Christopher P Bonilla, Greg A Ryan, Jason C Casey, Brandon D Spradley, Robert L Herron
{"title":"激活后性能强化训练对预备役男学员陆军战斗体能测试成绩的急性影响。","authors":"Christopher P Bonilla, Greg A Ryan, Jason C Casey, Brandon D Spradley, Robert L Herron","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing task-specific, post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) strategies, to acutely improve Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) performance. Nineteen ROTC cadets completed two ACFTs, separated by 72 hours. Approximately half (n = 10) completed the traditional \"Preparation Drill\" as their warm-up prior to the first session and added PAPE warm-up strategies as part of their second session. The other group (n = 9) completed the treatments in the opposite order to facilitate a repeated-measures, crossover design. The participants' composite ACFT score was used as the primary outcome measure of interest to explore mean difference in a two-way (Time x Treatment), repeated measures ANOVA. There was no interaction [F(1,8) = 0.075, <i>p</i> = 0.79] nor main effect of treatment [F(1,8) = 0.084, <i>p</i> = 0.78]. However, there was a main effect of Time [F(1,8) = 58.87, p < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.25] (mean ACFT score ± SD: Session 1 = 527 ± 43, Session 2 = 537 ± 39). The results of this study did not support the use of additional PAPE strategies to improve ACFT performance. However, there was a practice effect when the test was completed twice, separated by 72 hours in those with ACFT experience. The effect of Time was present for ACFT cumulative score, as well as event-level differences in three out of six events. Further research should implement familiarization sessions to minimize a practice effect from influencing results.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 4","pages":"154-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Effects of Post-activation Performance Enhancement Exercises on Army Combat Fitness Test Performance in Male ROTC Cadets.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher P Bonilla, Greg A Ryan, Jason C Casey, Brandon D Spradley, Robert L Herron\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing task-specific, post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) strategies, to acutely improve Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) performance. Nineteen ROTC cadets completed two ACFTs, separated by 72 hours. Approximately half (n = 10) completed the traditional \\\"Preparation Drill\\\" as their warm-up prior to the first session and added PAPE warm-up strategies as part of their second session. The other group (n = 9) completed the treatments in the opposite order to facilitate a repeated-measures, crossover design. The participants' composite ACFT score was used as the primary outcome measure of interest to explore mean difference in a two-way (Time x Treatment), repeated measures ANOVA. There was no interaction [F(1,8) = 0.075, <i>p</i> = 0.79] nor main effect of treatment [F(1,8) = 0.084, <i>p</i> = 0.78]. However, there was a main effect of Time [F(1,8) = 58.87, p < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.25] (mean ACFT score ± SD: Session 1 = 527 ± 43, Session 2 = 537 ± 39). The results of this study did not support the use of additional PAPE strategies to improve ACFT performance. However, there was a practice effect when the test was completed twice, separated by 72 hours in those with ACFT experience. The effect of Time was present for ACFT cumulative score, as well as event-level differences in three out of six events. Further research should implement familiarization sessions to minimize a practice effect from influencing results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"154-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042893/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是评估针对特定任务实施激活后成绩提高(PAPE)策略的效果,以迅速提高陆军战斗体能测试(ACFT)成绩。19 名预备役军官学员完成了两次 ACFT 测试,两次测试之间相隔 72 小时。大约一半的学员(n = 10)在第一次测试前完成了传统的 "准备操 "热身,并在第二次测试中加入了 PAPE 热身策略。另一组(n = 9)以相反的顺序完成治疗,以方便进行重复测量、交叉设计。在双向(时间 x 治疗)重复测量方差分析中,将参与者的 ACFT 综合得分作为主要结果测量指标,以探讨平均差异。没有交互作用[F(1,8) = 0.075, p = 0.79],也没有治疗的主效应[F(1,8) = 0.084, p = 0.78]。然而,时间存在主效应[F(1,8) = 58.87, p < 0.001, d = 0.25](ACFT 平均得分± SD:疗程 1 = 527 ± 43,疗程 2 = 537 ± 39)。本研究结果不支持使用额外的 PAPE 策略来提高 ACFT 成绩。然而,对于有 ACFT 经验的人来说,在 72 小时内完成两次测试会产生练习效应。时间对 ACFT 累计得分以及六个项目中三个项目的水平差异都有影响。进一步的研究应实施熟悉环节,以尽量减少练习效应对结果的影响。
Acute Effects of Post-activation Performance Enhancement Exercises on Army Combat Fitness Test Performance in Male ROTC Cadets.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing task-specific, post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) strategies, to acutely improve Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) performance. Nineteen ROTC cadets completed two ACFTs, separated by 72 hours. Approximately half (n = 10) completed the traditional "Preparation Drill" as their warm-up prior to the first session and added PAPE warm-up strategies as part of their second session. The other group (n = 9) completed the treatments in the opposite order to facilitate a repeated-measures, crossover design. The participants' composite ACFT score was used as the primary outcome measure of interest to explore mean difference in a two-way (Time x Treatment), repeated measures ANOVA. There was no interaction [F(1,8) = 0.075, p = 0.79] nor main effect of treatment [F(1,8) = 0.084, p = 0.78]. However, there was a main effect of Time [F(1,8) = 58.87, p < 0.001, d = 0.25] (mean ACFT score ± SD: Session 1 = 527 ± 43, Session 2 = 537 ± 39). The results of this study did not support the use of additional PAPE strategies to improve ACFT performance. However, there was a practice effect when the test was completed twice, separated by 72 hours in those with ACFT experience. The effect of Time was present for ACFT cumulative score, as well as event-level differences in three out of six events. Further research should implement familiarization sessions to minimize a practice effect from influencing results.