence between the 6MWT and directly measured VO2max and between the 6MWT and Gerkin protocol using Bland-Altman plots. In our cohort, the 6MWT underestimated VO2max (31.57 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) compared to directly measured VO2max (38.1 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) by 17% and to the Gerkin (40.48 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) by 22%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering its equivalence, using the 6MWT could be a more accessible way to quantify aerobic capacity in firefighters. Despite underestimation, having an easy to administer protocol may encourage more fire stations to assess pre- and post- fitness levels regularly.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 4","pages":"285-297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a Walking Test to Assess Firefighter Fitness.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Donahue, Bilal Chaudhry, Carly McMorrow, Morgan Daly, Summer B Cook, Michael Brian, Deborah L Feairheller\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tactical populations face increased risk on the job, and it is known that firefighters have high levels of cardiac-related death. Aerobic fitness is a modifiable cardiac risk factor, but many fire stations lack the proper equipment to easily assess aerobic fitness levels of their firefighters. Additionally, many fire stations lack wellness programs to hold firefighters accountable for maintaining their fitness levels.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We assessed the validity of the submaximal 6-minute walk test (6MWT) as a measure of aerobic capacity compared to a maximal treadmill test and the submaximal Gerkin protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four firefighters (19 male, 5 female, 34.8 ± 9.7 years; 38.1 ± 3.6 kg·m<sup>-2</sup>) completed the 6MWT, the submaximal Gerkin protocol, and a maximal treadmill test. Data were analyzed with Bland-Altman plots and correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found equivalence between the 6MWT and directly measured VO2max and between the 6MWT and Gerkin protocol using Bland-Altman plots. In our cohort, the 6MWT underestimated VO2max (31.57 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) compared to directly measured VO2max (38.1 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) by 17% and to the Gerkin (40.48 ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) by 22%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering its equivalence, using the 6MWT could be a more accessible way to quantify aerobic capacity in firefighters. Despite underestimation, having an easy to administer protocol may encourage more fire stations to assess pre- and post- fitness levels regularly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"285-297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042844/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

战术人群在工作中面临着更大的风险,众所周知,消防员因心脏原因死亡的比例很高。有氧健身是一个可调节的心脏风险因素,但许多消防站缺乏适当的设备,无法轻松评估消防员的有氧健身水平。目的:我们评估了亚极限 6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)作为有氧能力测量方法的有效性,并与最大跑步机测试和亚极限格尔金方案进行了比较:24 名消防员(19 名男性,5 名女性,34.8±9.7 岁;38.1±3.6 kg-m-2)完成了 6MWT 测试、亚极限格尔金方案和极限跑步机测试。数据采用布兰德-阿尔特曼图和相关分析法进行分析:结果:通过布兰德-阿尔特曼图,我们发现 6MWT 和直接测量的 VO2max 之间以及 6MWT 和 Gerkin 方案之间具有等效性。在我们的队列中,6MWT 低估的 VO2max(31.57 ml-kg-1-min-1)比直接测量的 VO2max(38.1 ml-kg-1-min-1)低 17%,比 Gerkin(40.48 ml-kg-1-min-1)低 22%:考虑到其等效性,使用 6MWT 是量化消防员有氧能力的一种更便捷的方法。尽管评估结果被低估了,但拥有一个易于实施的方案可以鼓励更多的消防站定期对消防员的前后体能水平进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using a Walking Test to Assess Firefighter Fitness.

Tactical populations face increased risk on the job, and it is known that firefighters have high levels of cardiac-related death. Aerobic fitness is a modifiable cardiac risk factor, but many fire stations lack the proper equipment to easily assess aerobic fitness levels of their firefighters. Additionally, many fire stations lack wellness programs to hold firefighters accountable for maintaining their fitness levels.

Purpose: We assessed the validity of the submaximal 6-minute walk test (6MWT) as a measure of aerobic capacity compared to a maximal treadmill test and the submaximal Gerkin protocol.

Methods: Twenty-four firefighters (19 male, 5 female, 34.8 ± 9.7 years; 38.1 ± 3.6 kg·m-2) completed the 6MWT, the submaximal Gerkin protocol, and a maximal treadmill test. Data were analyzed with Bland-Altman plots and correlation analysis.

Results: We found equivalence between the 6MWT and directly measured VO2max and between the 6MWT and Gerkin protocol using Bland-Altman plots. In our cohort, the 6MWT underestimated VO2max (31.57 ml·kg-1·min-1) compared to directly measured VO2max (38.1 ml·kg-1·min-1) by 17% and to the Gerkin (40.48 ml·kg-1·min-1) by 22%.

Conclusion: Considering its equivalence, using the 6MWT could be a more accessible way to quantify aerobic capacity in firefighters. Despite underestimation, having an easy to administer protocol may encourage more fire stations to assess pre- and post- fitness levels regularly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信